Department of Occupational Health, Research Center of Health Sciences and Technologies, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;10:898826. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.898826. eCollection 2022.
Characterizing risks associated with laboratory activities in universities may improve health, safety, and environmental management and reduce work-related diseases and accidents. This study aimed to develop and implement a chemical risk assessment method to determine and prioritize more hazardous chemicals in the academic laboratories.
A case-series study was conducted at five academic laboratories and research facilities of an Iranian medical sciences university in 2021. A risk assessment was developed and implemented in three phases to identify, evaluate, and classify potential risks and hazards. The approach provided an innovative tool for evaluating and prioritizing risks in chemical laboratories. Hazards were classified on a five-level scale. The technique reviewed both quantitative and qualitative data and pieces of evidence using Laboratory Safety Guidance (OSHA), Occupational Hazard Datasheet (ILO), the standards of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), and National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) codes.
Overall, the frequency of risks rated from "moderate" to "very high" levels was determined for the health hazards (9.3%), environmental hazards (35.2%), and safety hazards (20.4%). Hydrochloric acid had a high consumption rate in laboratory operations and received the highest risk levels in terms of potential hazards to employees' health and the environment. Nitric acid, Sulfuric acid, Formaldehyde, and Sodium hydroxide were assessed as potential health hazards. Moreover, Ethanol and Sulfuric acid were recognized as safety hazards. We observed adequate security provisions and procedures in academic laboratory operations. However, the lack of awareness concerning health, safety, environmental chemical hazards, and inappropriate sewage disposal systems contributed to the increasing levels of laboratory risk.
Chemicals used in laboratory activities generate workplace and environmental hazards that must be assessed, managed, and risk mitigated. Developing a method of rating health, safety, and environmental risks related to laboratory chemicals may assist in defining and understanding potential hazards. Our assessment suggested the need for improving the risk perception of individuals involved in handling chemicals to prevent exposure from workplace duties and environmental pollution hazards.
对大学实验室活动相关风险进行特征描述,可能会改善健康、安全和环境管理,减少与工作相关的疾病和事故。本研究旨在开发并实施一种化学风险评估方法,以确定和优先考虑学术实验室中更危险的化学品。
2021 年,对伊朗一所医学科学大学的五个学术实验室和研究设施进行了病例系列研究。开发并实施了风险评估,以识别、评估和分类潜在风险和危害。该方法为评估和优先考虑化学实验室中的风险提供了一个创新工具。危害分为五个级别。该技术使用 OSHA(美国职业安全与健康管理局)的实验室安全指南、ILO(国际劳工组织)的职业危害数据表、美国政府工业卫生学家会议(ACGIH)的标准、国际癌症研究机构(IARC)和美国国家消防协会(NFPA)的规范,审查了定量和定性数据以及各种证据。
总体而言,健康危害(9.3%)、环境危害(35.2%)和安全危害(20.4%)的风险等级评定为“中等”至“非常高”。盐酸在实验室操作中的消耗量较高,在对员工健康和环境的潜在危害方面,其风险水平最高。硝酸、硫酸、甲醛和氢氧化钠被评估为潜在的健康危害。此外,乙醇和硫酸被认为是安全危害。我们观察到学术实验室操作中有足够的安全规定和程序。但是,由于缺乏对健康、安全、环境化学危害的认识,以及不适当的污水排放系统,导致实验室风险水平不断上升。
实验室活动中使用的化学品会产生工作场所和环境危害,必须对其进行评估、管理和风险缓解。开发一种评估与实验室化学品相关的健康、安全和环境风险的方法,可以帮助定义和理解潜在危害。我们的评估表明,需要提高从事化学品处理人员的风险感知能力,以防止因工作和环境污染危害而暴露。