• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颅直流电刺激运动区域可改善帕金森病患者的反应时间。

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Motor Areas Improves Reaction Time in Parkinson's Disease.

作者信息

Sadler Christin M, Kami Aline Tiemi, Nantel Julie, Lommen Jonathan, Carlsen Anthony N

机构信息

School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 14;13:913517. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.913517. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2022.913517
PMID:35775046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9237404/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to modulate cortical motor excitability and improve bradykinesia symptoms in Parkinson's disease. It is unclear how targeting different cortical motor areas with tDCS may differentially influence upper limb function for individuals diagnosed with PD.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether anodal tDCS applied separately to the primary motor cortex and the supplementary motor area would improve upper limb function for individuals with Parkinson's disease. In addition, a startling acoustic stimulus was used to differentiate between the effect of stimulation on motor preparatory and initiation processes associated with upper limb movements.

METHODS

Eleven participants with idiopathic Parkinson's disease performed two upper limb simple reaction time tasks, involving elbow extension or a button press before and after either anodal tDCS or sham tDCS was applied over the primary motor cortex or supplementary motor area. A loud, startling stimulus was presented on a selection of trials to involuntarily trigger the prepared action.

RESULTS

Anodal tDCS led to improved premotor reaction time in both tasks, but this was moderated by reaction time in pre-tDCS testing, such that individuals with slower pre-tDCS reaction time showed the greatest reaction time improvements. Startle-trial reaction time was not modified following tDCS, suggesting that the stimulation primarily modulated response initiation processes.

CONCLUSION

Anodal tDCS improved response initiation speed, but only in slower reacting individuals with PD. However, no differences attributable to tDCS were observed in clinical measures of bradykinesia or kinematic variables, suggesting that reaction time may represent a more sensitive measure of some components of bradykinesia.

摘要

背景

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)已被证明可调节皮质运动兴奋性并改善帕金森病的运动迟缓症状。目前尚不清楚tDCS靶向不同的皮质运动区域如何对被诊断为帕金森病的个体的上肢功能产生不同影响。

目的

本研究调查分别应用阳极tDCS于初级运动皮层和辅助运动区是否会改善帕金森病患者的上肢功能。此外,使用一种令人吃惊的听觉刺激来区分刺激对与上肢运动相关的运动准备和启动过程的影响。

方法

11名特发性帕金森病患者在阳极tDCS或假tDCS应用于初级运动皮层或辅助运动区之前和之后,执行两项上肢简单反应时间任务,包括肘部伸展或按键。在一些试验中呈现响亮、令人吃惊的刺激以非自愿地触发准备好的动作。

结果

阳极tDCS在两项任务中均导致运动前反应时间改善,但这受到tDCS测试前反应时间的调节,使得tDCS测试前反应时间较慢的个体反应时间改善最大。tDCS后惊跳试验反应时间未改变,表明刺激主要调节反应启动过程。

结论

阳极tDCS改善了反应启动速度,但仅在反应较慢的帕金森病个体中。然而,在运动迟缓的临床测量或运动学变量中未观察到tDCS所致的差异,表明反应时间可能是运动迟缓某些成分的更敏感指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0658/9237404/2cb4074d9e10/fneur-13-913517-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0658/9237404/df5b81cde9e9/fneur-13-913517-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0658/9237404/2d15abd00043/fneur-13-913517-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0658/9237404/09e03703d963/fneur-13-913517-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0658/9237404/7ef40dd00162/fneur-13-913517-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0658/9237404/2cb4074d9e10/fneur-13-913517-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0658/9237404/df5b81cde9e9/fneur-13-913517-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0658/9237404/2d15abd00043/fneur-13-913517-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0658/9237404/09e03703d963/fneur-13-913517-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0658/9237404/7ef40dd00162/fneur-13-913517-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0658/9237404/2cb4074d9e10/fneur-13-913517-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Motor Areas Improves Reaction Time in Parkinson's Disease.经颅直流电刺激运动区域可改善帕金森病患者的反应时间。
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 14;13:913517. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.913517. eCollection 2022.
2
Transcranial direct current stimulation of supplementary motor area improves upper limb kinematics in Parkinson's disease.经颅直流电刺激辅助运动区改善帕金森病患者的上肢运动学。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Nov;132(11):2907-2915. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.06.031. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
3
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on gait in people with Parkinson's disease: study protocol for a randomized, controlled clinical trial.经颅直流电刺激对帕金森病患者步态的影响:一项随机对照临床试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Nov 29;19(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2982-z.
4
Transcranial direct current stimulation over the supplementary motor area modulates the preparatory activation level in the human motor system.经颅直流电刺激辅助运动区可调节人类运动系统中的准备激活水平。
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Feb 15;279:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
5
The effects of anodal tDCS over the supplementary motor area on gait initiation in Parkinson's disease with freezing of gait: a pilot study.经额部重复经颅直流电刺激对伴冻结步态的帕金森病患者起始步行的影响:一项初步研究。
J Neurol. 2018 Sep;265(9):2023-2032. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8953-1. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
6
Does transcranial direct current stimulation during writing alleviate upper limb freezing in people with Parkinson's disease? A pilot study.经颅直流电刺激在书写过程中是否能减轻帕金森病患者的上肢冻结现象?一项初步研究。
Hum Mov Sci. 2019 Jun;65. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
7
Single session transcranial direct current stimulation to the primary motor cortex fails to enhance early motor sequence learning in Parkinson's disease.单次经颅直流电刺激初级运动皮层未能增强帕金森病患者的早期运动序列学习。
Behav Brain Res. 2022 Feb 10;418:113624. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113624. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
8
Effects of More-Affected vs. Less-Affected Motor Cortex tDCS in Parkinson's Disease.在帕金森病中,受影响程度较高与较低的运动皮层经颅直流电刺激的效果比较
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 12;11:309. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00309. eCollection 2017.
9
Effects of anodal tDCS of the lower limb M1 on ankle reaction time in young adults.阳极经颅直流电刺激下肢运动皮层对年轻成年人踝关节反应时间的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Feb;234(2):377-85. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4470-y.
10
The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on upper limb motor performance in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review.经颅直流电刺激对帕金森病患者上肢运动功能的影响:系统评价。
J Neurol. 2020 Dec;267(12):3479-3488. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09385-y. Epub 2019 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcranial direct current stimulation for Parkinson's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of motor and cognitive effects.经颅直流电刺激治疗帕金森病:运动和认知效应的系统评价与荟萃分析
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2024 Nov 6;10(1):214. doi: 10.1038/s41531-024-00821-z.
2
Neural-Targeted Rehabilitation Strategies to Address Neuroplasticity After Joint Injury.针对关节损伤后神经可塑性的神经靶向康复策略。
J Athl Train. 2024 Dec 1;59(12):1187-1196. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0215.23.
3
Assessment of noninvasive brain stimulation interventions in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Transcranial direct current stimulation of supplementary motor area improves upper limb kinematics in Parkinson's disease.经颅直流电刺激辅助运动区改善帕金森病患者的上肢运动学。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Nov;132(11):2907-2915. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.06.031. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
2
Startle and the StartReact Effect: Physiological Mechanisms.惊跳反射和 StartReact 效应:生理机制。
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Nov;36(6):452-459. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000582.
3
Does transcranial direct current stimulation improve functional locomotion in people with Parkinson's disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
评估非侵入性脑刺激干预帕金森病的效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 20;14(1):14219. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64196-0.
4
Exploring the Frontiers of Neuroimaging: A Review of Recent Advances in Understanding Brain Functioning and Disorders.探索神经影像学前沿:关于理解脑功能与疾病的近期进展综述
Life (Basel). 2023 Jun 29;13(7):1472. doi: 10.3390/life13071472.
5
Editorial: Advances in rehabilitation for motor symptoms in neurodegenerative disease.社论:神经退行性疾病运动症状康复的进展
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Feb 16;17:1107061. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1107061. eCollection 2023.
经颅直流电刺激是否能改善帕金森病患者的功能性运动?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Jul 8;16(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0562-4.
4
The effects of anodal tDCS over the supplementary motor area on gait initiation in Parkinson's disease with freezing of gait: a pilot study.经额部重复经颅直流电刺激对伴冻结步态的帕金森病患者起始步行的影响:一项初步研究。
J Neurol. 2018 Sep;265(9):2023-2032. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8953-1. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
5
Does transcranial direct current stimulation during writing alleviate upper limb freezing in people with Parkinson's disease? A pilot study.经颅直流电刺激在书写过程中是否能减轻帕金森病患者的上肢冻结现象?一项初步研究。
Hum Mov Sci. 2019 Jun;65. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
6
Poststimulation time interval-dependent effects of motor cortex anodal tDCS on reaction-time task performance.运动皮层阳极经颅直流电刺激对反应时任务表现的刺激后时间间隔依赖性效应。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Feb;18(1):167-175. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0561-0.
7
Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.低强度经颅电刺激:安全、伦理、法律监管及应用指南
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1774-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
8
Effects of More-Affected vs. Less-Affected Motor Cortex tDCS in Parkinson's Disease.在帕金森病中,受影响程度较高与较低的运动皮层经颅直流电刺激的效果比较
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 12;11:309. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00309. eCollection 2017.
9
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the supplementary motor area (SMA) influences performance on motor tasks.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)作用于辅助运动区(SMA)会影响运动任务的表现。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Mar;235(3):851-859. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4848-5. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
10
Supplementary motor area as key structure for domain-general sequence processing: A unified account.补充运动区作为域普遍序列处理的关键结构:一个统一的解释。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Jan;72:28-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.10.033. Epub 2016 Nov 14.