Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Université Côte d'Azur, LAMHESS, Nice, France.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Dec 1;43(17):5281-5295. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26002. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
Orienting in space requires the processing of visual spatial cues. The dominant hypothesis about the brain structures mediating the coding of spatial cues stipulates the existence of a hippocampal-dependent system for the representation of geometry and a striatal-dependent system for the representation of landmarks. However, this dual-system hypothesis is based on paradigms that presented spatial cues conveying either conflicting or ambiguous spatial information and that used the term landmark to refer to both discrete three-dimensional objects and wall features. Here, we test the hypothesis of complex activation patterns in the hippocampus and the striatum during visual coding. We also postulate that object-based and feature-based navigation are not equivalent instances of landmark-based navigation. We examined how the neural networks associated with geometry-, object-, and feature-based spatial navigation compared with a control condition in a two-choice behavioral paradigm using fMRI. We showed that the hippocampus was involved in all three types of cue-based navigation, whereas the striatum was more strongly recruited in the presence of geometric cues than object or feature cues. We also found that unique, specific neural signatures were associated with each spatial cue. Object-based navigation elicited a widespread pattern of activity in temporal and occipital regions relative to feature-based navigation. These findings extend the current view of a dual, juxtaposed hippocampal-striatal system for visual spatial coding in humans. They also provide novel insights into the neural networks mediating object versus feature spatial coding, suggesting a need to distinguish these two types of landmarks in the context of human navigation.
在空间中定向需要处理视觉空间线索。关于介导空间线索编码的大脑结构的主导假设规定,存在一个海马体依赖的系统来表示几何形状,以及一个纹状体依赖的系统来表示地标。然而,这种双重系统假设是基于呈现传达冲突或模棱两可空间信息的空间线索的范式,并且使用术语地标来指代离散的三维物体和墙壁特征。在这里,我们测试了在视觉编码过程中海马体和纹状体中复杂激活模式的假设。我们还假设基于对象和特征的导航与基于地标导航不是等效的实例。我们使用 fMRI 在一个二选一行为范式中检查了与基于几何、基于对象和基于特征的空间导航相关的神经网络如何与对照条件进行比较。我们表明,海马体参与了所有三种基于线索的导航类型,而纹状体在存在几何线索时比对象或特征线索更强烈地招募。我们还发现,每个空间线索都与独特的、特定的神经特征相关联。与基于特征的导航相比,基于对象的导航在颞叶和枕叶区域引起了广泛的活动模式。这些发现扩展了当前关于人类视觉空间编码的双重、并列海马体-纹状体系统的观点。它们还为介导对象与特征空间编码的神经网络提供了新的见解,表明在人类导航的背景下需要区分这两种类型的地标。