Suppr超能文献

特发性肺动脉高压表型分析:一项注册研究分析。

Phenotyping of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: a registry analysis.

机构信息

Clinic of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, member of the German Center of Lung Research (DZL), Germany.

Sheffield Pulmonary Vascular Disease Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital and Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Oct;10(10):937-948. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00097-2. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Among patients meeting diagnostic criteria for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), there is an emerging lung phenotype characterised by a low diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and a smoking history. The present study aimed at a detailed characterisation of these patients.

METHODS

We analysed data from two European pulmonary hypertension registries, COMPERA (launched in 2007) and ASPIRE (from 2001 onwards), to identify patients diagnosed with IPAH and a lung phenotype defined by a DLCO of less than 45% predicted and a smoking history. We compared patient characteristics, response to therapy, and survival of these patients to patients with classical IPAH (defined by the absence of cardiopulmonary comorbidities and a DLCO of 45% or more predicted) and patients with pulmonary hypertension due to lung disease (group 3 pulmonary hypertension).

FINDINGS

The analysis included 128 (COMPERA) and 185 (ASPIRE) patients with classical IPAH, 268 (COMPERA) and 139 (ASPIRE) patients with IPAH and a lung phenotype, and 910 (COMPERA) and 375 (ASPIRE) patients with pulmonary hypertension due to lung disease. Most patients with IPAH and a lung phenotype had normal or near normal spirometry, a severe reduction in DLCO, with the majority having no or a mild degree of parenchymal lung involvement on chest computed tomography. Patients with IPAH and a lung phenotype (median age, 72 years [IQR 65-78] in COMPERA and 71 years [65-76] in ASPIRE) and patients with group 3 pulmonary hypertension (median age 71 years [65-77] in COMPERA and 69 years [63-74] in ASPIRE) were older than those with classical IPAH (median age, 45 years [32-60] in COMPERA and 52 years [38-64] in ASPIRE; p<0·0001 for IPAH with a lung phenotype vs classical IPAH in both registries). While 99 (77%) patients in COMPERA and 133 (72%) patients in ASPIRE with classical IPAH were female, there was a lower proportion of female patients in the IPAH and a lung phenotype cohort (95 [35%] COMPERA; 75 [54%] ASPIRE), which was similar to group 3 pulmonary hypertension (336 [37%] COMPERA; 148 [39%] ASPIRE]). Response to pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies at first follow-up was available from COMPERA. Improvements in WHO functional class were observed in 54% of patients with classical IPAH, 26% of patients with IPAH with a lung phenotype, and 22% of patients with group 3 pulmonary hypertension (p<0·0001 for classical IPAH vs IPAH and a lung phenotype, and p=0·194 for IPAH and a lung phenotype vs group 3 pulmonary hypertension); median improvements in 6 min walking distance were 63 m, 25 m, and 23 m for these cohorts respectively (p=0·0015 for classical IPAH vs IPAH and a lung phenotype, and p=0·64 for IPAH and a lung phenotype vs group 3 pulmonary hypertension), and median reductions in N-terminal-pro-brain-natriuretic-peptide were 58%, 27%, and 16% respectively (p=0·0043 for classical IPAH vs IPAH and a lung phenotype, and p=0·14 for IPAH and a lung phenotype vs group 3 pulmonary hypertension). In both registries, survival of patients with IPAH and a lung phenotype (1 year, 89% in COMPERA and 79% in ASPIRE; 5 years, 31% in COMPERA and 21% in ASPIRE) and group 3 pulmonary hypertension (1 year, 78% in COMPERA and 64% in ASPIRE; 5 years, 26% in COMPERA and 18% in ASPIRE) was worse than survival of patients with classical IPAH (1 year, 95% in COMPERA and 98% in ASPIRE; 5 years, 84% in COMPERA and 80% in ASPIRE; p<0·0001 for IPAH with a lung phenotype vs classical IPAH in both registries).

INTERPRETATION

A cohort of patients meeting diagnostic criteria for IPAH with a distinct, presumably smoking-related form of pulmonary hypertension accompanied by a low DLCO, resemble patients with pulmonary hypertension due to lung disease rather than classical IPAH. These observations have pathogenetic, diagnostic, and therapeutic implications, which require further exploration.

FUNDING

COMPERA is funded by unrestricted grants from Acceleron, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and OMT. The ASPIRE Registry is supported by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.

摘要

背景

在符合特发性肺动脉高压 (IPAH) 诊断标准的患者中,存在一种新兴的肺部表型,其特征为一氧化碳弥散量 (DLCO) 降低和吸烟史。本研究旨在对这些患者进行详细的特征描述。

方法

我们分析了两个欧洲肺动脉高压注册中心(COMPERA(于 2007 年启动)和 ASPIRE(从 2001 年开始)的数据,以确定被诊断为 IPAH 且存在 DLCO 低于 45%预测值和吸烟史的肺部表型患者。我们比较了这些患者的特征、对治疗的反应和生存情况与具有经典 IPAH(无心肺合并症和 DLCO 为 45%或更高)和由肺部疾病引起的肺动脉高压(第 3 组肺动脉高压)患者的特征、对治疗的反应和生存情况。

结果

分析包括 128 例(COMPERA)和 185 例(ASPIRE)具有经典 IPAH 的患者、268 例(COMPERA)和 139 例(ASPIRE)具有 IPAH 和肺部表型的患者以及 910 例(COMPERA)和 375 例(ASPIRE)由肺部疾病引起的肺动脉高压患者。大多数具有 IPAH 和肺部表型的患者的肺功能检查正常或接近正常,DLCO 严重降低,其中大多数患者的胸部 CT 无或仅有轻度肺实质受累。具有 IPAH 和肺部表型的患者(COMPERA 中位数年龄 72 岁[IQR 65-78],ASPIRE 中位数年龄 71 岁[65-76])和第 3 组肺动脉高压患者(COMPERA 中位数年龄 71 岁[65-77],ASPIRE 中位数年龄 69 岁[63-74])比具有经典 IPAH 的患者年龄更大(COMPERA 中位数年龄 45 岁[32-60],ASPIRE 中位数年龄 52 岁[38-64];p<0.0001)。在 COMPERA 中有 99(77%)例和 ASPIRE 中有 133(72%)例具有经典 IPAH 的患者为女性,而 IPAH 和肺部表型组中女性患者的比例较低(COMPERA 中 95 例[35%],ASPIRE 中 75 例[54%]),这与第 3 组肺动脉高压相似(COMPERA 中 336 例[37%],ASPIRE 中 148 例[39%])。首次随访时的肺动脉高压治疗反应可从 COMPERA 获得。54%的经典 IPAH 患者、26%的 IPAH 和肺部表型患者以及 22%的第 3 组肺动脉高压患者的 WHO 功能分类得到改善(经典 IPAH 与 IPAH 和肺部表型相比,p<0.0001,与第 3 组肺动脉高压相比,p=0.194);这些队列的 6 分钟步行距离分别改善了 63 米、25 米和 23 米(经典 IPAH 与 IPAH 和肺部表型相比,p=0.0015,与第 3 组肺动脉高压相比,p=0.64),N 端脑利钠肽前体分别降低了 58%、27%和 16%(经典 IPAH 与 IPAH 和肺部表型相比,p=0.0043,与第 3 组肺动脉高压相比,p=0.14)。在两个注册中心中,IPA 和肺部表型(1 年时,COMPERA 中为 89%,ASPIRE 中为 79%;5 年时,COMPERA 中为 31%,ASPIRE 中为 21%)和第 3 组肺动脉高压(1 年时,COMPERA 中为 78%,ASPIRE 中为 64%;5 年时,COMPERA 中为 26%,ASPIRE 中为 18%)的患者生存率均差于经典 IPAH 的患者(1 年时,COMPERA 中为 95%,ASPIRE 中为 98%;5 年时,COMPERA 中为 84%,ASPIRE 中为 80%;与两个注册中心中的经典 IPAH 相比,p<0.0001)。

结论

符合 IPAH 诊断标准且具有明显的、推测与吸烟相关的肺动脉高压和低 DLCO 的患者队列,与由肺部疾病引起的肺动脉高压患者而不是经典 IPAH 患者更相似。这些观察结果具有发病机制、诊断和治疗意义,需要进一步探讨。

资金

COMPERA 由 Acceleron、Bayer、GlaxoSmithKline、Janssen 和 OMT 提供的无限制赠款资助。ASPIRE 登记处由谢菲尔德教学医院 NHS 基金会信托基金(英国谢菲尔德)支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4076/9514996/5baf74be8eef/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验