患者偏好预测器与高阶偏好引发的异议。
The Patient preference predictor and the objection from higher-order preferences.
作者信息
Mainz Jakob Thrane
机构信息
Department of Philosophy and History of Ideas, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 2023 Mar;49(3):221-222. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108427. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
Recently, Jardas have convincingly defended the patient preference predictor (PPP) against a range of autonomy-based objections. In this response, I propose a new autonomy-based objection to the PPP that is not explicitly discussed by Jardas I call it the 'objection from higher-order preferences'. Even if this objection is not sufficient reason to reject the PPP, the objection constitutes a pro tanto reason that is at least as powerful as the ones discussed by Jardas
最近，雅尔达斯令人信服地为患者偏好预测器（PPP）辩护，反驳了一系列基于自主性的反对意见。在本回应中，我提出了一个未被雅尔达斯明确讨论过的基于自主性的对PPP的新反对意见。我将其称为“来自高阶偏好的反对意见”。即使这个反对意见并非拒绝PPP的充分理由，但它构成了一个至少与雅尔达斯所讨论的那些理由同样有力的初步理由。
Zotero 插件