Balch Jeremy A, Chatham A Hayes, Hong Philip K W, Manganiello Lauren, Baskaran Naveen, Bihorac Azra, Shickel Benjamin, Moseley Ray E, Loftus Tyler J
Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Nov 5;7:1477447. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1477447. eCollection 2024.
The algorithmic patient preference predictor (PPP) has been proposed to aid in decision making for incapacitated patients in the absence of advanced directives. Ethical and legal challenges aside, multiple practical barriers exist for building a personalized PPP. Here, we examine previous work using machine learning to predict patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for capacitated patients undergoing diverse procedures, therapies, and life events. Demonstrating robust performance in predicting PROMs for capacitated patients could suggest opportunities for developing a model tailored to incapacitated ones.
We performed a scoping review of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines to capture studies using machine learning to predict PROMs following a medical event alongside qualitative studies exploring a theoretical PPP.
Sixty-eight studies used machine learning to evaluate PROMs; an additional 20 studies focused on a theoretical PPP. For PROMs, orthopedic surgeries ( = 33) and spinal surgeries ( = 12) were the most common medical event. Studies used demographic ( = 30), pre-event PROMs ( = 52), comorbidities ( = 29), social determinants of health ( = 30), and intraoperative variables ( = 124) as predictors. Thirty-four different PROMs were used as the target outcome. Evaluation metrics varied by task, but performance was overall poor to moderate for the best reported scores. In models that used feature importance, pre-event PROMs were the most predictive of post-event PROMs. Fairness assessments were rare ( = 6). These findings reinforce the necessity of the integrating patient values and preferences, beyond demographic factors, to improve the development of personalized PPP models for incapacitated patients.
The primary objective of a PPP is to estimate patient-reported quality of life following an intervention. Use of machine learning to predict PROMs for patients introduces challenges and opportunities for building a personalized PPP for patients without advanced directives.
算法患者偏好预测器(PPP)已被提出,以帮助在没有预先指示的情况下为无行为能力的患者进行决策。除了伦理和法律挑战外,构建个性化PPP还存在多个实际障碍。在此,我们研究了以往使用机器学习预测接受各种手术、治疗和生活事件的有行为能力患者的患者报告结局指标(PROMs)的工作。在预测有行为能力患者的PROMs方面表现出强大性能,可能为开发适用于无行为能力患者的模型提供机会。
我们按照PRISMA-ScR指南对PubMed、Embase和Scopus进行了范围综述,以获取使用机器学习预测医疗事件后PROMs的研究以及探索理论PPP的定性研究。
68项研究使用机器学习评估PROMs;另外20项研究专注于理论PPP。对于PROMs,骨科手术(n = 33)和脊柱手术(n = 12)是最常见的医疗事件。研究将人口统计学因素(n = 30)、事件前PROMs(n = 52)、合并症(n = 29)、健康的社会决定因素(n = 30)和术中变量(n = 124)用作预测指标。34种不同的PROMs被用作目标结局。评估指标因任务而异,但就最佳报告分数而言,总体性能较差至中等。在使用特征重要性的模型中,事件前PROMs对事件后PROMs的预测性最强。公平性评估很少(n = 6)。这些发现强化了整合患者价值观和偏好(而非仅人口统计学因素)对于改善无行为能力患者个性化PPP模型开发的必要性。
PPP的主要目标是估计干预后患者报告的生活质量。使用机器学习预测有行为能力患者的PROMs为为没有预先指示的无行为能力患者构建个性化PPP带来了挑战和机遇。