Suppr超能文献

FIGO 分类系统下异常子宫出血的病因分布:超声与组织病理学联合研究。

Etiology distribution of abnormal uterine bleeding according to FIGO classification system: A combined study of ultrasound and histopathology.

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022 Jul;48(7):1913-1920. doi: 10.1111/jog.15226. Epub 2022 Apr 5.

Abstract

AIM

To classify the FIGO's PALM-COEIN etiology for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) patients according to the ultrasound and histopathology and to evaluate the etiology prevalence distribution for AUB patients.

METHODS

A total of 1065 women with AUB in the Second Hospital of Shandong University between January 2019 and March 2021. The intrauterine histopathological and ultrasound results were reviewed retrospectively.PALM-COEIN etiology classification was performed according to histopathology and ultrasound. The classification system was stratified into nine basic categories: Polyp (AUB-P), adenomyosis (AUB-A), leiomyoma (AUB-L), malignancy and hyperplasia (AUB-M), coagulopathy (AUB-C), ovulatory disorders (AUB-O), endometrium (AUB-E), Iatrogenic(AUB-I), and not classified (AUB-N). The number of cases and composition ratio were also calculated.

RESULTS

According to the FIGO's classification system, the PALM group (656,61.60%), which were defined as structural entities that can be measured visually with ultrasound and/or histopathology. 176 (16.53%) patients were classified as AUB-P,102 (9.58%) patients were classified as AUB-A, 487(45.73%) patients were classified as AUB-L, 31 (2.91%) patients were classified as AUB-M. The COEIN group (409,38.40%), which were defined as nonstructural entities that cannot be measured by ultrasound and/or histopathology. Nobody were classified as AUB-C in our group, and 383 (35.96%) patients were classified as AUB-O, 4 (0.38%) patients were classified as AUB-E,14 (1.31%) patients were classified as AUB-I,8 (0.75%) patients were classified as AUB-N.

CONCLUSION

In our study, AUB-L was the most common cause, followed by AUB-O, AUB-P, AUB-A, AUB-M, AUB-I, AUB-N, and AUB-E.PALM-COEIN etiology classification system played an important role in the epidemic and management standardization of AUB patients, provided an effective communication between physicians and researchers also. Ultrasonography was the preferred examination for AUB patients, especially with structural abnormalities.

摘要

目的

根据超声和组织病理学对妇产科国际联盟(FIGO)的 PALM-COEIN 病因进行分类,评估异常子宫出血(AUB)患者的病因流行分布。

方法

回顾性分析 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月在山东大学第二医院就诊的 1065 例 AUB 患者的宫内组织病理学和超声结果。根据组织病理学和超声进行 PALM-COEIN 病因分类。分类系统分为九个基本类别:息肉(AUB-P)、腺肌病(AUB-A)、平滑肌瘤(AUB-L)、恶性肿瘤和增生(AUB-M)、凝血障碍(AUB-C)、排卵障碍(AUB-O)、子宫内膜(AUB-E)、医源性(AUB-I)和未分类(AUB-N)。计算病例数和构成比。

结果

根据 FIGO 分类系统,PALM 组(656 例,61.60%),定义为可通过超声和/或组织病理学目视测量的结构实体。176 例(16.53%)患者被归类为 AUB-P,102 例(9.58%)患者被归类为 AUB-A,487 例(45.73%)患者被归类为 AUB-L,31 例(2.91%)患者被归类为 AUB-M。COEIN 组(409 例,38.40%),定义为无法通过超声和/或组织病理学测量的非结构实体。在我们的研究中,没有人被归类为 AUB-C,383 例(35.96%)患者被归类为 AUB-O,4 例(0.38%)患者被归类为 AUB-E,14 例(1.31%)患者被归类为 AUB-I,8 例(0.75%)患者被归类为 AUB-N。

结论

在我们的研究中,AUB-L 是最常见的原因,其次是 AUB-O、AUB-P、AUB-A、AUB-M、AUB-I、AUB-N 和 AUB-E。PALM-COEIN 病因分类系统在 AUB 患者的流行和管理标准化中发挥了重要作用,也为医生和研究人员之间提供了有效的沟通。超声检查是 AUB 患者的首选检查方法,特别是对于有结构异常的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验