Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Biology, College of Sciences and Arts, University of Jeddah, Khulais Campus, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 1;12(1):11120. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15288-2.
The latest coronavirus pandemic (SARS-CoV-2) poses an exceptional threat to human health and society worldwide. The coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) spike (S) protein, which is required for viral-host cell penetration, might be considered a promising and suitable target for treatment. In this study, we utilized the nonalkaloid fraction of the medicinal plant Rhazya stricta to computationally investigate its antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations were the main tools used to examine the binding interactions of the compounds isolated by HPLC analysis. Ceftazidime was utilized as a reference control, which showed high potency against the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) in an in vitro study. The five compounds (CID:1, CID:2, CID:3, CID:4, and CID:5) exhibited remarkable binding affinities (CID:1, - 8.9; CID:2, - 8.7; and CID:3, 4, and 5, - 8.5 kcal/mol) compared to the control compound (- 6.2 kcal/mol). MD simulations over a period of 200 ns further corroborated that certain interactions occurred with the five compounds and the nonalkaloidal compounds retained their positions within the RBD active site. CID:2, CID:4, and CID:5 demonstrated high stability and less variance, while CID:1 and CID:3 were less stable than ceftazidime. The average number of hydrogen bonds formed per timeframe by CID:1, CID:2, CID:3, and CID:5 (0.914, 0.451, 1.566, and 1.755, respectively) were greater than that formed by ceftazidime (0.317). The total binding free energy calculations revealed that the five compounds interacted more strongly within RBD residues (CID:1 = - 68.8, CID:2 = - 71.6, CID:3 = - 74.9, CID:4 = - 75.4, CID:5 = - 60.9 kJ/mol) than ceftazidime (- 34.5 kJ/mol). The drug-like properties of the selected compounds were relatively similar to those of ceftazidime, and the toxicity predictions categorized these compounds into less toxic classes. Structural similarity and functional group analyses suggested that the presence of more H-acceptor atoms, electronegative atoms, acidic oxygen groups, and nitrogen atoms in amide or aromatic groups were common among the compounds with the lowest binding affinities. In conclusion, this in silico work predicts for the first time the potential of using five R. stricta nonalkaloid compounds as a treatment strategy to control SARS-CoV-2 viral entry.
最新的冠状病毒大流行(SARS-CoV-2)对全球人类健康和社会构成了特殊威胁。冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)的刺突(S)蛋白是病毒与宿主细胞穿透所必需的,它可能被视为一种有希望和合适的治疗靶标。在这项研究中,我们利用药用植物瑞香狼毒的非生物碱部分,通过计算研究其对 SARS-CoV-2 的抗病毒活性。分子对接和分子动力学模拟是用于检查通过 HPLC 分析分离的化合物结合相互作用的主要工具。头孢他啶被用作参考对照,在体外研究中,它对 SARS-CoV-2 受体结合域(RBD)显示出高活性。与对照化合物(-6.2 kcal/mol)相比,五种化合物(CID:1、CID:2、CID:3、CID:4 和 CID:5)表现出显著的结合亲和力(CID:1,-8.9;CID:2,-8.7;CID:3,4 和 5,-8.5 kcal/mol)。在 200 ns 的 MD 模拟进一步证实,某些相互作用发生在五种化合物和非生物碱化合物与 RBD 活性位点内。CID:2、CID:4 和 CID:5 表现出高稳定性和较小的变化,而 CID:1 和 CID:3 比头孢他啶不稳定。CID:1、CID:2、CID:3 和 CID:5 每个时间框架形成的氢键平均数量(0.914、0.451、1.566 和 1.755)大于头孢他啶(0.317)。总结合自由能计算表明,五种化合物在 RBD 残基内相互作用更强(CID:1 = -68.8,CID:2 = -71.6,CID:3 = -74.9,CID:4 = -75.4,CID:5 = -60.9 kJ/mol)比头孢他啶(-34.5 kJ/mol)更强。所选化合物的类药性相对类似于头孢他啶,毒性预测将这些化合物分类为毒性较小的类别。结构相似性和功能基团分析表明,具有最低结合亲和力的化合物中共同存在更多的 H 受体原子、电负性原子、酸性氧基团和酰胺或芳基中的氮原子。总之,这项计算机研究首次预测了使用五种瑞香狼毒非生物碱化合物作为控制 SARS-CoV-2 病毒进入的治疗策略的潜力。