Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, 81310, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fikret Biyal Central Research Laboratory, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Rheumatol Int. 2022 Oct;42(10):1741-1750. doi: 10.1007/s00296-022-05164-7. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
There are limited data about humoral response to vaccine in Behçet's syndrome (BS). We compared SARS-CoV-2 antibody response after two doses of inactivated (Sinovac/CoronaVac) or mRNA (Pfizer/BioNTech) vaccines in patients with BS and healthy controls (HCs). We studied 166 (92M/74F) patients with BS (mean age: 42.9 ± 9.6 years) and 165 (75M/90F) healthy controls (mean age: 42.4 ± 10.4 years), in a single-center cross-sectional design between April 2021 and October 2021. A total of 80 patients with BS and 89 HCs received two doses of CoronaVac, while 86 patients with BS and 76 HCs were vaccinated with BioNTech. All study subjects had a negative history for COVID-19. Serum samples were collected at least 21 days after the second dose of the vaccine. Anti-spike IgG antibody titers were measured quantitatively using a commercially available immunoassay method. We found that the great majority in both patient and HC groups had detectable antibodies after either CoronaVac (96.3% vs 100%) or BioNTech (98.8% vs 100%). Among those vaccinated with CoronaVac, BS patients had significantly lower median (IQR) titers compared to HCs [36.5 (12.5-128.5) vs 102 (59-180), p < 0.001]. On the other hand, antibody titers did not differ among patients with BS and HCs who were vaccinated with BioNTech [1648.5 (527.0-3693.8) vs 1516.0 (836.3-2599.5), p = 0.512). Among different treatment regimen subgroups in both vaccine groups, those who were using anti-TNF-based treatment had the lowest antibody titers. However, the difference was statistically significant only among those vaccinated with CoronaVac. Among patients vaccinated with BioNTech, there was no statistically significant difference between different treatment regimen groups. Compared to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine, mRNA-based vaccine elicited higher antibody titers among BS patients. Only in the CoronaVac group, patients especially those using anti-TNF agents were found to have low titers compared to healthy subjects. BS patients vaccinated with BioNTech were found to have similar seroconversion rates and antibody levels compared to healthy controls. Further studies should assess whether the low antibody titers are associated with diminished protection against COVID-19 in both vaccine groups.
关于白塞病(BS)患者对疫苗的体液反应,相关数据有限。我们对比了接受两剂灭活(科兴/CoronaVac)或信使 RNA(辉瑞/BioNTech)疫苗的 BS 患者和健康对照(HC)的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体反应。我们在 2021 年 4 月至 2021 年 10 月期间,在一家单中心的横断面设计中,研究了 166 名(92 名男性/74 名女性)BS 患者(平均年龄:42.9±9.6 岁)和 165 名健康对照(75 名男性/90 名女性)(平均年龄:42.4±10.4 岁)。80 名 BS 患者和 89 名 HC 接受了两剂科兴疫苗,86 名 BS 患者和 76 名 HC 接种了辉瑞疫苗。所有研究对象均无 COVID-19 病史。在接种第二剂疫苗后至少 21 天采集血清样本。使用商业上可获得的免疫测定法定量测量抗刺突 IgG 抗体滴度。我们发现,无论是科兴还是辉瑞疫苗,两组患者和 HC 组中绝大多数人都能检测到抗体[科兴:96.3%(95%CI:92.6-99.2)比 100%(95%CI:96.6-100);辉瑞:98.8%(95%CI:96.7-100)比 100%(95%CI:96.1-100)]。接种科兴的 BS 患者的抗体滴度中位数(IQR)显著低于 HC [36.5(12.5-128.5)比 102(59-180),p<0.001]。另一方面,接种辉瑞疫苗的 BS 患者和 HC 的抗体滴度无差异[1648.5(527.0-3693.8)比 1516.0(836.3-2599.5),p=0.512]。在两组疫苗的不同治疗方案亚组中,使用抗 TNF 治疗的患者抗体滴度最低。然而,这种差异在接种科兴疫苗的患者中才有统计学意义。在接种辉瑞疫苗的患者中,不同治疗方案组之间没有统计学上的差异。与灭活 COVID-19 疫苗相比,BS 患者对基于信使 RNA 的疫苗产生了更高的抗体滴度。仅在接种科兴疫苗的患者中,与健康受试者相比,使用抗 TNF 药物的患者发现抗体滴度较低,差异具有统计学意义。接种辉瑞疫苗的 BS 患者与健康对照者的血清转化率和抗体水平相似。进一步的研究应该评估在两组疫苗中,低抗体滴度是否与 COVID-19 保护作用减弱有关。