Tikuisis P, Madill H D, Gill B J, Lewis W F, Cox K M, Kane D M
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1987 Mar;48(3):208-13. doi: 10.1080/15298668791384643.
Fifteen healthy young males, nine at rest and six at exercise, were exposed to high transient levels of carbon monoxide (CO) to simulate the breathing environment measured in an armored vehicle during weapons firing. Depending on the dosage, the CO exposures raised the subjects' carboxyhemoglobin saturation (%COHb) from 1.7% to 17.3%. The measured %COHb levels compared favorably (regression coefficient, b = 1.04) to those predicted by the theoretical model of Coburn et al. When the application of this same model by a method proposed by NIOSH was used, however, a significant overprediction was found (b = 1.28). It appears that this overprediction results primarily from the omission of water vapor in the lungs when the inspired pressure of CO is considered, and to the use of incorrect values for alveolar ventilation. These results demonstrate the errors that may arise from the incorrect utilization of the equation by Coburn et al. and the effect that this may have upon the calculation of the limits for safe occupational exposure to CO.
15名健康年轻男性,9人处于静息状态,6人处于运动状态,他们暴露于高瞬态水平的一氧化碳(CO)中,以模拟武器射击时装甲车内测量的呼吸环境。根据剂量不同,CO暴露使受试者的碳氧血红蛋白饱和度(%COHb)从1.7%升至17.3%。实测的%COHb水平与Coburn等人的理论模型预测值相比良好(回归系数,b = 1.04)。然而,当采用美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)提出的方法应用该同一模型时,发现存在显著的过度预测(b = 1.28)。看来这种过度预测主要是由于在考虑吸入CO压力时肺部水蒸气的遗漏,以及肺泡通气使用了不正确的值。这些结果证明了Coburn等人的方程使用不当可能产生的误差,以及这可能对CO安全职业暴露限值计算产生的影响。