Presno Linera Miguel Ángel
Departamento de Derecho Público, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, España.
Gac Sanit. 2022;36 Suppl 1:S105-S108. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2022.05.003.
The aim of this paper is to explore the legal tools the Spanish constitutional system holds to face a health crisis as serious in its scope and consequences and as lengthy in time such as that of the COVID-19 pandemic. First, we explain the state of alarm provided for in Organic Law 4/1981, 1st June, regulating the states of alarm, exception and siege; then, the provisions included in Organic Law 3/1986, on extraordinary measures in the field of public health. Both regulations have been the legal basis to adopt different state and regional health measures during this almost year and a half of the pandemic. The last July 14, the Spanish Constitutional Court made public the appeal of unconstitutionality lodged by more than fifty deputies of the Vox parliamentary group against Royal Decree 463/2020, of March 14 (articles 7, 9, 10 and 11), by which the state of alarm was declared for the management of the health crisis caused by COVID-19 and several regulations that modified that Decree or extended it. This judgement suggests a different legal response -the declaration of the state of exception- to deal with the health crisis and be critically analyzed in third place.
本文旨在探讨西班牙宪法体系所拥有的法律工具,以应对像新冠疫情这样在范围和后果上都极为严重且持续时间漫长的健康危机。首先,我们解释1981年6月1日第4号组织法中规定的警报状态,该法对警报、例外和戒严状态进行了规范;接着,阐述1986年第3号组织法中关于公共卫生领域特别措施的规定。在这近一年半的疫情期间,这两项法规一直是国家和地区采取不同卫生措施的法律依据。去年7月14日,西班牙宪法法院公布了沃克斯议会党团五十多名议员针对3月14日第463/2020号皇家法令(第7、9、10和11条)提起的违宪上诉,该法令宣布进入警报状态以应对新冠疫情引发的健康危机以及多项对该法令进行修改或延期的规定。这一判决提出了一种不同的法律应对方式——宣布进入例外状态——来应对健康危机,将在第三部分进行批判性分析。