• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[The constitutional framework for collective health protection measures in the face of pandemics. SESPAS Report 2022].[面对大流行时集体健康保护措施的宪法框架。西班牙国家公共卫生与分析中心报告2022]
Gac Sanit. 2022;36 Suppl 1:S105-S108. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2022.05.003.
2
Collision of Fundamental Human Rights and the Right to Health Access During the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic.在新型冠状病毒大流行期间,基本人权与健康权的冲突。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 8;8:570243. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.570243. eCollection 2020.
3
[Individual rights vs public health in the fight against contagious diseases: proposals to improve the current legal framework].[抗击传染病斗争中的个人权利与公共卫生:完善现行法律框架的建议]
Gac Sanit. 2016 Nov;30 Suppl 1:69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.04.021.
4
[The competence of health authorities to take restrict measures on rights in a situation of health crisis].[卫生当局在卫生危机情况下对权利采取限制措施的权限]
Gac Sanit. 2022 Jan-Feb;36(1):37-40. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
5
Human rights, public health and COVID-19 in Canada.加拿大的人权、公共卫生与 COVID-19
Can J Public Health. 2020 Dec;111(6):975-979. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00408-0. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
6
[Prioritization of health resources in contexts of scarcity. SESPAS Report 2022].[稀缺情况下卫生资源的优先排序。西班牙国家卫生系统报告2022]
Gac Sanit. 2022;36 Suppl 1:S51-S55. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2022.04.003.
7
[Nudges and the pandemic: An analysis from economics and behavioural law. SESPAS Report 2022].[助推与疫情:经济学和行为法学分析。西班牙公共卫生与健康研究所2022年报告]
Gac Sanit. 2022;36 Suppl 1:S93-S96. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2022.03.004.
8
Crisis Decision-Making at the Speed of COVID-19: Field Report on Issuing the First Regional Shelter-in-Place Orders in the United States.新冠疫情下的危机决策:美国首次发布地区就地避难令的实地报告。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021 Jan/Feb;27 Suppl 1, COVID-19 and Public Health: Looking Back, Moving Forward:S19-S28. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001292.
9
Changing legislative thinking in China to better protect wild animals and human health.改变中国的立法思路,更好地保护野生动物和人类健康。
Conserv Biol. 2022 Feb;36(1):e13837. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13837. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
10
[Biomedical research and innovation and COVID-19 syndemic. SESPAS Report 2022].[生物医学研究与创新及新冠疫情综合征。西班牙公共卫生与社会服务部2022年报告]
Gac Sanit. 2022;36 Suppl 1:S87-S92. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2022.02.004.

[面对大流行时集体健康保护措施的宪法框架。西班牙国家公共卫生与分析中心报告2022]

[The constitutional framework for collective health protection measures in the face of pandemics. SESPAS Report 2022].

作者信息

Presno Linera Miguel Ángel

机构信息

Departamento de Derecho Público, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, España.

出版信息

Gac Sanit. 2022;36 Suppl 1:S105-S108. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2022.05.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.gaceta.2022.05.003
PMID:35781141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9244664/
Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore the legal tools the Spanish constitutional system holds to face a health crisis as serious in its scope and consequences and as lengthy in time such as that of the COVID-19 pandemic. First, we explain the state of alarm provided for in Organic Law 4/1981, 1st June, regulating the states of alarm, exception and siege; then, the provisions included in Organic Law 3/1986, on extraordinary measures in the field of public health. Both regulations have been the legal basis to adopt different state and regional health measures during this almost year and a half of the pandemic. The last July 14, the Spanish Constitutional Court made public the appeal of unconstitutionality lodged by more than fifty deputies of the Vox parliamentary group against Royal Decree 463/2020, of March 14 (articles 7, 9, 10 and 11), by which the state of alarm was declared for the management of the health crisis caused by COVID-19 and several regulations that modified that Decree or extended it. This judgement suggests a different legal response -the declaration of the state of exception- to deal with the health crisis and be critically analyzed in third place.

摘要

本文旨在探讨西班牙宪法体系所拥有的法律工具,以应对像新冠疫情这样在范围和后果上都极为严重且持续时间漫长的健康危机。首先,我们解释1981年6月1日第4号组织法中规定的警报状态,该法对警报、例外和戒严状态进行了规范;接着,阐述1986年第3号组织法中关于公共卫生领域特别措施的规定。在这近一年半的疫情期间,这两项法规一直是国家和地区采取不同卫生措施的法律依据。去年7月14日,西班牙宪法法院公布了沃克斯议会党团五十多名议员针对3月14日第463/2020号皇家法令(第7、9、10和11条)提起的违宪上诉,该法令宣布进入警报状态以应对新冠疫情引发的健康危机以及多项对该法令进行修改或延期的规定。这一判决提出了一种不同的法律应对方式——宣布进入例外状态——来应对健康危机,将在第三部分进行批判性分析。