Miller William, Jeon Sunggun, Ye Xin
The University of Mississippi, Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Neuromuscular Laboratory, University, MS, USA.
Oklahoma State University, School of Kinesiology, Applied Health and Recreation, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Sports Med Health Sci. 2020 Aug 29;2(3):141-152. doi: 10.1016/j.smhs.2020.08.002. eCollection 2020 Sep.
We compared the effects of low intensity concentric (CON) and eccentric (ECC) exercise on the force and neural responses of the dominant (exercised) elbow flexors (EFs), and studied if these conditions could induce cross-over effects to the contralateral (non-exercised) EFs. Fifteen subjects (8 males) completed all conditions (CON and ECC: 6 sets of low intensity exercise to failure; control: rest) in separate visits with a randomized order. Maximal isometric force and electromyography (EMG) of the dominant and contralateral EFs were assessed at pre, immediate-, 24-, and 48-h-post. Two-factor (condition and time) linear mixed-model analyses were performed to examine the force and EMG responses. Immediately post CON, contralateral EFs force was significantly ( = 0.026) higher (12.41%) than control, but no cross-over effects regarding the neural responses were observed. Immediately post ECC, dominant EFs force was significantly lower in ECC, compared to CON ( 0.003) and control ( < 0.001). This force remained depressed at 24- and 48-h post ECC, when compared to CON (0.001) and control ( < 0.001). Our data suggests that submaximal unilateral exercises are not likely to impair contralateral muscle strength performance. Instead, concentric exercises may acutely improve muscle strength for the contralateral limb. However, this effect is not explained by changes in muscle excitation.
我们比较了低强度向心(CON)和离心(ECC)运动对优势(运动)侧肘屈肌(EFs)力量和神经反应的影响,并研究了这些运动条件是否会对非优势(未运动)侧EFs产生交叉效应。15名受试者(8名男性)以随机顺序在不同的访视中完成了所有条件(CON和ECC:6组低强度运动至疲劳;对照组:休息)。在运动前、运动后即刻、24小时和48小时评估优势侧和非优势侧EFs的最大等长力量和肌电图(EMG)。进行双因素(运动条件和时间)线性混合模型分析以检查力量和EMG反应。CON运动后即刻,非优势侧EFs力量显著高于对照组(P = 0.026)(高12.41%),但未观察到关于神经反应的交叉效应。ECC运动后即刻,与CON组(P = 0.003)和对照组(P < 0.001)相比,ECC组优势侧EFs力量显著降低。与CON组(P = 0.001)和对照组(P < 0.001)相比,该力量在ECC运动后24小时和48小时仍处于较低水平。我们的数据表明,次最大强度的单侧运动不太可能损害对侧肌肉力量表现。相反,向心运动可能会急性改善对侧肢体的肌肉力量。然而,这种效应不能用肌肉兴奋性的变化来解释。