Rabbani Amir, Rafique Asim, Wang Xiaoyan, Campbell Danielle, Wang Daniel, Brownell Nicholas, Capdevilla Kenia, Garabedian Victoria, Chaparro Sandra, Herrera Raul, Parikh Rushi V, Ardehali Reza
Division of Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 17;9:876718. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.876718. eCollection 2022.
The impact of colchicine on hospitalized patients with Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) related cardiac injury is unknown.
In this multicenter randomized controlled open-label clinical trial, we randomized hospitalized adult patients with documented COVID-19 and evidence of cardiac injury in a 1:1 ratio to either colchicine 0.6 mg po twice daily for 30 days plus standard of care or standard of care alone. Cardiac injury was defined as elevated cardiac biomarkers, new arrhythmia, new/worsened left ventricular dysfunction, or new pericardial effusion. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, or need for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) at 90 days. Key secondary endpoints included the individual components of the primary endpoint and change in and at least 2-grade reduction in the World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale at 30 days. The trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04355143).
We enrolled 93 patients, 48 patients in the colchicine arm and 45 in the control arm. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between the colchicine and control arms (19 vs. 15%, = 0.78), nor in the individual components of all-cause mortality (17 vs. 15%, = 1.0) and need for mechanical ventilation (8 vs. 5%, = 0.68); no patients in either group required MCS. The change in (-1.8 ± 2.4 vs. -1.2 ± 2.0, = 0.12) and at least 2-grade reduction (75 vs. 75%, = 1.0) in the WHO ordinal scale was also similar between groups.
Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and evidence of cardiac injury did not benefit from colchicine therapy.
秋水仙碱对新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)相关心脏损伤住院患者的影响尚不清楚。
在这项多中心随机对照开放标签临床试验中,我们将确诊为COVID-19且有心脏损伤证据的住院成年患者按1:1比例随机分为两组,一组接受秋水仙碱0.6毫克口服,每日两次,共30天,加标准治疗;另一组仅接受标准治疗。心脏损伤定义为心脏生物标志物升高、新发心律失常、新出现/加重的左心室功能障碍或新出现的心包积液。主要终点是90天时全因死亡率、机械通气需求或机械循环支持(MCS)需求的复合终点。关键次要终点包括主要终点的各个组成部分以及30天时世界卫生组织(WHO)序贯量表的变化和至少降低2级。该试验已在clinicaltrials.gov注册(NCT04355143)。
我们纳入了93例患者,秋水仙碱组48例,对照组45例。秋水仙碱组和对照组的主要结局无显著差异(19%对15%,P = 0.78),全因死亡率的各个组成部分(17%对15%,P = 1.0)和机械通气需求(8%对5%,P = 0.68)也无显著差异;两组均无患者需要MCS。两组间WHO序贯量表的变化(-1.8±2.4对-1.2±2.0,P = 0.12)和至少降低2级(75%对75%,P = 1.0)也相似。
因COVID-19住院且有心脏损伤证据的患者未从秋水仙碱治疗中获益。