Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Institutes of Preventive Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;10:842880. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.842880. eCollection 2022.
Approximately 30% of deaths in Shanghai either occur at home or are not medically attended. The recorded cause of death (COD) in these cases may not be reliable. We applied the Smart Verbal Autopsy (VA) tool to assign the COD for a representative sample of home deaths certified by 16 community health centers (CHCs) from three districts in Shanghai, from December 2017 to June 2018. The results were compared with diagnoses from routine practice to ascertain the added value of using SmartVA. Overall, cause-specific mortality fraction (CSMF) accuracy improved from 0.93 (93%) to 0.96 after the application of SmartVA. A comparison with a "gold standard (GS)" diagnoses obtained from a parallel medical record review investigation found that 86.3% of the initial diagnoses made by the CHCs were assigned the correct COD, increasing to 90.5% after the application of SmartVA. We conclude that routine application of SmartVA is not indicated for general use in CHCs, although the tool did improve diagnostic accuracy for residual causes, such as other or ill-defined cancers and non-communicable diseases.
上海约有 30%的死亡病例发生在家庭中或未得到医疗救治。在这些情况下记录的死因(COD)可能不可靠。我们应用智能口述尸检(VA)工具,为上海三个区的 16 个社区卫生中心(CHC)认证的家庭死亡病例的代表性样本分配 COD,时间为 2017 年 12 月至 2018 年 6 月。结果与常规实践中的诊断进行了比较,以确定使用 SmartVA 的附加值。总体而言,应用 SmartVA 后,特定病因死亡率(CSMF)的准确性从 0.93(93%)提高到 0.96。与从平行病历审查调查中获得的“黄金标准(GS)”诊断的比较发现,CHC 最初做出的诊断中有 86.3%被分配了正确的 COD,应用 SmartVA 后增加到 90.5%。我们的结论是,虽然该工具确实提高了其他或未明确界定的癌症和非传染性疾病等剩余病因的诊断准确性,但 SmartVA 并未表明常规应用于 CHC 是合理的。