Suppr超能文献

在印度北部克什米尔的第二次大流行期间,对有症状和无症状患者的 SARS-CoV-2 进行快速抗原检测的诊断效用和性能。

Diagnostic utility and performance of rapid antigen test in SARS CoV- 2 in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients during the second pandemic wave in Kashmir, North India.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Srinagar, India.

Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Srinagar, India.

出版信息

Indian J Med Microbiol. 2022 Oct-Dec;40(4):572-576. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jul 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Real time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT PCR) although gold standard test for the diagnosis of SARS CoV-2, carries disadvantages of a sophisticated set up, long time to results and centralized services. The rapid antigen tests (RAT) can be used as a primary screening tool with the advantages of rapid turnaround time and ease of use. The study was conducted to determine the performance of rapid antigen test (standard Q COVID 19 Ag) in comparison to rRT PCR in symptomatic patients and asymptomatic contacts and asymptomatic patients with no apparent contact history.

METHODS

Nasopharyngeal swabs taken in duplicate from 1034 patients were collected over a 5 months period. These included 248 (23.98%) symptomatic, 386 (37.34%) asymptomatic contacts and 400 (38.68%) asymptomatic subjects who were routinely screened in pre-operative period, as a prerequisite for travel, or pregnant females. Both rRT PCR and RAT were performed as per manufacturers' instructions. Performance of test in different subgroups of patients was evaluated. Performance of RAT test on basis of duration of illness and Ct values was also analyzed.

RESULTS

In this study, 445 (43.04%) were rRT PCR positive, out of which 374 samples were RAT positive as well. 31 samples were RAT positive but PCR negative. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the rapid antigen test was 84.04%, 94.74%, 92.35% and 88.71% respectively. The negative predictive value of the test in asymptomatic patients without any significant contact history was 97.07%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study recommends the use of the antigen test as a method of diagnosis for SARS CoV-2. However a negative result with RAT in suspected patients and their contacts should be viewed with caution. This study also finds the utility of using RAT test in the community settings as a screening test in schools, colleges and mass gatherings.

摘要

目的

实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR)虽然是 SARS-CoV-2 诊断的金标准检测方法,但存在设备复杂、结果耗时和集中服务等缺点。快速抗原检测(RAT)可作为一种初步筛查工具,具有检测时间短、使用方便的优点。本研究旨在比较 rRT-PCR 检测方法,以确定快速抗原检测(标准 Q COVID-19 Ag)在有症状患者、无症状接触者和无明显接触史的无症状患者中的性能。

方法

在 5 个月的时间里,采集了来自 1034 名患者的双份鼻咽拭子。其中包括 248 名(23.98%)有症状患者、386 名(37.34%)无症状接触者和 400 名(38.68%)无症状患者,这些患者是在手术前、旅行前或孕妇常规筛查中采集的。均按制造商的说明进行 rRT-PCR 和 RAT 检测。评估了不同亚组患者的检测性能。还根据疾病持续时间和 Ct 值分析了 RAT 检测的性能。

结果

在本研究中,445 名(43.04%)rRT-PCR 检测阳性,其中 374 名 RAT 检测阳性。31 名 RAT 检测阳性而 rRT-PCR 检测阴性。快速抗原检测的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 84.04%、94.74%、92.35%和 88.71%。无明显接触史的无症状患者的阴性预测值为 97.07%。

结论

本研究建议将抗原检测作为 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断方法。然而,对于疑似患者及其接触者,应谨慎看待 RAT 检测结果为阴性。本研究还发现,在社区环境中使用 RAT 检测作为学校、学院和群众集会的筛查检测具有一定的实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9c8/9249411/a56b7a631c15/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验