• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为关系原则的合理性:儿科决策的综合框架

Reasonableness as a Relational Principle: An Integrated Framework for Pediatric Decision-Making.

作者信息

Hester D Micah, Salter Erica K

机构信息

Department of Medical Humanities & Bioethics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AR.

Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2022 Dec;251:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.06.002. Epub 2022 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.06.002
PMID:35787377
Abstract

We modified and applied the surrogate decision-making framework of Buchanan and Brock for pediatrics, and present an integrated framework of pediatric health care decision-making, specifying authority and intervention principles, 2 guidance principles, and an additional category of relational principles, governing stakeholder interactions.

摘要

我们修改并应用了布坎南和布罗克针对儿科的替代决策框架,并提出了一个儿科医疗保健决策的综合框架,明确了权威和干预原则、两项指导原则以及一类额外的关系原则,这些原则适用于利益相关者的互动。

相似文献

1
Reasonableness as a Relational Principle: An Integrated Framework for Pediatric Decision-Making.作为关系原则的合理性:儿科决策的综合框架
J Pediatr. 2022 Dec;251:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.06.002. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
2
Decision Making on Behalf of Children: Understanding the Role of the Harm Principle.代表儿童做决策:理解伤害原则的作用。
J Clin Ethics. 2019 Fall;30(3):207-212.
3
Pediatric Decision Making: Ross, Rawls, and Getting Children and Families Right.儿科决策:罗斯、罗尔斯与正确对待儿童及家庭
J Clin Ethics. 2019 Fall;30(3):240-246.
4
Better than Best (Interest Standard) in Pediatric Decision Making.儿科决策中的“优于最佳(利益标准)”
J Clin Ethics. 2019 Fall;30(3):183-195.
5
Parental Decision Making: The Best Interest Principle, Child Autonomy, and Reasonableness.父母的决策:最佳利益原则、儿童自主权与合理性。
HEC Forum. 2019 Sep;31(3):233-240. doi: 10.1007/s10730-019-09373-9.
6
Combining the best interest standard with shared decision-making in paediatrics-introducing the shared optimum approach based on a qualitative study.将儿童最佳利益标准与共同决策相结合——基于定性研究引入共同最优方法
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Mar;180(3):759-766. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03756-8. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
7
When Better Isn't Good Enough: Commentary on Ross's "Better than Best (Interest Standard) in Pediatric Decision Making".当更好还不够好时:对罗斯《儿科决策中优于最佳(利益标准)》的评论
J Clin Ethics. 2019 Fall;30(3):213-217.
8
Is it Reasonable to Demand Reasons in Pediatric Decision-Making?在儿科决策中要求提供理由是否合理?
J Pediatr. 2022 Dec;251:36-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.09.015. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
9
Guidance and Intervention Principles in Pediatrics: The Need for Pluralism.儿科指导与干预原则:多元化的必要性。
J Clin Ethics. 2019 Fall;30(3):201-206.
10
The Harm Principle Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard: Problems With Using the Harm Principle for Medical Decision Making for Children.《伤害原则不能替代最佳利益标准:用伤害原则为儿童做医疗决策存在的问题》
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Aug;18(8):9-19. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1485757.