U.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, St. Petersburg, Florida, USA.
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Sep;28(17):5294-5309. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16295. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
Coral-reef degradation is driving global-scale reductions in reef-building capacity and the ecological, geological, and socioeconomic functions it supports. The persistence of those essential functions will depend on whether coral-reef management is able to rebalance the competing processes of reef accretion and erosion. Here, we reconstructed census-based carbonate budgets of 46 reefs throughout the Florida Keys from 1996 to 2019. We evaluated the environmental and ecological drivers of changing budget states and compared historical trends in reef-accretion potential to millennial-scale baselines of accretion from reef cores and future projections with coral restoration. We found that historically, most reefs had positive carbonate budgets, and many had reef-accretion potential comparable to the ~3 mm year average accretion rate during the peak of regional reef building ~7000 years ago; however, declines in reef-building Acropora palmata and Orbicella spp. corals following a series of thermal stress events and coral disease outbreaks resulted in a shift from positive to negative budgets for most reefs in the region. By 2019, only ~15% of reefs had positive net carbonate production. Most of those reefs were in inshore, Lower Keys patch-reef habitats with low water clarity, supporting the hypothesis that environments with naturally low irradiance may provide a refugia from thermal stress. We caution that our estimated carbonate budgets are likely overly optimistic; comparison of reef-accretion potential to measured accretion from reef cores suggests that, by not accounting for the role of nonbiological physical and chemical erosion, census-based carbonate budgets may underestimate total erosion by ~1 mm year (-1.15 kg CaCO m year ). Although the present state of Florida's reefs is dire, we demonstrate that the restoration of reef-building corals has the potential to help mitigate declines in reef accretion in some locations, which could allow some key ecosystem functions to be maintained until the threat of global climate change is addressed.
珊瑚礁退化正在导致全球范围内的造礁能力以及其支持的生态、地质和社会经济功能下降。这些基本功能的持续存在将取决于珊瑚礁管理是否能够重新平衡珊瑚礁增生和侵蚀的竞争过程。在这里,我们重建了 1996 年至 2019 年佛罗里达群岛 46 个珊瑚礁的基于普查的碳酸盐预算。我们评估了改变预算状况的环境和生态驱动因素,并将历史上的珊瑚礁增生潜力趋势与珊瑚礁核心的千年尺度增生基线和基于珊瑚恢复的未来预测进行了比较。我们发现,从历史上看,大多数珊瑚礁的碳酸盐预算为正,而且许多珊瑚礁的珊瑚礁增生潜力与区域珊瑚礁建造高峰期 (7000 年前) 的3 毫米/年平均增生率相当;然而,一系列热应力事件和珊瑚疾病爆发后,造礁珊瑚 Acropora palmata 和 Orbicella spp.的减少导致该地区大多数珊瑚礁的预算从正转负。到 2019 年,只有约 15%的珊瑚礁有净碳酸盐生产。这些珊瑚礁中的大多数位于水色较低的下佛罗里达群岛近海斑块状珊瑚礁生境中,这支持了这样一种假设,即自然光照较低的环境可能为热应激提供避难所。我们警告说,我们估计的碳酸盐预算可能过于乐观;与从珊瑚礁核心测量的珊瑚礁增生潜力的比较表明,由于没有考虑非生物物理和化学侵蚀的作用,基于普查的碳酸盐预算可能低估了总侵蚀量约 1 毫米/年(-1.15 千克 CaCO3 m 年)。尽管佛罗里达州的珊瑚礁目前状况严峻,但我们证明,珊瑚礁造礁珊瑚的恢复有可能在某些地方帮助缓解珊瑚礁增生的下降,这可以使一些关键的生态系统功能在全球气候变化的威胁得到解决之前得以维持。