Suppr超能文献

心房颤动与射血分数保留心力衰竭患者心力衰竭进展风险。

Atrial fibrillation and risk of progressive heart failure in patients with preserved ejection fraction heart failure.

机构信息

Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Oct;9(5):3254-3263. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14004. Epub 2022 Jul 4.

Abstract

AIMS

Understanding of the pathophysiology of progressive heart failure (HF) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is incomplete. We sought to identify factors differentially associated with risk of progressive HF death and hospitalization in patients with HFpEF compared with patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Prospective cohort study of patients newly referred to secondary care with suspicion of HF, based on symptoms and signs of HF and elevated natriuretic peptides (NP), followed up for a minimum of 6 years. HFpEF and HFrEF were diagnosed according to the 2016 European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Of 960 patients referred, 467 had HFpEF (49%), 311 had HFrEF (32%), and 182 (19%) had neither. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was found in 37% of patients with HFpEF and 34% with HFrEF. During 6 years follow-up, 19% of HFrEF and 14% of HFpEF patients were hospitalized or died due to progressive HF, hazard ratio (HR) 0.67 (95% CI: 0.47-0.96; P = 0.028). AF was the only marker that was differentially associated with progressive HF death or hospitalization in patients with HFpEF HR 2.58 (95% CI: 1.59-4.21; P < 0.001) versus HFrEF HR 1.11 (95% CI: 0.65-1.89; P = 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

De novo patients diagnosed with HFrEF have greater risk of death or hospitalization due to progressive HF than patients with HFpEF. AF is associated with increased risk of progressive HF death or hospitalization in HFpEF but not HFrEF, raising the intriguing possibility that this may be a novel therapeutic target in this growing population.

摘要

目的

对于射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者,其心力衰竭进行性恶化的病理生理学机制尚不完全清楚。本研究旨在比较 HFpEF 患者与射血分数降低型心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者,明确与 HFpEF 患者进行性心力衰竭死亡和住院风险相关的因素。

方法和结果

本研究为前瞻性队列研究,纳入了因心力衰竭症状和体征以及利钠肽水平升高而被怀疑患有心力衰竭的二级保健机构新就诊的患者,这些患者至少随访 6 年。HFpEF 和 HFrEF 的诊断依据 2016 年欧洲心脏病学会指南。在 960 例被转诊的患者中,467 例(49%)为 HFpEF,311 例(32%)为 HFrEF,182 例(19%)两者均不是。HFpEF 患者中有 37%合并心房颤动(AF),HFrEF 患者中有 34%合并 AF。在 6 年的随访期间,19%的 HFrEF 患者和 14%的 HFpEF 患者因进行性心力衰竭而住院或死亡,风险比(HR)为 0.67(95%CI:0.47-0.96;P=0.028)。AF 是唯一与 HFpEF 患者进行性心力衰竭死亡或住院相关的标志物,HFpEF 患者的 HR 为 2.58(95%CI:1.59-4.21;P<0.001),而 HFrEF 患者的 HR 为 1.11(95%CI:0.65-1.89;P=0.7)。

结论

新诊断为 HFrEF 的患者因进行性心力衰竭而死亡或住院的风险高于 HFpEF 患者。AF 与 HFpEF 患者进行性心力衰竭死亡或住院风险增加相关,但与 HFrEF 患者无关,这提出了一个有趣的可能性,即这可能是这一不断增长的人群中的一个新的治疗靶点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/839e/9715884/e6b665cb6fb1/EHF2-9-3254-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验