• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估老年人的公平性和质量指标 - 适应和验证脆弱老年人评估护理(ACOVE)清单在葡萄牙护理环境中的应用。

Assessing equity and quality indicators for older people - Adaptation and validation of the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) checklist for the Portuguese care context.

机构信息

Escola de Economia e Gestão, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.

Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 6;22(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03104-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-022-03104-5
PMID:35790949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9256534/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Development has promoted longer and healthier lives, but the rise in the proportion of older adults poses new challenges to health systems. Susceptibilities of older persons resulting from lower knowledge about services availability, health illiteracy, lower income, higher mental decline, or physical limitations need to be identified and monitored to assure the equity and quality of health care. The aim of this study was to develop equity indicators for the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE)-3 checklist and perform the first cross-cultural adaptation and validation of this checklist into Portuguese.

METHODS

A scoping literature review of determinants or indicators of health (in)equity in the care of older people was performed. A total of 5 language experts and 18 health professionals were involved in the development and validation of the equity and quality indicators through expert opinion and focus groups. Data collected from focus groups was analyzed through directed or conventional content analysis. The usefulness of the indicators was assessed by analyzing the clinical records of 30 patients.

RESULTS

The literature review revealed that there was a worldwide gap concerning equity indicators for older people primary health care. A structured and complete checklist composed of equity and quality indicators was obtained, validated and assessed. A significant number of non-screened quality or equity related potential occurrences that could have been avoided if the proposed indicators were implemented were detected. The percentage of non-registered indicators was 76.6% for quality and 96.7% for equity.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying the proposed checklist will contribute to improve the monitoring of the clinical situation of vulnerable older people and the planning of medical and social actions directed at this group.

摘要

背景

发展延长了人们的寿命并提高了生活质量,但老年人口比例的上升给卫生系统带来了新的挑战。老年人由于对服务可用性的了解较少、健康素养较低、收入较低、精神衰退较高或身体限制等原因而变得脆弱,需要识别和监测这些脆弱性,以确保医疗保健的公平性和质量。本研究旨在为脆弱老年人评估工具(ACOVE)-3 检查表开发公平性指标,并首次对该检查表进行跨文化适应性改编和验证。

方法

对老年人护理中健康(公平)的决定因素或指标进行了广泛的文献回顾。共有 5 位语言专家和 18 位卫生专业人员通过专家意见和焦点小组参与了公平性和质量指标的制定和验证。通过定向或常规内容分析对焦点小组收集的数据进行分析。通过分析 30 名患者的临床记录来评估指标的有用性。

结果

文献综述表明,全球在老年人初级保健公平性指标方面存在差距。获得、验证和评估了一个由公平性和质量指标组成的结构化、完整的检查表。检测到大量非筛查的与质量或公平性相关的潜在问题,如果实施了拟议的指标,这些潜在问题本可以避免。质量方面未记录的指标占 76.6%,公平性方面未记录的指标占 96.7%。

结论

应用拟议的检查表将有助于改善对脆弱老年人临床状况的监测,并规划针对该群体的医疗和社会行动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9635/9258120/f0853d4e2145/12877_2022_3104_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9635/9258120/f0853d4e2145/12877_2022_3104_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9635/9258120/f0853d4e2145/12877_2022_3104_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing equity and quality indicators for older people - Adaptation and validation of the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) checklist for the Portuguese care context.评估老年人的公平性和质量指标 - 适应和验证脆弱老年人评估护理(ACOVE)清单在葡萄牙护理环境中的应用。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 6;22(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03104-5.
2
An inter-rater reliability study of the prescribing indicated medications quality indicators of the Assessing Care Of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) 3 criteria as a potentially inappropriate prescribing tool.评估脆弱老年人照护(ACOVE)3 标准下规定指示药物质量指标的评定者间信度研究:一种潜在不适当处方工具。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014 May-Jun;58(3):460-4. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
3
Implementing ACOVE Quality Indicators as an Intervention Checklist to Improve Care for Hospitalized Older Adults.将ACOVE质量指标作为干预检查表来实施,以改善对住院老年人的护理。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Jul;12(7):517-522. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2765.
4
Quality indicators for in-hospital pharmaceutical care of Dutch elderly patients: development and validation of an ACOVE-based quality indicator set.荷兰老年患者住院药学服务质量指标:基于 ACOVE 的质量指标集的制定和验证。
Drugs Aging. 2011 Apr 1;28(4):295-304. doi: 10.2165/11587700-000000000-00000.
5
Assessment of the quality of fall detection and management in primary care in the Netherlands based on the ACOVE quality indicators.基于ACOVE质量指标对荷兰初级保健中跌倒检测与管理质量的评估。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Feb;27(2):569-76. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3235-6. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
6
Introduction to the assessing care of vulnerable elders-3 quality indicator measurement set.《脆弱老年人护理评估-3质量指标测量集》简介
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Oct;55 Suppl 2:S247-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01328.x.
7
Using assessing care of vulnerable elders quality indicators to measure quality of hospital care for vulnerable elders.运用脆弱老年人护理质量评估指标来衡量医院对脆弱老年人的护理质量。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Nov;55(11):1705-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01444.x.
8
Abbreviated care-process quality indicator sets linked with survival and functional status benefit in older adults under ambulatory care.与门诊护理中老年人的生存和功能状态获益相关的简化护理流程质量指标集。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Aug;62(8):1442-50. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12943. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
9
Appropriateness of quality indicators for older patients with advanced dementia and poor prognosis.针对晚期痴呆且预后不良老年患者的质量指标的适宜性
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jul;51(7):902-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.513331.x.
10
Studies pertaining to the ACOVE quality criteria: a systematic review.关于 ACOVE 质量标准的研究:系统评价。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Feb;24(1):80-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr071. Epub 2011 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the value and impact of the adaptation process on quality indicators for local use? A scoping review.改编过程对当地使用的质量指标的价值和影响是什么? 范围综述。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 8;17(12):e0278379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278379. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Voice-Activated Virtual Home Assistant Use and Social Isolation and Loneliness Among Older Adults: Mini Review.语音激活的虚拟家庭助手的使用与老年人的社交隔离和孤独感:迷你综述。
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 11;9:742012. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.742012. eCollection 2021.
2
Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process.定向定性内容分析:对其基础方法和数据分析过程的描述与阐述。
J Res Nurs. 2018 Feb;23(1):42-55. doi: 10.1177/1744987117741667. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
3
Costs and effects of comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care for older adults with high risk for hospitalisation.
在初级保健中对有高住院风险的老年人进行综合老年评估的成本和效果。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Apr 21;21(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02166-1.
4
Inequality in healthcare use among older people in Colombia.哥伦比亚老年人医疗保健使用的不平等现象。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Oct 26;19(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01241-0.
5
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.范围综述实施的更新方法学指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
6
Equity and elderly health in India: reflections from 75th round National Sample Survey, 2017-18, amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.印度的公平与老年人健康:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对 2017-18 年第 75 轮全国抽样调查的反思。
Global Health. 2020 Oct 8;16(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00619-7.
7
Intersectional equity in health care: assessing complex inequities in primary and secondary care utilization by gender and education in northern Sweden.卫生保健中的交叉公平性:评估瑞典北部性别和教育在初级和二级保健利用方面的复杂不公平现象。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 11;19(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01272-7.
8
Health Systems, Aging, and Inequity: An Example from Chile.卫生系统、老龄化与不平等:以智利为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 9;17(18):6546. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186546.
9
Societal Views of Older Adults as Vulnerable and a Burden to Society During the COVID-19 Outbreak: Results From an Israeli Nationally Representative Sample.在 COVID-19 爆发期间,社会对老年人的看法是脆弱的,是社会的负担:来自以色列全国代表性样本的结果。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Aug 13;76(7):e313-e317. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa150.
10
Do financial barriers to access to primary health care increase the risk of poor health? Longitudinal evidence from New Zealand.经济因素是否会阻碍人们获得初级卫生保健服务,从而增加健康不良的风险?来自新西兰的纵向证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Nov;288:113255. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113255. Epub 2020 Jul 28.