• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade 试验中射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的基线临床特征。

Baseline clinical characteristics of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction enrolled in the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade trial.

机构信息

Semmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Center, Budapest, Hungary.

Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Sep;24(9):1652-1661. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2609. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1002/ejhf.2609
PMID:35791276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9796950/
Abstract

AIMS

The BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade study is the first prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial investigating the outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) upgrade in heart failure (HF) patients with intermittent or permanent right ventricular (RV) pacing with wide paced QRS. This report describes the baseline clinical characteristics of the enrolled patients and compares them to cohorts from previous milestone CRT studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This international multicentre randomized controlled trial investigates 360 patients having a pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) device for at least 6 months prior to enrolment, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤35%), HF symptoms (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class II-IVa), wide paced QRS (>150 ms), and ≥20% of RV pacing burden without having a native left bundle branch block. At enrolment, the mean age of the patients was 73 ± 8 years; 89% were male, 97% were in NYHA class II/III functional class, and 56% had atrial fibrillation. Enrolled patients predominantly had conventional PM devices, with a mean RV pacing burden of 86%. Thus, this is a patient cohort with advanced HF, low baseline LVEF (25 ± 7%), high N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (2231 pg/ml [25th-75th percentile 1254-4309 pg/ml]), and frequent HF hospitalizations during the preceding 12 months (50%).

CONCLUSION

When compared with prior CRT trial cohorts, the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade study includes older patients with a strong male predominance and a high burden of atrial fibrillation and other comorbidities. Moreover, this cohort represents an advanced HF population with low LVEF, high NT-proBNP, and frequent previous HF events.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02270840.

摘要

目的

BUDAPEST-CRT 升级研究是首个前瞻性、随机、多中心临床试验,旨在研究伴有间歇性或永久性右心室(RV)起搏且 QRS 波宽大(>150ms)的心力衰竭(HF)患者行心脏再同步治疗(CRT)升级后的结局。该研究报告描述了纳入患者的基线临床特征,并与之前里程碑式 CRT 研究的队列进行了比较。

方法和结果

这项国际多中心随机对照试验纳入了 360 例至少在入组前 6 个月内植入起搏器(PM)或植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)的患者,这些患者左心室射血分数(LVEF≤35%)降低,HF 症状(纽约心脏协会[NYHA]功能分级 II-IVa),QRS 波宽大(>150ms),RV 起搏比例≥20%,但无固有左束支传导阻滞。入组时,患者的平均年龄为 73±8 岁;89%为男性,97%为 NYHA 功能分级 II/III 级,56%有房颤。纳入的患者主要为传统 PM 设备,RV 起搏比例平均为 86%。因此,这是一个 HF 进展期、基线 LVEF 较低(25±7%)、N 末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平较高(2231pg/ml[25th-75th 百分位数 1254-4309pg/ml]),且在过去 12 个月内 HF 住院频繁(50%)的患者队列。

结论

与之前的 CRT 试验队列相比,BUDAPEST-CRT 升级研究纳入了年龄较大的患者,男性居多,房颤及其他合并症负担较重。此外,该队列代表了一个 HF 进展期、LVEF 较低、NT-proBNP 较高且 HF 事件频发的患者群体。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02270840。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b63b/9796950/e46409d20689/EJHF-24-1652-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b63b/9796950/60b1fd8c9f36/EJHF-24-1652-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b63b/9796950/b8c1084bbed4/EJHF-24-1652-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b63b/9796950/e46409d20689/EJHF-24-1652-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b63b/9796950/60b1fd8c9f36/EJHF-24-1652-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b63b/9796950/b8c1084bbed4/EJHF-24-1652-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b63b/9796950/e46409d20689/EJHF-24-1652-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Baseline clinical characteristics of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction enrolled in the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade trial.BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade 试验中射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的基线临床特征。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Sep;24(9):1652-1661. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2609. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
2
Rationale and design of the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade Study: a prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial.《布达佩斯-CRT 升级研究的原理和设计:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心临床试验》
Europace. 2017 Sep 1;19(9):1549-1555. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw193.
3
Benefits of upgrading right ventricular to biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation.心房颤动心力衰竭患者升级右心室为双心室起搏的益处。
Europace. 2024 Jul 2;26(7). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae179.
4
Upgrade of right ventricular pacing to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: a randomized trial.右心室起搏升级为心力衰竭心脏再同步治疗:一项随机试验。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 21;44(40):4259-4269. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad591.
5
Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.随机试验:左束支起搏与双心室起搏治疗心脏再同步治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Sep 27;80(13):1205-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.07.019.
6
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and moderately reduced ejection fraction: Could it trigger a super-response?射血分数中度降低的心力衰竭患者的心脏再同步治疗:它会引发超级反应吗?
Indian Heart J. 2019 May-Jun;71(3):229-234. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 May 3.
7
Biventricular pacing (cardiac resynchronization therapy): an evidence-based analysis.双心室起搏(心脏再同步治疗):基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(13):1-60. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
8
Right ventricular lead positioning does not influence the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation.右心室导联位置并不影响心力衰竭伴心房颤动患者心脏再同步治疗的获益。
Europace. 2011 Dec;13(12):1747-52. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur193. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
9
MAgnetic resonance imaging based DUal lead cardiac Resynchronization therapy: A prospectIve Left Bundle Branch Pacing study (MADURAI LBBP study).基于磁共振成像的双导心脏再同步治疗:前瞻性左束支起搏研究(MADURAI LBBP 研究)。
Heart Rhythm. 2023 Aug;20(8):1119-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.05.019. Epub 2023 May 20.
10
The benefit of upgrading chronically right ventricle-paced heart failure patients to resynchronization therapy demonstrated by strain rate imaging.应变率成像显示将慢性右心室起搏心力衰竭患者升级为再同步治疗的益处。
Heart Rhythm. 2006 Apr;3(4):435-42. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.12.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Left ventricular ejection fraction is a determinant of cardiac performance after long-term conduction system pacing in patients with left bundle branch block?左束支传导阻滞患者长期传导系统起搏后,左心室射血分数是心脏功能的决定因素吗?
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04660-5.
2
The Exosomes Derived From Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Alleviate Inflammatory Injury in Heart Failure Disease by Enhancing the Expression of KLF4.源自骨髓间充质干细胞的外泌体通过增强KLF4的表达减轻心力衰竭疾病中的炎症损伤。
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2025 Mar;13(3):e70161. doi: 10.1002/iid3.70161.
3
Benefits of upgrading right ventricular to biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation.

本文引用的文献

1
The '10 commandments' for the 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.2021年欧洲心脏病学会心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗指南的“十诫”
Eur Heart J. 2021 Nov 7;42(42):4295. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab699.
2
Prevalence and risk factors of atrioventricular block among 15 million Chinese health examination participants in 2018: a nation-wide cross-sectional study.2018 年 1500 万中国体检参与者中心房-心室传导阻滞的患病率及危险因素:一项全国性横断面研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Jun 11;21(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02105-3.
3
Optimized implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care: A joint position statement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the European Society of Cardiology.
心房颤动心力衰竭患者升级右心室为双心室起搏的益处。
Europace. 2024 Jul 2;26(7). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae179.
4
2024 update in heart failure.2024年心力衰竭治疗进展
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Feb;12(1):8-42. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14857. Epub 2024 May 28.
5
Upgrade of right ventricular pacing to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: a randomized trial.右心室起搏升级为心力衰竭心脏再同步治疗:一项随机试验。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 21;44(40):4259-4269. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad591.
6
Special Issue: Latest Advances in Delivery and Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Conduction System Pacing.特刊:心脏再同步治疗与传导系统起搏的递送及结果的最新进展
J Clin Med. 2023 May 14;12(10):3453. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103453.
7
Upgrading right ventricular pacemakers to biventricular pacing or conduction system pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.升级右心室起搏器为双心室起搏或传导系统起搏:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Europace. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):1077-1086. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac188.
心脏再同步治疗的优化实施:呼吁采取行动以转诊和优化治疗:心力衰竭协会(HFA)、欧洲心律协会(EHRA)和欧洲心脏病学会的心血管影像协会(EACVI)的联合立场声明。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Dec;22(12):2349-2369. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2046.
4
Atrial Fibrillation in Older People: Concepts and Controversies.老年人的心房颤动:概念与争议
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Aug 8;6:175. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00175. eCollection 2019.
5
2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society.2018年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心律学会关于心动过缓和心脏传导延迟患者评估与管理的指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组及心律学会的报告
Circulation. 2019 Aug 20;140(8):e333-e381. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000627. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
6
Upgrades from a previous device compared to de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy in the European Society of Cardiology CRT Survey II.与欧洲心脏病学会 CRT 调查 II 中的从头开始心脏再同步治疗相比,来自先前设备的升级。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Oct;20(10):1457-1468. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1235. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
7
CRT Survey II: a European Society of Cardiology survey of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in 11 088 patients-who is doing what to whom and how?CRT 调查 II:欧洲心脏病学会对 11088 例心脏再同步治疗患者的调查——谁对谁做了什么以及怎么做的?
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Jun;20(6):1039-1051. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1142. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
8
De novo implantation vs. upgrade cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全新植入与升级心脏再同步治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart Fail Rev. 2018 Jan;23(1):15-26. doi: 10.1007/s10741-017-9652-1.
9
Association between implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy and different lead positions in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗患者中植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗与不同导线位置的关系。
Europace. 2018 Sep 1;20(9):e133-e139. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux296.
10
2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America.2017年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国心力衰竭学会对2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会心力衰竭管理指南的重点更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南特别工作组及美国心力衰竭学会的报告
Circulation. 2017 Aug 8;136(6):e137-e161. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000509. Epub 2017 Apr 28.