• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

表型差异指数:在量化表型变异时纠正个体内和个体间的可变性。

Phenotypic dissimilarity index: Correcting for intra- and interindividual variability when quantifying phenotypic variation.

机构信息

Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia.

Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.

出版信息

Ecology. 2022 Nov;103(11):e3806. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3806. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1002/ecy.3806
PMID:35791858
Abstract

In trait-based ecology, phenotypic variation (PVar) is often quantified with measures expressing average differences between populations standardized in the range 0-1. However, these measures disregard the within-population trait variability. In addition, some of them cannot be partitioned between populations. These aspects can either alter their interpretation or limit their applicability. To overcome these problems, we propose a new measure, the phenotypic dissimilarity (PhD) index, to quantify PVar between populations in scenarios of varying within-population interindividual trait variability. PhD can also quantify within-population PVar while accounting for intraindividual trait variability. Using simulated and real data, we show that using the PhD index becomes important when the within-population trait variability is not negligible, as in all ecological studies. By accounting for within-population trait variability, the PhD index does not overestimate PVar across an environmental gradient compared to other estimators. Traits inherently vary within species. Accounting for such variability is essential to understanding species' phenotypic responses to environmental cues. The proposed PhD index will provide ecologists with a tool for quantifying PVar within species and compare it between species at different levels of biological organization. We provide an R function to calculate the PhD index.

摘要

在基于特征的生态学中,表型变异(PVar)通常使用表达种群之间平均差异的度量来量化,这些度量在 0-1 的范围内标准化。然而,这些度量忽略了种群内的性状变异性。此外,其中一些度量不能在种群之间进行划分。这些方面可能会改变它们的解释或限制它们的适用性。为了克服这些问题,我们提出了一种新的度量,即表型差异(PhD)指数,用于量化在种群内个体间性状变异性不同的情况下种群之间的 PVar。PhD 指数还可以在考虑个体内性状变异性的情况下量化种群内的 PVar。使用模拟和真实数据,我们表明,当种群内的性状变异性不可忽略时,如在所有生态学研究中,使用 PhD 指数变得很重要。通过考虑种群内的性状变异性,与其他估计量相比,PhD 指数不会在环境梯度上高估 PVar。性状在物种内固有地变化。考虑到这种变异性对于理解物种对环境线索的表型反应至关重要。所提出的 PhD 指数将为生态学家提供一种量化物种内 PVar 的工具,并在不同层次的生物组织之间比较物种之间的 PVar。我们提供了一个用于计算 PhD 指数的 R 函数。

相似文献

1
Phenotypic dissimilarity index: Correcting for intra- and interindividual variability when quantifying phenotypic variation.表型差异指数:在量化表型变异时纠正个体内和个体间的可变性。
Ecology. 2022 Nov;103(11):e3806. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3806. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
2
Phenotypic plasticity can reverse the relative extent of intra- and interspecific variability across a thermal gradient.表型可塑性可以逆转在热梯度上种内和种间变异性的相对程度。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jun 30;288(1953):20210428. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0428.
3
Diversity of parental environments increases phenotypic variation in Arabidopsis populations more than genetic diversity but similarly affects productivity.亲本环境的多样性比遗传多样性更能增加拟南芥群体的表型变异,但同样会影响生产力。
Ann Bot. 2021 Mar 24;127(4):425-436. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa100.
4
Large-scale spatial variability in urban tolerance of birds.鸟类城市耐受性的大规模空间变异性。
J Anim Ecol. 2023 Feb;92(2):403-416. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13862. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
5
Intraspecific variability drives functional changes in lichen epiphytic communities across Europe.种内变异性驱动欧洲地衣附生群落的功能变化。
Ecology. 2020 Jun;101(6):e03017. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3017. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
6
The functional syndrome: linking individual trait variability to ecosystem functioning.功能综合征:将个体特质变异性与生态系统功能联系起来。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 6;284(1868). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1893.
7
The role of timing in intraspecific trait ecology.种内特征生态学中的时间因素作用。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2022 Nov;37(11):997-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
8
Trait dimensionality and population choice alter estimates of phenotypic dissimilarity.性状维度和群体选择会改变表型差异的估计值。
Ecol Evol. 2017 Mar 8;7(7):2273-2285. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2780. eCollection 2017 Apr.
9
Low levels of intraspecific trait variation in a keystone invertebrate group.一个关键无脊椎动物类群的种内性状变异水平较低。
Oecologia. 2019 Aug;190(4):725-735. doi: 10.1007/s00442-019-04426-9. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
10
The ecology of differences: assessing community assembly with trait and evolutionary distances.差异的生态学:用特征和进化距离评估群落组装。
Ecol Lett. 2013 Oct;16(10):1234-44. doi: 10.1111/ele.12161. Epub 2013 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Contrasting Roles of Intraspecific Trait Variability and Species Turnover in Shaping Functional Composition During Vegetation Restoration on the Loess Plateau.黄土高原植被恢复过程中种内性状变异和物种更替在塑造功能组成方面的对比作用
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jul 13;15(7):e71808. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71808. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Geographical variation in functional traits of leaves of Caryopteris mongholica and the role of climate.金叶风箱果叶片功能性状的地理变异及其与气候的关系。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Aug 15;23(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04410-9.