Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Turning Point, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Addiction. 2022 Nov;117(11):2837-2846. doi: 10.1111/add.15989. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
Approach bias modification (ApBM) targeting alcohol approach bias has been previously shown to reduce likelihood of relapse during the first 2 weeks following inpatient withdrawal treatment (IWT). We tested whether ApBM's effects endure for a longer period by analysing alcohol use outcomes 3, 6 and 12 months post-discharge.
A double-blind, sham-controlled randomized controlled trial.
Four IWT units in Melbourne, Australia.
Three hundred alcohol IWT patients (173 men, 126 women, 1 non-binary; mean age 43.5 years) were recruited between 4 June 2017 and 14 July 2019. Follow-up data collection was completed on 22 September 2020.
Four ApBM sessions were delivered during IWT. ApBM trained participants (n = 147) to avoid alcohol and approach non-alcohol beverage cues. Controls (n = 153) responded to the same stimuli, but without approach/avoidance training.
Date of first lapse was recorded for non-abstinent participants to determine time to first lapse. Time-line follow-back interviews assessed past-month alcohol consumption at each follow-up, with participants reporting no alcohol consumption classified as abstinent. In analyses of past-month abstinence, non-abstinence was assumed in participants lost to follow-up. Number of past-month drinking days, standard drinks and heavy drinking days (five or more standard drinks for women or non-binary; six or more standard drinks for men) were calculated for non-abstinent participants at each follow-up.
ApBM significantly delayed time to first lapse [ApBM median: 53 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 21-61; controls = 12 days, 95% CI = 9-21, P = 0.045]. Past-month abstinence rates at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups were 33/153 (21.6%), 30/153 (19.6%), and 24/153 (15.7%) in controls; and 51/147 (34.7%), 30/147 (20.4%) and 29/147 (19.7%) in the ApBM group, respectively. Past-month abstinence was significantly more likely in ApBM participants than controls at the 3-month follow-up [odds ratio (OR) = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.16-3.23, P = 0.012], but not at 6- or 12-month follow-ups (6-month OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.60-1.95, P = 0.862; 12-month OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.73-2.40, P = 0.360). No significant group differences were found for indices of alcohol consumption in non-abstinent participants.
Approach bias modification for alcohol delivered during inpatient withdrawal treatment helps to prevent relapse, increasing rates of abstinence from alcohol for at least 3 months post-discharge.
先前的研究表明,针对酒精趋近偏差的趋近偏差修正(ApBM)可以降低住院戒断治疗(IWT)后前 2 周内复发的可能性。我们通过分析出院后 3、6 和 12 个月的酒精使用结果,来检验 ApBM 的效果是否可以持续更长时间。
双盲、假对照随机对照试验。
澳大利亚墨尔本的 4 个 IWT 单位。
2017 年 6 月 4 日至 2019 年 7 月 14 日期间,招募了 300 名酒精 IWT 患者(173 名男性,126 名女性,1 名非二元性别;平均年龄 43.5 岁)。2020 年 9 月 22 日完成了随访数据收集。
在 IWT 期间进行了 4 次 ApBM 疗程。接受 ApBM 的参与者(n=147)被训练避免接触酒精和接近非酒精饮料线索。对照组(n=153)对相同的刺激做出反应,但没有接受趋近/回避训练。
对于未戒酒的参与者,记录首次复发的日期,以确定首次复发的时间。时间线回溯访谈在每次随访时评估过去一个月的饮酒情况,将报告无饮酒的参与者归类为戒酒。在分析过去一个月的戒酒情况时,对于失去随访的参与者,假设他们没有戒酒。在每次随访时,对于未戒酒的参与者,计算过去一个月的饮酒天数、标准饮料和重度饮酒天数(女性或非二元性别为 5 个或以上标准饮料;男性为 6 个或以上标准饮料)。
ApBM 显著延迟了首次复发的时间[ApBM 中位数:53 天,95%置信区间(CI)=21-61;对照组:12 天,95% CI=9-21,P=0.045]。在 3、6 和 12 个月的随访中,对照组的过去一个月戒酒率分别为 33/153(21.6%)、30/153(19.6%)和 24/153(15.7%);ApBM 组分别为 51/147(34.7%)、30/147(20.4%)和 29/147(19.7%)。在 3 个月的随访中,ApBM 组参与者的过去一个月戒酒率明显高于对照组[优势比(OR)=1.93,95%CI=1.16-3.23,P=0.012],但在 6 个月和 12 个月的随访中没有差异(6 个月 OR=1.05,95%CI=0.60-1.95,P=0.862;12 个月 OR=1.32,95%CI=0.73-2.40,P=0.360)。在非戒酒参与者中,未发现饮酒指标的组间显著差异。
在住院戒断治疗期间实施的酒精趋近偏差修正有助于预防复发,增加出院后至少 3 个月的戒酒率。