Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Jan;6(1):e1674. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1674. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with high-dose (HD) cisplatin is the standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). Due to the higher treatment-related adverse effects with standard therapy, alternative regimens (non-standard therapy), namely, lower dose weekly cisplatin, carboplatin/paclitaxel, or cetuximab are considered. There is, however, no consensus on non-standard regimens. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of these regimens.
This single centre retrospective cohort study included all consecutive adult patients with newly diagnosed LA-HNSCC treated with either standard or non-standard regimens between January 2016 and April 2021. The primary outcome was 2-year failure-free survival (FFS). The secondary outcomes included acute toxicities, hospitalisation rates, dose modifications, treatment failure rates (TFR), and overall survival.
About 235 patients were included in the final analysis; median age was 61 years (IQR 55-67), and 87% were male. Most had oropharyngeal tumours (85.5%) and p16-positivity was frequent (80%). About 56% received non-standard regimens: weekly cisplatin = 79 and non-cisplatin = 48. These patients had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; p < .001) and lower European Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)-0 (p = .003). There was no difference in 2-year FFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.16; 95% confidence interval - [CI] 0.65-2.05), hospitalisation and grade-3 toxicity rates between the two regimens. Nausea and vomiting were lower in the non-standard regimen (3.0% vs. 16%, p < .001). Dose reductions, adjusted for age, sex, and CCI, were less likely in the non-standard regimen (OR = 2.36; 95%-CI: 1.01-5.49, p = .007).
We demonstrated similar efficacy of lower dose weekly cisplatin and carboplatin/paclitaxel regimens and better safety profile of weekly cisplatin compared to standard HD cisplatin regimens for LA-HNSCC. Multicenter randomised control trials are required in HD cisplatin-ineligible patients.
大剂量(HD)顺铂同步放化疗是局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LA-HNSCC)的标准治疗方法。由于标准治疗相关的不良反应较高,因此考虑使用替代方案(非标准治疗),即低剂量每周顺铂、卡铂/紫杉醇或西妥昔单抗。然而,对于非标准治疗方案尚无共识。我们旨在研究这些方案的疗效和安全性。
本单中心回顾性队列研究纳入了 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 4 月期间接受标准或非标准治疗方案治疗的所有新诊断为 LA-HNSCC 的成年患者。主要结局是 2 年无失败生存率(FFS)。次要结局包括急性毒性、住院率、剂量调整、治疗失败率(TFR)和总生存率。
约 235 例患者纳入最终分析;中位年龄为 61 岁(IQR 55-67),87%为男性。大多数患者为口咽肿瘤(85.5%),p16 阳性率较高(80%)。约 56%的患者接受了非标准治疗方案:每周顺铂=79 例,非顺铂=48 例。这些患者的Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)更高(p<0.001),ECOG-0 评分更低(p=0.003)。两种方案的 2 年 FFS 无差异(风险比[HR]1.16;95%置信区间[CI]0.65-2.05),住院率和 3 级毒性发生率也无差异。非标准方案的恶心和呕吐发生率较低(3.0% vs. 16%,p<0.001)。对于年龄、性别和 CCI 进行校正的剂量减少,非标准方案的可能性更小(OR=2.36;95%CI:1.01-5.49,p=0.007)。
我们证明了低剂量每周顺铂和卡铂/紫杉醇方案与标准 HD 顺铂方案相比,在 LA-HNSCC 中的疗效相似,且每周顺铂方案的安全性更好。对于 HD 顺铂不适用的患者,需要进行多中心随机对照试验。