Suppr超能文献

局部晚期头颈部癌症的标准(高剂量)顺铂和非标准化疗的治疗结果。

Treatment outcomes of standard (high dose) cisplatin and non-standard chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Jan;6(1):e1674. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1674. Epub 2022 Jul 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with high-dose (HD) cisplatin is the standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). Due to the higher treatment-related adverse effects with standard therapy, alternative regimens (non-standard therapy), namely, lower dose weekly cisplatin, carboplatin/paclitaxel, or cetuximab are considered. There is, however, no consensus on non-standard regimens. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of these regimens.

METHODS

This single centre retrospective cohort study included all consecutive adult patients with newly diagnosed LA-HNSCC treated with either standard or non-standard regimens between January 2016 and April 2021. The primary outcome was 2-year failure-free survival (FFS). The secondary outcomes included acute toxicities, hospitalisation rates, dose modifications, treatment failure rates (TFR), and overall survival.

RESULTS

About 235 patients were included in the final analysis; median age was 61 years (IQR 55-67), and 87% were male. Most had oropharyngeal tumours (85.5%) and p16-positivity was frequent (80%). About 56% received non-standard regimens: weekly cisplatin = 79 and non-cisplatin = 48. These patients had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; p < .001) and lower European Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)-0 (p = .003). There was no difference in 2-year FFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.16; 95% confidence interval - [CI] 0.65-2.05), hospitalisation and grade-3 toxicity rates between the two regimens. Nausea and vomiting were lower in the non-standard regimen (3.0% vs. 16%, p < .001). Dose reductions, adjusted for age, sex, and CCI, were less likely in the non-standard regimen (OR = 2.36; 95%-CI: 1.01-5.49, p = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated similar efficacy of lower dose weekly cisplatin and carboplatin/paclitaxel regimens and better safety profile of weekly cisplatin compared to standard HD cisplatin regimens for LA-HNSCC. Multicenter randomised control trials are required in HD cisplatin-ineligible patients.

摘要

简介

大剂量(HD)顺铂同步放化疗是局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LA-HNSCC)的标准治疗方法。由于标准治疗相关的不良反应较高,因此考虑使用替代方案(非标准治疗),即低剂量每周顺铂、卡铂/紫杉醇或西妥昔单抗。然而,对于非标准治疗方案尚无共识。我们旨在研究这些方案的疗效和安全性。

方法

本单中心回顾性队列研究纳入了 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 4 月期间接受标准或非标准治疗方案治疗的所有新诊断为 LA-HNSCC 的成年患者。主要结局是 2 年无失败生存率(FFS)。次要结局包括急性毒性、住院率、剂量调整、治疗失败率(TFR)和总生存率。

结果

约 235 例患者纳入最终分析;中位年龄为 61 岁(IQR 55-67),87%为男性。大多数患者为口咽肿瘤(85.5%),p16 阳性率较高(80%)。约 56%的患者接受了非标准治疗方案:每周顺铂=79 例,非顺铂=48 例。这些患者的Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)更高(p<0.001),ECOG-0 评分更低(p=0.003)。两种方案的 2 年 FFS 无差异(风险比[HR]1.16;95%置信区间[CI]0.65-2.05),住院率和 3 级毒性发生率也无差异。非标准方案的恶心和呕吐发生率较低(3.0% vs. 16%,p<0.001)。对于年龄、性别和 CCI 进行校正的剂量减少,非标准方案的可能性更小(OR=2.36;95%CI:1.01-5.49,p=0.007)。

结论

我们证明了低剂量每周顺铂和卡铂/紫杉醇方案与标准 HD 顺铂方案相比,在 LA-HNSCC 中的疗效相似,且每周顺铂方案的安全性更好。对于 HD 顺铂不适用的患者,需要进行多中心随机对照试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d2/9875652/b2759e6f0b00/CNR2-6-e1674-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验