Suppr超能文献

犬 C 反应蛋白的 Randox 和 Fuji Dri-Chem vcCRP-P 检测评估。

Evaluation of the Randox and Fuji Dri-Chem vcCRP-P assays of canine C-reactive protein.

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Vet Diagn Invest. 2022 Sep;34(5):842-847. doi: 10.1177/10406387221108450. Epub 2022 Jul 6.

Abstract

In veterinary medicine, measurement of canine C-reactive protein (cCRP) is used widely to detect inflammatory diseases. We evaluated the precision of Randox and Fuji assays for cCRP, as well as accuracy, correlation, and agreement compared to a reference ELISA. Blood samples from 71 client-owned dogs (20 healthy, 51 diseased) were analyzed with the 3 assays. Inter-assay CVs were ~3.5% with both the Randox and Fuji assays. The mean biases were -1.90% for the Randox and -5.93% for the Fuji test; the targeted biases were ~8.5% for both assays. The CV, bias, and observed total error were acceptable for the 2 assays compared to ASVCP recommendations based on biological variation studies. The Spearman correlation coefficient for cCRP concentration compared with the reference ELISA was 0.83 for the Randox test and 0.92 for the Fuji test. Both assays measured cCRP precisely at intermediate and increased concentrations. Correlation with the reference ELISA was good, and both assays could be used to evaluate cCRP concentrations in veterinary practice. However, the assays did not reach analytical agreement; hence the results obtained by these assays are not interchangeable, and serial monitoring of cCRP requires the use of the same assay.

摘要

在兽医领域,犬 C 反应蛋白(cCRP)的测量被广泛用于诊断炎症性疾病。我们评估了 Randox 和 Fuji 两种 cCRP 检测方法的精密度,以及与参考 ELISA 相比的准确度、相关性和一致性。用这 3 种方法分析了 71 只患宠(20 只健康,51 只患病)的血液样本。Randox 和 Fuji 两种检测方法的批内 CV 均约为 3.5%。Randox 检测的平均偏倚为-1.90%,Fuji 检测的平均偏倚为-5.93%;两种检测方法的目标偏倚均约为 8.5%。与基于生物学变异研究的 ASVCP 建议相比,这两种检测方法的 CV、偏倚和总观测误差均在可接受范围内。与参考 ELISA 相比,Randox 检测和 Fuji 检测的 cCRP 浓度的 Spearman 相关系数分别为 0.83 和 0.92。两种检测方法在中间和较高浓度时都能精确测量 cCRP。与参考 ELISA 的相关性良好,两种检测方法都可用于兽医临床实践中评估 cCRP 浓度。但是,这两种检测方法没有达到分析一致性;因此,这些检测方法的结果不能互换,而 cCRP 的连续监测需要使用相同的检测方法。

相似文献

7
Evaluation of a point-of-care test for canine C-reactive protein.犬C反应蛋白即时检验的评估
Vet Clin Pathol. 2011 Sep;40(3):384-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2011.00339.x. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
10
Development of canine C-reactive protein assays.犬 C 反应蛋白检测方法的建立。
Acta Vet Scand. 2020 Sep 7;62(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13028-020-00549-9.

本文引用的文献

7
Evaluation of a point-of-care test for canine C-reactive protein.犬C反应蛋白即时检验的评估
Vet Clin Pathol. 2011 Sep;40(3):384-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2011.00339.x. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
8
Comments on measurement of C-reactive protein in dogs.关于犬类C反应蛋白测量的评论
Vet Clin Pathol. 2010 Dec;39(4):402-3; author reply 404. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2010.00276.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验