Clinical Trials Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2022 Oct;11(10):1177-1183. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.1134. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
In this bioequivalence study, we aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence of test (T) and reference (R) afatinib dimaleate tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasted conditions. This was a randomized, open-label, 2-period, single-dose, crossover study. A total of 60 healthy subjects were included in the study according to the screening criteria, and the subjects were randomly divided into the T/R and R/T groups. All subjects were administrated a single 40-mg oral dose of the test or reference formulation, separated by a 14-day washout period in the crossover manner. The pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum concentration (C ), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last measurable concentration and AUC from time 0 to infinity were assessed for bioequivalence. The plasma concentrations of afatinib dimaleate were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. In addition, adverse events were monitored and recorded on the basis of patient interviews and physical examinations to assess the safety of the 2 formulations. There were 4 subjects who withdrew before the dosing of period 2. The 90%CIs of geometric mean ratios of C , AUC from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity were 95.9% to 104.1%, 98.8 % to 104.1%, and 98.9% to 104.0%, respectively, all of which were within the bioequivalence range of 80.0% to 125.0%. This randomized study demonstrated that the test formulation of afatinib was bioequivalent to the reference formulation in healthy Chinese subjects under fasted conditions. Both formulations were well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were observed during the study.
在这项生物等效性研究中,我们旨在评估空腹条件下健康中国受试者中测试(T)和参比(R)阿法替尼马来酸盐片剂的生物等效性。这是一项随机、开放标签、2 期、单剂量、交叉研究。根据筛选标准,共有 60 名健康受试者纳入研究,受试者随机分为 T/R 和 R/T 组。所有受试者均以交叉方式接受单次 40mg 口服剂量的测试或参比制剂。评估了包括最大浓度(C )、从 0 时间到最后可测量浓度的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)和从 0 时间到无穷大的 AUC 在内的药代动力学参数的生物等效性。采用液相色谱-串联质谱法分析阿法替尼马来酸盐的血浆浓度。此外,根据患者访谈和体格检查监测并记录不良事件,以评估两种制剂的安全性。有 4 名受试者在第 2 期给药前退出。C 、从 0 时间到最后可测量浓度的 AUC 和从 0 时间到无穷大的 AUC 的几何均数比值的 90%置信区间分别为 95.9%至 104.1%、98.8%至 104.1%和 98.9%至 104.0%,均在 80.0%至 125.0%的生物等效范围内。这项随机研究表明,阿法替尼的测试制剂在空腹条件下与健康中国受试者的参比制剂生物等效。两种制剂均耐受良好,研究过程中未观察到严重不良事件。