Suppr超能文献

作为移植桥梁的移植式与经皮腋动脉主动脉内球囊泵支持的临床结局:倾向评分匹配分析

Clinical outcomes of grafted vs. percutaneous axillary intra-aortic balloon pump support as a bridge to transplantation: a propensity score-matched analysis.

作者信息

Nishida Hidefumi, Kalantari Sara, Nguyen Ann, Chung Bow, Grinstein Jonathan, Kim Gene, Sarswat Nitasha, Smith Bryan, Pinney Sean, Onsager David, Song Tae, Salerno Christopher, Jeevanandam Valluvan, Ota Takeyoshi

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Section of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Chicago, 5841S Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, MC504060637, USA.

Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2022 Dec;37(12):1995-2001. doi: 10.1007/s00380-022-02122-y. Epub 2022 Jul 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to investigate the early and late outcomes of axillary intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) implantation as a bridge to heart transplantation, comparing the grafted technique with the percutaneous technique.

METHODS

Between July 2009 and January 2020, 163 patients underwent an axillary IABP insertion as a bridge to heart transplantation. Among them, 97 patients underwent axillary IABP implantation through a graft sutured onto the axillary artery (Group A) and 66 patients underwent percutaneously (Group B). Propensity matching identified 53 matched pairs for analysis (C-statistics 0.741). The primary outcomes of interest included IABP-related complications, success rate of a bridge to transplantation, in-hospital mortality, and late survival.

RESULTS

In the propensity-score matched cohort, there were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The operation time was significantly longer in Group A than in Group B (141.5 ± 38.3 min vs 42.7 ± 19.3 min, p < 0.01). The complication rates including stroke, re-exploration for bleeding, and aortic event were not significantly different between Group A and B. However, Group A required more transfusion and re-exploration for bleeding. The success rate of a bridge to transplantation was similar between Group A (47/53, 88.7%) and Group B (47/53, 88.7%). There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality and late survival between two groups.

CONCLUSION

In the propensity score matching analysis, there were not any significant differences between the two groups in IABP-related complications, in-hospital mortality, and late survival. The percutaneous technique provided a shorter operation time and less requirement of transfusion and re-exploration for bleeding compared to the grafted technique. The percutaneous technique might be favorable when feasible.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨腋动脉主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)植入作为心脏移植桥梁的早期和晚期结果,比较移植技术与经皮技术。

方法

2009年7月至2020年1月期间,163例患者接受腋动脉IABP植入作为心脏移植的桥梁。其中,97例患者通过将移植物缝合到腋动脉上进行腋动脉IABP植入(A组),66例患者经皮进行(B组)。倾向匹配确定了53对匹配对进行分析(C统计量为0.741)。感兴趣的主要结局包括IABP相关并发症、移植桥梁成功率、住院死亡率和晚期生存率。

结果

在倾向评分匹配队列中,两组基线特征无显著差异。A组手术时间明显长于B组(141.5±38.3分钟对42.7±19.3分钟,p<0.01)。A组和B组包括中风、再次手术止血和主动脉事件在内的并发症发生率无显著差异。然而,A组需要更多的输血和再次手术止血。A组(47/53,88.7%)和B组(47/53,88.7%)的移植桥梁成功率相似。两组住院死亡率和晚期生存率无显著差异。

结论

在倾向评分匹配分析中,两组在IABP相关并发症、住院死亡率和晚期生存率方面无显著差异。与移植技术相比,经皮技术手术时间更短,输血和再次手术止血的需求更少。可行时,经皮技术可能更有利。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验