Greely Henry T
Stanford Law School, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
J Law Biosci. 2022 Jul 3;9(2):lsac019. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsac019. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
This article examines the possible effects of the end of a federal constitutional right to abortion on clinical practice and research involving human embryos. It first analyzes the likely outcomes of , concluding the Supreme Court will either overrule the federal constitutional abortion right or restrict it in a way that leads to its rapid disappearance. Next, the article discusses a possible increase in use of preimplantation genetic testing as one result. It then forecasts the likely ramifications of such a court decision on state legislation affecting ex vivo human embryos in two ways. It examines the possibility that victory over will inspire embryo support groups to push for limitations on fertilization, perhaps on its destruction of embryos and more likely on permissible grounds for prospective parents to use in choosing embryos for transfer. It ends by discussing the prospects of new laws in some states banning or limiting research with human embryos.
本文探讨联邦宪法赋予的堕胎权终结对涉及人类胚胎的临床实践和研究可能产生的影响。文章首先分析了相关可能结果,得出最高法院要么推翻联邦宪法赋予的堕胎权,要么以导致该权利迅速消失的方式对其加以限制的结论。接下来,文章讨论了作为一种结果,胚胎植入前基因检测的使用可能增加的情况。然后,文章从两个方面预测了这样一项法院裁决对影响体外人类胚胎的州立法可能产生的影响。文章探讨了战胜[相关内容未明确]可能会激励胚胎支持团体推动对体外受精加以限制的可能性,或许是限制对胚胎的破坏,更有可能是限制准父母选择胚胎进行移植时可允许的理由。文章最后讨论了一些州出台禁止或限制人类胚胎研究新法律的前景。