• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜辅助胸腔镜食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的临床疗效及术后疼痛情况

Clinical Effect and Postoperative Pain of Laparo-Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

作者信息

Yu Yue, Han Yun

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jun 26;2022:4507696. doi: 10.1155/2022/4507696. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/4507696
PMID:35795286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9251098/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical effect and postoperative pain of laparo-thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 90 patients with esophageal cancer who were admitted and treated in our hospital from August 2020 to November 2021 were randomly selected as the research subjects for prospective analysis, and the patients were assigned to the control group and the experimental group according to the time of admission equally, with 45 cases in each group. Patients in the control group underwent conventional open surgery, and those in the experimental group underwent laparo-thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Then, operation-related indicators, postoperative pain, inflammatory factors, and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and postoperative length of stays of the experimental group were significantly shorter or less than those of the control group ( < 0.05); there was no significant difference in the number of lymph nodes dissected between the two groups ( > 0.05). The number of patients with moderate and severe pain in the experimental group was significantly smaller than that in the control group, and the number of patients with mild pain was significantly larger than that in the control group ( < 0.05). The level of inflammatory factors (TNF-, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10) was significantly lower than that in the control group ( < 0.05); the incidence of surgical complications in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Laparo-thoracoscopic esophagectomy can significantly improve the clinical effect in patients with esophageal cancer. Thoracic-laparoscopic esophagectomy can significantly improve the clinical results of patients with esophageal cancer. With better performance in surgery-related indicators, lower inflammatory factor levels and postoperative pain, and fewer postoperative complications, it will speed up patients' recovery and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

摘要

目的

探讨腹腔镜辅助胸腔镜食管癌切除术治疗食管癌患者的临床疗效及术后疼痛情况。

方法

选取2020年8月至2021年11月在我院收治并接受治疗的90例食管癌患者作为研究对象进行前瞻性分析,根据入院时间将患者平均分为对照组和试验组,每组45例。对照组患者接受传统开放手术,试验组患者接受腹腔镜辅助胸腔镜食管癌切除术。然后,比较两组患者的手术相关指标、术后疼痛、炎症因子及并发症情况。

结果

试验组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量及术后住院时间均显著短于或少于对照组(P<0.05);两组清扫淋巴结数目差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组中、重度疼痛患者数量显著少于对照组,轻度疼痛患者数量显著多于对照组(P<0.05)。试验组炎症因子(TNF-α、IL-6、IL-8和IL-10)水平显著低于对照组(P<0.05);试验组手术并发症发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜辅助胸腔镜食管癌切除术可显著提高食管癌患者的临床疗效。胸腔镜辅助腹腔镜食管癌切除术可显著改善食管癌患者的临床效果。在手术相关指标方面表现更佳,炎症因子水平及术后疼痛更低,术后并发症更少,能加快患者康复,值得临床推广应用。

相似文献

1
Clinical Effect and Postoperative Pain of Laparo-Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.腹腔镜辅助胸腔镜食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的临床疗效及术后疼痛情况
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jun 26;2022:4507696. doi: 10.1155/2022/4507696. eCollection 2022.
2
[Clinical application and analysis of single-port laparoscopic and thoracoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].单孔腹腔镜与胸腔镜McKeown食管癌切除术的临床应用与分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 3;101(29):2316-2321. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20201215-03359.
3
[Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma and gastro-esophageal anastomosis in thoracic cavity: analysis of 60 cases].[电视胸腔镜辅助食管癌切除术及胸腔内胃食管吻合术:60例分析]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Apr;51(4):354-7.
4
[Application of artificial pneumothorax in semi-prone position to the video-assisted thoracic surgery of esophageal carcinoma].人工气胸在半卧位应用于食管癌电视胸腔镜手术
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Oct;34(10):785-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.10.014.
5
Three-dimensional vs two-dimensional video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.三维与二维电视辅助胸腔镜食管癌切除术治疗食管癌患者的对比
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct 7;21(37):10675-82. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10675.
6
The usefulness of three-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients.三维电视辅助胸腔镜手术在食管癌患者中的应用价值。
Esophagus. 2019 Jul;16(3):272-277. doi: 10.1007/s10388-019-00661-4. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
7
[A retrospective comparison of thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy between right neck anastomosis and left neck anastomosis].[胸腔镜与腹腔镜食管切除术在右颈部吻合与左颈部吻合之间的回顾性比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 25;21(9):1008-1012.
8
[Application of mesoesophagus suspension technique in upper mediastinal lymph node dissection during thoracoscopic esophagectomy].中食管悬吊技术在胸腔镜食管癌切除术中上纵隔淋巴结清扫中的应用
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 25;19(9):999-1003.
9
[Comparison of thoracoscopic esophagectomy and traditional esophagectomy in radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer].[胸腔镜食管癌根治术与传统食管癌根治术在纵隔淋巴结清扫方面的比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;17(9):911-4.
10
Is thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy a better alternative to thoracoscopic esophagectomy?胸腔镜-腹腔镜食管切除术是否优于胸腔镜食管切除术?
Int J Surg. 2017 Dec;48:105-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.10.036. Epub 2017 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
How pragmatic are randomised controlled trials evaluating minimally invasive surgery for oesophageal cancer? A methodological review of trial design using the Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 (PRECIS-2) tool.评估食管癌微创手术的随机对照试验有多实用?使用实用-解释性连续统指标总结-2(PRECIS-2)工具对试验设计进行的方法学综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e078417. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078417.
2
Paravertebral Versus EPidural Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Esophageal ResectioN (PEPMEN): A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.微创食管切除术中椎旁阻滞与硬膜外镇痛的比较(PEPMEN):一项随机对照多中心试验
Ann Surg. 2025 Jul 1;282(1):29-36. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006551. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
3
Retracted: Clinical Effect and Postoperative Pain of Laparo-Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.撤稿:食管癌患者腹腔镜辅助胸腔镜食管癌切除术的临床疗效及术后疼痛
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2023 Dec 6;2023:9790841. doi: 10.1155/2023/9790841. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
s-CAM: An Untethered Insertable Laparoscopic Surgical Camera Robot with Non-Contact Actuation.s-CAM:一种无绳可插入腹腔镜手术摄像机器人,采用非接触式驱动。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 29;22(9):3405. doi: 10.3390/s22093405.
2
Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial).机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜食管切除术与微创食管切除术治疗可切除食管腺癌的随机对照试验(ROBOT-2 试验)。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Sep 26;21(1):1060. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08780-x.
3
A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy.胸腔镜与开放 McKeown 食管切除术的倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Feb;113(2):473-481. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
4
[Effect of thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy on postoperative immune function of patients with esophageal carcinoma].[胸腹腔镜联合食管癌切除术对食管癌患者术后免疫功能的影响]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2021 Jan 30;41(1):146-150. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2021.01.22.
5
Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.机器人辅助与胸腔镜辅助 McKeown 食管切除术治疗食管癌的长期疗效比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Dis Esophagus. 2021 Sep 9;34(9). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaa114.
6
Comparisons of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted and thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with extended two-field lymph node dissection for resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.机器人辅助与胸腹腔镜联合扩大二野淋巴结清扫术治疗可切除胸段食管鳞状细胞癌的短期疗效比较
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Sep;11(9):3874-3880. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.09.05.
7
Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for squamous cell esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.机器人辅助与胸腹腔镜联合McKeown食管癌切除术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的短期和中期结果:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Jun 15;33(6). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz080.
8
Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.食管和胃食管交界处癌,2019 年第 2 版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jul 1;17(7):855-883. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0033.
9
Recent advances in nuclear and hybrid detection modalities for image-guided surgery.核医学与杂交影像引导手术检测技术的最新进展。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019 Aug;16(8):711-734. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1642104. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
10
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil Improves Survival of Patients with Advanced Esophageal Cancer Compared with Conventional Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil.与顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶的传统同步放化疗相比,多西他赛、顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶同步放化疗可提高晚期食管癌患者的生存率。
J Cancer. 2018 Jul 16;9(16):2765-2772. doi: 10.7150/jca.23456. eCollection 2018.