Suppr超能文献

基于证据的无家可归者社会影响债券分析:一项范围审查

Evidence-Based Analysis of Social Impact Bonds for Homelessness: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Wang Huan, Xu Xiaoguang

机构信息

College of Economics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 20;13:823390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.823390. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Social impact bonds (SIBs) have emerged as an innovative financial instrument designed to support the social service sector in delivering innovative social programs. In particular, SIBs can be used to finance prevention of homelessness among those regarded as vulnerable. There is little evidence that outcomes from SIB-funded programs are significantly different compared to more traditional programs. This is the first scoping review of academic and gray literature that explores the main features and outcomes from all SIBs for homelessness based on evidence, addressing an important gap in the literature. The scoping review provides a transparent and comprehensive approach for mapping areas of this research. A total of 73 studies and articles were found eligible for inclusion. These concerned 32 SIBs for homelessness implemented in the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, and Belgium. The review found that academic papers on SIBs for homelessness lack evidence-based analysis, while gray literature lacks transparency, especially in evaluation method and outcome. We found that fourteen projects met their target outcomes. The common features of these SIBs were a navigator intervention model, effective partnership working, and use of Special Purpose Vehicles. Our findings show that it is necessary for the managers of SIBs to improve outcome metrics and evaluation methods, support target groups fairly, and attract more private investors to finance SIBs for better addressing homelessness.

摘要

社会影响债券(SIBs)已成为一种创新型金融工具,旨在支持社会服务部门实施创新型社会项目。特别是,SIBs可用于资助预防那些被视为弱势群体的无家可归问题。几乎没有证据表明,与更传统的项目相比,由SIBs资助的项目成果有显著差异。这是对学术文献和灰色文献的首次范围综述,基于证据探索了所有针对无家可归问题的SIBs的主要特征和成果,填补了文献中的一个重要空白。该范围综述为梳理本研究领域提供了一种透明且全面的方法。共发现73项研究和文章符合纳入标准。这些涉及在英国、美国、澳大利亚和比利时实施的32个针对无家可归问题的SIBs。综述发现,关于针对无家可归问题的SIBs的学术论文缺乏基于证据的分析,而灰色文献缺乏透明度,尤其是在评估方法和成果方面。我们发现有14个项目实现了其目标成果。这些SIBs的共同特征是导航干预模式、有效的伙伴关系合作以及特殊目的载体的使用。我们的研究结果表明,SIBs的管理者有必要改进成果指标和评估方法,公平地支持目标群体,并吸引更多私人投资者为SIBs提供资金,以更好地解决无家可归问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9626/9252447/aa236f06da5b/fpsyg-13-823390-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验