Amy S. Katz is with the Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Benjamin Brisbois is with the Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, and the Healthier Cities and Communities Hub, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto. Suzanne Zerger is with the Provincial System Support Program, Centre for Addictions and Mental Health, Toronto. Stephen W. Hwang is with the Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, University of Toronto.
Am J Public Health. 2018 Feb;108(2):210-215. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304157. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
Social Impact Bonds (SIBs) represent a new way to finance social service and health promotion programs whereby different types of investors provide an upfront investment of capital. If a given program meets predetermined criteria for a successful outcome, the government pays back investors with interest. Introduced in the United Kingdom in 2010, SIBs have since been implemented in the United States and across Europe, with some uptake in other jurisdictions. We identify and explore selected areas of concern related to SIBs, drawing from literature examining market-based reforms to health and social services and the evolution of the SIB funding mechanism. These areas of concern include increased costs to governments, restricted program scope, fragmented policymaking, undermining of public-sector service provision, mischaracterization of the root causes of social problems, and entrenchment of systemically produced vulnerabilities. We argue that it is essential to consider the long-term, aggregate, and contextualized effects of SIBs in order to evaluate their potential to contribute to public health. We conclude that such evaluations must explore the assumptions underlying the "common sense" arguments often used in support of SIBs.
社会影响债券(SIBs)代表了一种为社会服务和健康促进项目融资的新方式,不同类型的投资者提供前期资本投资。如果某个项目达到了成功结果的预定标准,政府将用利息回报投资者。SIBs 于 2010 年在英国推出,此后已在美国和欧洲实施,并在其他司法管辖区得到了一定程度的采用。我们从审查基于市场的医疗和社会服务改革以及 SIB 供资机制演变的文献中,确定并探讨了与 SIBs 相关的一些关注领域。这些关注领域包括政府成本增加、项目范围受限、决策分散、破坏公共部门服务提供、对社会问题根本原因的错误描述以及系统产生的脆弱性的巩固。我们认为,必须考虑 SIBs 的长期、总体和背景化影响,以评估其对公共卫生的潜在贡献。我们的结论是,此类评估必须探讨支持 SIBs 的“常识”论点所依据的假设。