Miller F B, Bond S J, Shumate C R, Polk H C, Richardson J D
Arch Surg. 1987 May;122(5):605-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400170111016.
During a five-year period, 104 patients underwent a pericardial window procedure to diagnose possible cardiac injury. Eighty-eight procedures were performed by a subxiphoid approach, and 16 were transdiaphragmatic in combination with an exploratory laparotomy. There were 51 patients with stab wounds, 45 with gunshot wounds, and eight with blunt trauma. All penetrating wounds were near the heart. In seven patients the window disclosed cardiac damage with no clinical signs of tamponade or shock. Fifty-one patients had signs of tamponade; however, only 12 of them had a cardiac injury diagnosed by pericardial window. Nineteen patients had cardiac injuries. One examination had false-negative results and one study had false-positive results. Cardiac wounds repaired included the right ventricle (eight), left ventricle (three), right atrium (five), and cardiac vein or pericardial wounds (three). Complications were negligible and consisted of minor wound infections (two) and postpericardiotomy syndromes (two). The pericardial window provides a rapid and safe means of diagnosing cardiac injuries in patients with equivocal signs of heart injury while sparing the patient without a heart wound a major operation.
在五年期间,104例患者接受了心包开窗术以诊断可能的心脏损伤。88例手术采用剑突下途径,16例经膈肌途径并联合剖腹探查术。有51例刺伤患者,45例枪伤患者,8例钝性创伤患者。所有穿透伤均靠近心脏。7例患者经心包开窗发现心脏损伤,但无心脏压塞或休克的临床体征。51例患者有心脏压塞体征;然而,其中只有12例经心包开窗诊断为心脏损伤。19例患者有心脏损伤。1次检查结果为假阴性,1项研究结果为假阳性。修复的心脏伤口包括右心室(8例)、左心室(3例)、右心房(5例)以及心脏静脉或心包伤口(3例)。并发症可忽略不计,包括轻微伤口感染(2例)和心包切开术后综合征(2例)。心包开窗为诊断心脏损伤体征不明确的患者提供了一种快速且安全的方法,同时使没有心脏伤口的患者免于接受大手术。