• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

功能质量在患者满意度中的重要性:美容注射患者体验探索性研究 - 第二部分

The Importance of Functional Quality in Patient Satisfaction: Cosmetic Injectable Patient Experience Exploratory Study-Part 2.

作者信息

McDonald Cara B, Heydenrych Izolda

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne.

出版信息

Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022 May 8;4:ojac044. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojac044. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1093/asjof/ojac044
PMID:35795885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9252022/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality assessment comprises 2 distinct forms: technical quality (TQ) and functional quality (FQ). On the one hand, TQ describes accuracy and excellence, the degree to which procedures are done "correctly." On the other hand, FQ is the way services are delivered and represents how the customer perceives and experiences the treatment or service.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative importance of functional quality factors in the care of cosmetic injectable patients and return patronage.

METHODS

The Cosmetic Injectable Patient Experience Exploratory Study (CIPEES) survey assessed reasons for return patronage to a specific cosmetic injector and the correlation between satisfaction with cosmetic results (patient assessment of TQ) and respondents' trust level in their practitioner, a marker for FQ.

RESULTS

The CIPEES survey collected 1488 responses across 75 countries, with 66% of participants completing all 15 questions. The respondents were 95.6% female and 4.4% male, with ages ranging from 18 years to >65 years old (median 33 years old). The number one ranked reason for returning to a previous cosmetic injector (return patronage) was "Trust in my practitioner's action and ability," closely followed by "Cosmetic result/outcome from the previous treatment/s." Respondents' level of satisfaction with their cosmetic results also correlated highly with trust in their practitioners.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to maximize patient satisfaction and return patronage, healthcare practitioners should focus on improving FQ care and value it at least as high as TQ in the delivery of cosmetic injectable treatments.

摘要

背景

质量评估包括两种不同形式:技术质量(TQ)和功能质量(FQ)。一方面,技术质量描述的是准确性和卓越性,即程序“正确”完成的程度。另一方面,功能质量是服务的提供方式,代表了客户对治疗或服务的感知和体验。

目的

确定功能质量因素在美容注射患者护理及回头率中的相对重要性。

方法

美容注射患者体验探索性研究(CIPEES)调查评估了患者再次光顾特定美容注射医生的原因,以及对美容效果的满意度(患者对技术质量的评估)与受访者对其医生的信任程度(功能质量的一个指标)之间的相关性。

结果

CIPEES调查在75个国家收集了1488份回复,66%的参与者完成了所有15个问题。受访者中女性占95.6%,男性占4.4%,年龄范围从18岁到65岁以上(中位数为33岁)。回到之前的美容注射医生(回头率)的首要原因是“信任我的医生的行为和能力”,其次是“之前治疗的美容效果/结果”。受访者对美容效果的满意度水平也与对医生的信任高度相关。

结论

为了最大限度地提高患者满意度和回头率,医疗从业者在提供美容注射治疗时应注重改善功能质量护理,并至少将其重视程度提高到与技术质量相同的水平。

相似文献

1
The Importance of Functional Quality in Patient Satisfaction: Cosmetic Injectable Patient Experience Exploratory Study-Part 2.功能质量在患者满意度中的重要性:美容注射患者体验探索性研究 - 第二部分
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022 May 8;4:ojac044. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojac044. eCollection 2022.
2
Factors Influencing Trust and Trustworthiness: Cosmetic Injectable Patient Experience Exploratory Study (CIPEES)-Part 3.影响信任与可信度的因素:美容注射患者体验探索性研究(CIPEES)- 第3部分
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022 Nov 7;4:ojac082. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojac082. eCollection 2022.
3
The Importance of Patient Mindset: Cosmetic Injectable Patient Experience Exploratory Study-Part 1.患者心态的重要性:美容注射患者体验探索性研究 - 第1部分
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022 May 8;4:ojac043. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojac043. eCollection 2022.
4
Effect of technical and functional quality on patient perceptions of pharmaceutical service quality.技术和功能质量对患者对药学服务质量认知的影响。
Pharm Res. 1999 Sep;16(9):1344-51. doi: 10.1023/a:1018934621859.
5
What do patients want? Technical quality versus functional quality: a literature review for plastic surgeons.患者需要什么?技术质量与功能质量:整形医生的文献综述。
Aesthet Surg J. 2012 Aug;32(6):751-9. doi: 10.1177/1090820X12452555.
6
The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.执业护士在骨科环境中的经验与成效:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-249.
7
Exploring relationships among pharmacy service use, patronage motives, and patient satisfaction.探讨药学服务利用、惠顾动机与患者满意度之间的关系。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2013 Jul-Aug;53(4):382-9. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2013.12100.
8
Consumer evaluation of complaint handling in the Dutch health insurance market.消费者对荷兰医疗保险市场投诉处理的评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Nov 15;11:310. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-310.
9
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined Use of HArmonyCa and Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: A Holistic Approach to Facial Rejuvenation.HarmonyCa与透明质酸填充剂联合使用:面部年轻化的整体方法。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Dec 24;12(12):e6360. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006360. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization (MFU-V) Effectiveness and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.可视化微聚焦超声(MFU-V)的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aesthet Surg J. 2025 Feb 18;45(3):NP86-NP94. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae228.
3
A 360° Approach to Patient Care in Aesthetic Facial Rejuvenation.

本文引用的文献

1
A Core Curriculum for Postgraduate Program in Nonsurgical Aesthetics: A Cross-sectional Delphi Study.非手术美容研究生课程核心课程:一项横断面德尔菲研究。
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022 Apr 11;4:ojac023. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojac023. eCollection 2022.
2
Encouraging Patient Engagement Behaviors from the Perspective of Functional Quality.从功能质量的角度鼓励患者参与行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 19;17(22):8613. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228613.
3
Do Physicians' Attitudes towards Patient-Centered Communication Promote Physicians' Intention and Behavior of Involving Patients in Medical Decisions?
面部年轻化美容中患者护理的360°方法。
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024 Aug 7;6:ojae059. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojae059. eCollection 2024.
4
Nonablative Fractional Diode Laser Resurfacing (1440 nm and 1927 nm) for Photoaged Skin.非剥脱性分次二极管激光换肤术(1440纳米和1927纳米)治疗光老化皮肤
Dermatol Surg. 2025 Jan 1;51(1):52-57. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000004379. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
5
Factors Influencing Trust and Trustworthiness: Cosmetic Injectable Patient Experience Exploratory Study (CIPEES)-Part 3.影响信任与可信度的因素:美容注射患者体验探索性研究(CIPEES)- 第3部分
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022 Nov 7;4:ojac082. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojac082. eCollection 2022.
医生对以患者为中心的沟通的态度是否能促进医生参与患者医疗决策的意愿和行为?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 2;17(17):6393. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176393.
4
Global Needs-Assessment for a Postgraduate Program on Nonsurgical Facial Aesthetics.全球非手术面部美学研究生课程需求评估。
Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Mar 12;41(4):501-510. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa054.
5
Key Communication Skills in Cosmetic Dermatology: A 3-Pillar Model.美容皮肤科的关键沟通技巧:一个三支柱模型。
Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed). 2019 Dec;110(10):794-799. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2019.01.010.
6
Patient-rated physician empathy and patient satisfaction during pain clinic consultations.患者评估的医师同理心与疼痛诊疗咨询中的患者满意度。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Nov;188(4):1379-1384. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-01999-5. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
7
Patient-physician relationship - Communication is the key.医患关系——沟通是关键。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;66(11):1527-1528. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1760_18.
8
A new tool to improve delivery of patient-engaged care and satisfaction in facial treatments: the Aesthetic Global Ranking Scale.一种改善面部治疗中患者参与式护理的提供和满意度的新工具:美学全球排名量表。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017 Mar;16(1):132-143. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12297. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
9
Facial Laxity Rating Scale Validation Study.面部松弛评定量表验证研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2016 Dec;42(12):1370-1379. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000915.
10
Factors impacting Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores in orthopedic surgery spine clinic.影响骨科脊柱门诊患者Press Ganey满意度评分的因素。
Spine J. 2016 Nov;16(11):1285-1289. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 Apr 12.