• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适合门诊腰椎融合手术患者的出院延迟因素。

Factors Causing Delay in Discharge in Patients Eligible for Ambulatory Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Aug 15;47(16):1137-1144. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004380. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000004380
PMID:35797654
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the postoperative factors that led delayed discharge in patients who would have been eligible for ambulatory lumbar fusion (ALF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Assessing postoperative inefficiencies is vital to increase the feasibility of ALF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and would have met the eligibility criteria for ALF were included. Length of stay (LOS); time in postanesthesia recovery unit (PACU); alertness and neurological examination, and pain scores at three and six hours; type of analgesia; time to physical therapy (PT) visit; reasons for PT nonclearance; time to per-oral (PO) intake; time to voiding; time to readiness for discharge were assessed. Time taken to meet each discharge criterion was calculated. Multiple regression analyses were performed to study the effect of variables on postoperative parameters influencing discharge.

RESULTS

Of 71 patients, 4% were discharged on the same day and 69% on postoperative day 1. PT clearance was the last-met discharge criterion in 93%. Sixty-six percent did not get PT evaluation on the day of surgery. Seventy-six percent required intravenous opioids and <60% had adequate pain control. Twenty-six percent had orthostatic intolerance. The median postoperative LOS was 26.9 hours, time in PACU was 4.2 hours, time to PO intake was 6.5 hours, time to first void was 6.3 hours, time to first PT visit was 17.7 hours, time to PT clearance was 21.8 hours, and time to discharge readiness was 21.9 hours. Regression analysis showed that time to PT clearance, time to PO intake, time to voiding, time in PACU, and pain score at three hours had a significant effect on LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Unavailability of PT, surgery after 1  pm , orthostatic intolerance, inadequate pain control, prolonged PACU stay, and long feeding and voiding times were identified as modifiable factors preventing same-day discharge.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

研究设计

前瞻性数据回顾。

目的

分析导致有资格行门诊腰椎融合术(ALF)的患者延迟出院的术后因素。

背景资料概要

评估术后效率低下对于增加 ALF 的可行性至关重要。

材料和方法

纳入接受单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术且符合 ALF 资格标准的患者。记录住院时间(LOS)、麻醉后恢复室(PACU)停留时间、清醒和神经检查、术后 3 小时和 6 小时的疼痛评分、镇痛类型、物理治疗(PT)就诊时间、PT 不通过的原因、经口(PO)摄入时间、排尿时间、准备出院时间。计算达到每个出院标准所需的时间。进行多元回归分析,以研究变量对影响出院的术后参数的影响。

结果

71 例患者中,4%在术后当天出院,69%在术后第 1 天出院。PT 评估通过是最后达到的出院标准,占 93%。66%的患者在手术当天未接受 PT 评估。76%的患者需要静脉使用阿片类药物,<60%的患者疼痛控制良好。26%的患者有体位不耐受。术后 LOS 的中位数为 26.9 小时,PACU 停留时间为 4.2 小时,PO 摄入时间为 6.5 小时,首次排尿时间为 6.3 小时,首次 PT 就诊时间为 17.7 小时,PT 评估通过时间为 21.8 小时,准备出院时间为 21.9 小时。回归分析显示,PT 评估通过时间、PO 摄入时间、排尿时间、PACU 停留时间以及术后 3 小时的疼痛评分对 LOS 有显著影响。

结论

PT 不可用、下午 1 点后手术、体位不耐受、疼痛控制不佳、PACU 停留时间延长以及进食和排尿时间延长被确定为阻止当天出院的可改变因素。

证据等级

4 级。

相似文献

1
Factors Causing Delay in Discharge in Patients Eligible for Ambulatory Lumbar Fusion Surgery.适合门诊腰椎融合手术患者的出院延迟因素。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Aug 15;47(16):1137-1144. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004380. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
2
Same-day discharge after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a series of 808 cases.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后当日出院:808 例系列研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1806-12. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3366-z. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
3
The effect of ketorolac on posterior minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an interim analysis from a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.研究背景:酮咯酸对经皮微创椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的中期分析。 研究目的:评估酮咯酸在经皮微创椎间孔腰椎体间融合术中的应用效果。 研究设计:前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。 研究地点:两家三级医院。 研究对象:2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 6 月,招募了 2017 名患者,均因单节段腰椎间盘疾病行单侧经皮微创椎间孔腰椎体间融合术。 干预措施:患者随机接受酮咯酸或安慰剂治疗。 主要结局测量指标:术后 1 天、3 天和 7 天的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)。 结果:在最终分析中,1971 名患者(酮咯酸组 992 名,安慰剂组 979 名)被纳入分析。与安慰剂组相比,酮咯酸组在术后 1 天和 3 天的 VAS 和 ODI 评分显著降低(P < 0.05)。术后 7 天,两组之间 VAS 和 ODI 评分无显著差异(P > 0.05)。两组患者均未发生严重不良反应。 结论:酮咯酸可有效减轻经皮微创椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后的疼痛和功能障碍,但在术后 7 天的效果与安慰剂组无显著差异。
Spine J. 2022 Jan;22(1):8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.08.011. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
4
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study.经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后加速康复:回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Spine J. 2022 Mar;22(3):399-410. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.007. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
5
Opioid-free anesthesia within an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: a retrospective matched cohort study.微创手术治疗腰椎疾病的加速康复外科路径下无阿片类药物麻醉:一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Apr 1;46(4):E8. doi: 10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18645.
6
Day one versus day zero postoperative physical therapy among patients with lumbar spinal fusion: a length of stay comparison.术后第一天与术后零天行腰椎融合术患者的物理治疗:住院时间比较。
Spine J. 2024 Jan;24(1):101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.08.007. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
7
Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.微创腰椎手术常见问题的实用解答。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.087. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
8
Predictive factors of hospital stay in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and instrumentation.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合内固定术患者住院时间的预测因素。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Nov 15;37(24):2046-54. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825c6688.
9
Outpatient Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody: Fusion Predictive Factors and Clinical Results.门诊微创腰椎椎间融合术:融合预测因素及临床结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41 Suppl 8:S106-22. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001479.
10
Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block Results in Opioid-Free Postoperative Recovery After Percutaneous/Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery.经皮/内镜经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后行胸腰筋膜平面阻滞可实现阿片类药物-free 术后康复。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Sep;153:e473-e480. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.152. Epub 2021 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Decompression Alone Versus Fusion for Predominant Back Pain.单纯微创减压与融合治疗以背痛为主的疗效比较
HSS J. 2025 Feb;21(1):42-48. doi: 10.1177/15563316231223503. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
2
Clinical Application of Different Doses of Hydromorphone Slow-Release Analgesia in Lumbar Fusion in Elderly Patients.不同剂量氢吗啡酮缓释镇痛在老年患者腰椎融合术中的临床应用
Pain Ther. 2024 Oct;13(5):1219-1233. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00632-3. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
3
Impact of age on comparative outcomes of decompression alone versus fusion for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis.
年龄对 L4 退变性脊椎滑脱单纯减压与融合手术比较结果的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Oct;33(10):3749-3759. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08336-0. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
4
Surgeon Perceptions of Performing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in an Ambulatory Surgical Center vs Hospital Setting in the Elderly Population: Results of a Surgeon Survey.外科医生对在门诊手术中心与医院环境中为老年人群实施经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的看法:一项外科医生调查结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 May 6;18(2):199-206. doi: 10.14444/8596.
5
Floor-Mounted Robotic Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 1,050 Screws.腰椎手术中地面安装式机器人椎弓根螺钉置入:1050枚螺钉的分析
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):577-586. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346070.035. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
6
Prevalence and associated factors of postoperative orthostatic intolerance at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022: cross sectional study.2022 年,在埃塞俄比亚西北部贡德尔大学综合专科医院,术后直立不耐受的流行情况及其相关因素:横断面研究。
BMC Surg. 2023 May 1;23(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02015-5.
7
Venous Thromboembolism Rates Have Not Decreased in Elective Lumbar Fusion Surgery from 2011 to 2020.2011年至2020年期间,择期腰椎融合手术的静脉血栓栓塞发生率并未下降。
Global Spine J. 2024 Nov;14(8):2270-2278. doi: 10.1177/21925682231173642. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
8
Poor muscle health and low preoperative ODI are independent predictors for slower achievement of MCID after minimally invasive decompression.肌肉健康状况差和术前 ODI 低是微创减压后达到 MCID 较慢的独立预测因素。
Spine J. 2023 Aug;23(8):1152-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
9
Lumbar fusion during the COVID-19 pandemic: greater rates of morbidity and longer procedures.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的腰椎融合术:更高的发病率和更长的手术时间。
J Spine Surg. 2023 Mar 30;9(1):73-82. doi: 10.21037/jss-22-45. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
10
Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries.门诊手术中心与传统医院环境下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的比较,第2部分:医疗保险受益人的手术安全性评估
J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 22;13(3):566. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030566.