• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估老年脓毒症患者住院期间的死亡风险:衰弱和急性器官功能障碍的作用。

Assessing the mortality risk in older patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of sepsis: the role of frailty and acute organ dysfunction.

机构信息

Acute Geriatric Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, MB, Italy.

Department of Statistic and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, MI, Italy.

出版信息

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022 Oct;34(10):2335-2343. doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02182-0. Epub 2022 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1007/s40520-022-02182-0
PMID:35799097
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A prognostic stratification of mortality risk in older patients with sepsis admitted to medical wards is often challenging.

AIMS

To evaluate the ability of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, serum biomarkers (lactate and C-Reactive Protein, CRP), and measures of comorbidity and frailty in predicting in-hospital and 6-month mortality in a cohort of older patients admitted to an Acute Geriatric Unit (AGU) with a diagnosis of sepsis.

METHODS

All patients aged 70 years and over consecutively admitted to our AGU with sepsis in the study period were included. At admission, a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment including two measures of frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS], Frailty Index [FI]) was obtained. To assess the predictivity of candidate prognostic markers, the Area Under the Receiver-Operating Characteristic (AUROC) curves were analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

We included 240 patients (median age = 85, IQR = 80-89, 40.8% women), of whom 33.8% died before discharge, and 60.4% at 6 months. The SOFA score (AUROC = 0.678, 95% CI 0.610-0.747) and CRP serum levels (AUROC = 0.606, 95% CI 0.532-0.680) were good predictors of in-hospital mortality. The CFS (AUROC = 0.703, 95% CI 0.637-0.768) and the FI (AUROC = 0.677, 95% CI 0.607-0.746) better predicted 6-month mortality. Results of the regression analysis confirmed the findings of the AUROC study. The combined assessment of SOFA and measures of frailty improved the performance of the model both in the short and the long term.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the severity of organ dysfunction and frailty scores should be addressed on AGU admission to establish the short- and long-term outcomes of older patients with sepsis.

摘要

背景

对入住内科病房的老年脓毒症患者进行死亡率风险的预后分层往往具有挑战性。

目的

评估序贯器官衰竭评估 (SOFA) 评分、血清生物标志物(乳酸和 C 反应蛋白,CRP)以及合并症和虚弱程度测量值在预测入住急性老年病房 (AGU) 的老年脓毒症患者的院内和 6 个月死亡率方面的能力。

方法

本研究纳入了在研究期间因脓毒症而连续入住我们 AGU 的所有 70 岁及以上患者。入院时,进行了全面的老年评估,包括两种虚弱程度测量方法(临床虚弱量表 [CFS]、虚弱指数 [FI])。为了评估候选预后标志物的预测能力,分析了受试者工作特征曲线下的面积(AUROC)。还进行了多变量逻辑回归分析。

结果

我们纳入了 240 名患者(中位年龄 85 岁,IQR 80-89 岁,40.8%为女性),其中 33.8%在出院前死亡,60.4%在 6 个月时死亡。SOFA 评分(AUROC=0.678,95%CI 0.610-0.747)和 CRP 血清水平(AUROC=0.606,95%CI 0.532-0.680)是院内死亡率的良好预测指标。CFS(AUROC=0.703,95%CI 0.637-0.768)和 FI(AUROC=0.677,95%CI 0.607-0.746)更好地预测了 6 个月死亡率。回归分析的结果证实了 AUROC 研究的发现。SOFA 和虚弱程度测量值的联合评估提高了短期和长期模型的性能。

结论

入住 AGU 时应评估器官功能障碍的严重程度和虚弱评分,以确定老年脓毒症患者的短期和长期结局。

相似文献

1
Assessing the mortality risk in older patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of sepsis: the role of frailty and acute organ dysfunction.评估老年脓毒症患者住院期间的死亡风险:衰弱和急性器官功能障碍的作用。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022 Oct;34(10):2335-2343. doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02182-0. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
2
[A 180-day mortality predictive score based on frailty syndrome in elderly patients with sepsis: a Logistic regression analysis model].基于脓毒症老年患者衰弱综合征的180天死亡率预测评分:Logistic回归分析模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):257-262. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201027-00688.
3
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
4
Prognostic accuracy of the serum lactate level, the SOFA score and the qSOFA score for mortality among adults with Sepsis.血清乳酸水平、SOFA 评分和 qSOFA 评分对成人脓毒症死亡率的预后准确性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Apr 30;27(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0609-3.
5
Predictive Value of Frailty Index in Comparison to Traditional Markers of Sepsis in Predicting Mortality among Elderly Admitted in Tertiary Care Hospital.衰弱指数预测价值与传统脓毒症标志物在预测三级医院老年患者死亡率中的比较。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2022 Sep;70(9):11-12. doi: 10.5005/japi-11001-0094.
6
Validation of prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among cardiac-, thoracic-, and vascular-surgery patients admitted to a cardiothoracic intensive care unit.入住心胸重症监护病房的心脏、胸科和血管手术患者中,序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准及快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分对院内死亡率预后准确性的验证。
J Card Surg. 2020 Jan;35(1):118-127. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14331. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
7
[Lactic acid, lactate clearance and procalcitonin in assessing the severity and predicting prognosis in sepsis].[乳酸、乳酸清除率及降钙素原在评估脓毒症严重程度及预测预后中的作用]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Apr;32(4):449-453. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200129-00086.
8
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
9
[Prognostic value of Charlson weighted index of comorbidities combined with sequential organ failure assessment score and procalcitonin in patients with sepsis].[脓毒症患者中Charlson合并症加权指数联合序贯器官衰竭评估评分及降钙素原的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Nov;31(11):1335-1339. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.11.005.
10
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: a multicentre, cross-sectional study.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分预测越南重症监护病房脓毒症患者死亡率:一项多中心、横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 14;13(3):e064870. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064870.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of sarcopenia and its association with frailty and malnutrition among older patients with sepsis-a cross-sectional study in the emergency department.老年脓毒症患者中肌肉减少症的患病率及其与衰弱和营养不良的关系——急诊科的一项横断面研究
BMC Geriatr. 2025 May 27;25(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06060-y.
2
Enhancing in-hospital mortality prediction in older patients with sepsis: the role of frailty indices and multidrug-resistance status in non-ICU wards-a proof-of-concept study.提高老年脓毒症患者的院内死亡率预测:虚弱指数和多重耐药状态在非重症监护病房中的作用——一项概念验证研究
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Feb 22;37(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-02955-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Frailty is associated with long-term outcome in patients with sepsis who are over 80 years old: results from an observational study in 241 European ICUs.衰弱与 80 岁以上脓毒症患者的长期预后相关:241 家欧洲 ICU 的观察性研究结果。
Age Ageing. 2021 Sep 11;50(5):1719-1727. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab036.
2
A classification tree to assist with routine scoring of the Clinical Frailty Scale.一种用于辅助临床衰弱量表常规评分的分类树。
Age Ageing. 2021 Jun 28;50(4):1406-1411. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab006.
3
Predictive Factors of In-Hospital Mortality in Older Adults with Community-Acquired Bloodstream Infection.
Mortality rate analysis of patients on invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit on day 28.
重症监护病房中接受有创机械通气患者第28天的死亡率分析。
Biomed Rep. 2024 Aug 1;21(4):140. doi: 10.3892/br.2024.1828. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Inflammaging in Multidrug-Resistant Sepsis of Geriatric ICU Patients and Healthcare Challenges.老年重症监护病房患者多重耐药性脓毒症中的炎症衰老与医疗挑战
Geriatrics (Basel). 2024 Apr 3;9(2):45. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics9020045.
5
The critically ill older patient with sepsis: a narrative review.患有脓毒症的老年重症患者:一篇叙述性综述
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Jan 10;14(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01233-7.
6
An immune genes signature for predicting mortality in sepsis patients.一个用于预测脓毒症患者死亡率的免疫基因特征。
Front Immunol. 2023 Feb 13;14:1000431. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1000431. eCollection 2023.
社区获得性血流感染老年患者院内死亡的预测因素
J Frailty Aging. 2020;9(4):232-237. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2019.45.
4
Sepsis at ICU admission does not decrease 30-day survival in very old patients: a post-hoc analysis of the VIP1 multinational cohort study.重症监护病房(ICU)入院时的脓毒症不会降低高龄患者的30天生存率:VIP1多国队列研究的事后分析
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 May 13;10(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00672-w.
5
Frailty in Critical Care Medicine: A Review.危重病医学中的衰弱:综述。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Jun;130(6):1462-1473. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004665.
6
Frailty and Associated Outcomes and Resource Utilization Among Older ICU Patients With Suspected Infection.老年 ICU 疑似感染患者的虚弱状况及相关结局和资源利用。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;47(8):e669-e676. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003831.
7
Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.腹腔镜下女性尿失禁悬吊术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 27;7(7):CD002239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002239.pub3.
8
Sepsis in Older Adults.老年人脓毒症。
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017 Dec;31(4):731-742. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2017.07.010.
9
Frailty and usage of health care systems: Results from the South Australian Monitoring and Surveillance System (SAMSS).衰弱与医疗保健系统的使用:南澳大利亚监测与监督系统(SAMSS)的结果。
Maturitas. 2017 Oct;104:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
10
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016 年版。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.