Suppr超能文献

46个国家视力筛查项目的全面概述

A Comprehensive Overview of Vision Screening Programmes across 46 Countries.

作者信息

Carlton Jill, Griffiths Helen J, Mazzone Paolo, Horwood Anna M, Sloot Frea

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, UK.

Division of Ophthalmology & Orthoptics, Health Sciences School, University of Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Br Ir Orthopt J. 2022 Jun 10;18(1):27-47. doi: 10.22599/bioj.260. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe and compare vision screening programmes and identify variance in number and type of tests used, timing of screening, personnel involved, monitoring and funding to be used as data for optimising, disinvesting or implementing future screening programmes.

METHODS

A questionnaire consisting of nine domains: demography & epidemiology, administration & general background, existing screening, coverage & attendance, tests, follow-up & diagnosis, treatment, cost & benefit and adverse effects was completed by Country Representatives (CRs) recruited from 47 countries.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was sufficiently completed for 46 Countries: 42 European countries, China, India, Malawi and Rwanda. Variation of provision was found in; age of screening (0-17 years), tests included (23), types of visual acuity (VA) test used (35 different optotypes), personnel (13), number of screens per child (median 5, range 1-32), and times VA tested (median 3, range 1-30). Infant screening is offered in all countries, whereas childhood vision screening is offered at least once in all countries, but not all regions of each country. All 46 countries provide vision screening between the ages of 3-7 years. Data on screening outcomes for quality assurance was not available from most countries; complete evaluation data was available in 2% of countries, partial data from 43%.

CONCLUSION

Vision screening is highly variable. Some form of VA testing is being undertaken during childhood. Data collection and sharing should be improved to facilitate comparison and to be able to optimise vision screening programmes between regions and countries.

摘要

目的

描述和比较视力筛查项目,确定所使用的测试数量和类型、筛查时间、参与人员、监测及资金方面的差异,将其作为优化、减少投入或实施未来筛查项目的数据。

方法

来自47个国家的国家代表(CRs)完成了一份包含九个领域的问卷:人口统计学与流行病学、管理与一般背景、现有筛查、覆盖率与参与率、测试、随访与诊断、治疗、成本与效益以及不良反应。

结果

46个国家充分完成了问卷:42个欧洲国家、中国、印度、马拉维和卢旺达。在以下方面发现了提供情况的差异:筛查年龄(0至17岁)、包含的测试(23种)、所使用的视力(VA)测试类型(35种不同视标)、人员(13种)、每个儿童的筛查次数(中位数为5,范围为1至32次)以及VA测试次数(中位数为3,范围为1至30次)。所有国家都提供婴儿筛查,而所有国家至少提供一次儿童视力筛查,但并非每个国家的所有地区都提供。所有46个国家在3至7岁之间提供视力筛查。大多数国家没有提供用于质量保证的筛查结果数据;2%的国家有完整的评估数据,43%的国家有部分数据。

结论

视力筛查差异很大。在儿童时期正在进行某种形式的VA测试。应改进数据收集和共享,以促进比较,并能够优化不同地区和国家之间的视力筛查项目。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adeb/9187246/64eaf1c55539/bioj-18-1-260-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验