• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰在 6-24 个月龄时对所有人群进行常规眼科视功能筛查的效果。

Effectiveness of routine population-wide orthoptic preschool vision screening tests at age 6-24 months in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Child Healthcare, Icare, Meppel, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb;100(1):e100-e114. doi: 10.1111/aos.14859. Epub 2021 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1111/aos.14859
PMID:33817982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9290114/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The effectiveness of preverbal orthoptic tests at age 6, 9, 14 and 24 months in population-wide screening was assessed.

METHODS

Two consecutive birth cohorts at 134 centres were compared. At general health screening visits, children born July-December 2011 were vision screened four times between 6 and 24 months with inspection, pupillary reflexes, eye motility, Hirschberg, cover test and monocular pursuit. Children born January-June 2012 were vision screened at general screening visits only in case of visually apparent abnormalities or positive family history. After referral, cause and severity of amblyopia were determined. Visual acuity was measured in all children at 36 and 45 months.

RESULTS

The control and intervention group comprised 5649 versus 5162 children. Amblyopia was diagnosed in 185 (3.3%) versus 159 children (3.1%), outside of screening in 21 (11.4%) versus 25 (15.7%). Between 6 and 24 months, 44 (23.8%) versus 27 (17%) (RR = 0.67 [95% CI 0.42, 1.09]) were referred and after visual acuity (VA) measurement 120 (64.9%) versus 107 (67.3%). Of 109 versus 108 children with refractive or bilateral amblyopia, 94 (86.2%) versus 92 (85.2%) were detected with VA measurements. Visual acuity of the amblyopic eye, after referral, was not significantly different between groups (p 0.896), nor was the time to amblyopia diagnosis (intention to screen [p 0.55]; per protocol [p 0.11]).

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of vision screening was not influenced by omission of orthoptic tests at general health screening at 6-24 months. Refractive and bilateral amblyopia were almost exclusively found by VA measurements.

摘要

目的

评估在 6、9、14 和 24 个月龄时进行预语言性视轴矫正测试在人群广泛筛查中的效果。

方法

比较了在 134 个中心连续进行的两个出生队列。在一般健康筛查访视中,2011 年 7 月至 12 月出生的儿童在 6 至 24 个月期间接受了 4 次视力筛查,检查内容包括视力、瞳孔反射、眼球运动、Hirschberg 测试、遮盖试验和单眼追踪。2012 年 1 月至 6 月出生的儿童仅在出现明显的视觉异常或阳性家族史时,才在一般筛查访视中接受视力筛查。转诊后,确定弱视的原因和严重程度。所有儿童在 36 和 45 个月时测量视力。

结果

对照组和干预组分别包括 5649 名和 5162 名儿童。在筛查之外诊断出弱视的儿童分别为 185 名(3.3%)和 159 名(3.1%),转诊的儿童分别为 44 名(23.8%)和 27 名(17%)(RR=0.67 [95% CI 0.42, 1.09]),在视力测量后分别为 120 名(64.9%)和 107 名(67.3%)。在 109 名和 108 名患有屈光不正性或双侧弱视的儿童中,分别有 94 名(86.2%)和 92 名(85.2%)通过视力测量发现。转诊后的弱视眼视力在两组间无显著差异(p=0.896),弱视诊断时间也无差异(意向筛查时 [p=0.55];按方案筛查时 [p=0.11])。

结论

在 6-24 个月龄的一般健康筛查中省略视轴矫正测试并不影响视力筛查的效果。屈光不正性和双侧弱视几乎都是通过视力测量发现的。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of routine population-wide orthoptic preschool vision screening tests at age 6-24 months in the Netherlands.荷兰在 6-24 个月龄时对所有人群进行常规眼科视功能筛查的效果。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb;100(1):e100-e114. doi: 10.1111/aos.14859. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
2
Semistructured Observation of Population-based Eye Screening in The Netherlands.荷兰基于人群的眼部筛查的半结构化观察
Strabismus. 2017 Dec;25(4):214-221. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2017.1395596. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
3
Effect of omission of population-based eye screening at age 6-9 months in the Netherlands.荷兰6至9个月龄儿童基于人群的眼部筛查遗漏的影响。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun;93(4):318-21. doi: 10.1111/aos.12556. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
4
Final Visual Outcomes and Treatment Received for Children Referred from a UK Primary School Visual Screening Program: A Comparison of An Orthoptic-led Program with Orthoptic-delivered Services.英国小学视力筛查项目转诊儿童的最终视力结果及接受的治疗:以视光师主导项目与视光师提供服务的比较
Strabismus. 2017 Dec;25(4):184-190. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2017.1392988. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
5
High rate of failed visual-acuity measurements with the Amsterdam Picture Chart in screening at the age of 36 months.在 36 个月龄的筛查中,使用阿姆斯特丹图片图表进行视力测量的失败率很高。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;97(1):24-28. doi: 10.1111/aos.13898. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
6
Evaluation of the Spot Vision Screener in comparison with the orthoptic examination in visual screening in 3-5 year-old schoolchildren.3至5岁学童视力筛查中,视力筛查仪与眼科检查的比较评估
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020 May;43(5):411-416. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2019.10.006. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
7
Rotterdam AMblyopia screening effectiveness study: detection and causes of amblyopia in a large birth cohort.鹿特丹弱视筛查效果研究:在一个大型出生队列中弱视的检出率及病因。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Jul;51(7):3476-84. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3352. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
8
Effectiveness of screening for amblyopia and other eye disorders in a prospective birth cohort study.前瞻性出生队列研究中弱视及其他眼部疾病的筛查效果。
J Med Screen. 2013 Jun;20(2):66-72. doi: 10.1177/0969141313497355. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
9
Accuracy of referrals from an orthoptic vision screening program for 3- to 4-year-old preschool children.针对3至4岁学龄前儿童的斜视视力筛查项目转诊的准确性。
J AAPOS. 2012 Feb;16(1):49-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.06.013. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
10
The assessment and management of strabismus and amblyopia: a national audit.斜视与弱视的评估和管理:一项全国性审计。
Eye (Lond). 2002 Sep;16(5):522-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700136.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Overview of Vision Screening Programmes across 46 Countries.46个国家视力筛查项目的全面概述
Br Ir Orthopt J. 2022 Jun 10;18(1):27-47. doi: 10.22599/bioj.260. eCollection 2022.
2
The cost-effectiveness of different visual acuity screening strategies in three European countries: A microsimulation study.三个欧洲国家不同视力筛查策略的成本效益:一项微观模拟研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Jun 27;28:101868. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101868. eCollection 2022 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Plusoptix photoscreener use for paediatric vision screening in Flanders and Iran.Plusoptix 照片筛查仪在弗兰德斯和伊朗用于儿科视力筛查。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb;98(1):80-88. doi: 10.1111/aos.14144. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
2
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Immediate versus Delayed Glasses for Moderate Hyperopia in 1- and 2-Year-Olds.1-2 岁中高度远视儿童即时配镜与延迟配镜的随机临床试验。
Ophthalmology. 2019 Jun;126(6):876-887. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.049. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
3
High rate of failed visual-acuity measurements with the Amsterdam Picture Chart in screening at the age of 36 months.
在 36 个月龄的筛查中,使用阿姆斯特丹图片图表进行视力测量的失败率很高。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;97(1):24-28. doi: 10.1111/aos.13898. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
4
Semistructured Observation of Population-based Eye Screening in The Netherlands.荷兰基于人群的眼部筛查的半结构化观察
Strabismus. 2017 Dec;25(4):214-221. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2017.1395596. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
5
Inventory of current EU paediatric vision and hearing screening programmes.欧盟当前儿科视力和听力筛查项目清单。
J Med Screen. 2015 Jun;22(2):55-64. doi: 10.1177/0969141315572403. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
6
Effect of omission of population-based eye screening at age 6-9 months in the Netherlands.荷兰6至9个月龄儿童基于人群的眼部筛查遗漏的影响。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun;93(4):318-21. doi: 10.1111/aos.12556. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
7
Determinants and outcome of unsuccessful referral after positive screening in a large birth-cohort study of population-based vision screening.在一项基于人群的视力筛查大型出生队列研究中,阳性筛查后转诊未成功的决定因素及结果。
J AAPOS. 2011 Jun;15(3):256-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.01.159.
8
Effect of age on response to amblyopia treatment in children.年龄对儿童弱视治疗反应的影响。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Nov;129(11):1451-7. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.179. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
9
Rotterdam AMblyopia screening effectiveness study: detection and causes of amblyopia in a large birth cohort.鹿特丹弱视筛查效果研究:在一个大型出生队列中弱视的检出率及病因。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Jul;51(7):3476-84. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3352. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
10
Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in white and African American children aged 6 through 71 months the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study.6至71个月大的白种和非裔美国儿童弱视与斜视的患病率:巴尔的摩小儿眼病研究
Ophthalmology. 2009 Nov;116(11):2128-34.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.034. Epub 2009 Sep 16.