Endoscopy Center, Ningbo No.9 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Emergency Department of Ningbo Yinzhou No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 8;101(27):e29897. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029897.
To evaluate the effects on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score with different bowel preparation times and dosages.
Six hundred patients who underwent colonoscopy in the Endoscopy Center of Ningbo No.9 Hospital in 2021 were recruited and randomly assigned to 3 groups: Group A: "4-hour 1 + 2L" bowel preparation regimen; Group B: "6-hour 1 + 2L" bowel preparation regimen; and Group C: "4-hour 0 + 2L" bowel preparation regimen. BBPS score among these groups is compared and analyzed in the Statistical Product and Service Solutions software.
There was no difference in baseline characteristics among the three groups of patients (P > .05). There was no significant difference in the BBPS score between Group B and Group C, whereas the BBPS score in Group A was significantly higher than that in Groups B and C (P < .05).
The "4-hour 1 + 2L" bowel preparation regimen can obtain higher BBPS score for colonoscopy, which is suggested to be the optimal plan for colonoscopy patients of the time and dosage. Definitely, higher BBPS score can improve the quality of colonoscopy diagnosis and treatment consequence.
评估不同肠道准备时间和剂量对波士顿肠道准备量表（BBPS）评分的影响。
2021 年，招募了在宁波市第九医院内镜中心接受结肠镜检查的 600 名患者，并将其随机分为 3 组：A 组：“4 小时 1+2L”肠道准备方案；B 组：“6 小时 1+2L”肠道准备方案；C 组：“4 小时 0+2L”肠道准备方案。在统计产品和服务解决方案软件中比较和分析这些组的 BBPS 评分。
三组患者的基线特征无差异（P＞.05）。B 组和 C 组的 BBPS 评分无显著差异，而 A 组的 BBPS 评分明显高于 B 组和 C 组（P＜.05）。
“4 小时 1+2L”肠道准备方案可获得更高的结肠镜 BBPS 评分，建议将其作为时间和剂量的结肠镜患者的最佳方案。肯定的是，更高的 BBPS 评分可以提高结肠镜诊断和治疗效果的质量。
