Rezamand Gholamreza, Joukar Farahnaz, Amini-Salehi Ehsan, Delam Hamed, Zare Reza, Samadi Alireza, Mavadati Sara, Hassanipour Soheil, Mansour-Ghanaei Fariborz
Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Student Research Committee, Larestan University of Medical Sciences, Larestan, Iran.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 9;23(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02987-x.
Bowel preparation is a crucial factor affecting the diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopy, and few randomized control trials evaluated enhancement in bowel preparation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of walking exercises on bowel preparation before a colonoscopy procedure.
The present study is a single-blind randomized controlled trial involving 262 patients scheduled for colonoscopy procedures. These patients were randomly assigned to two groups: an intervention group (n = 131) and a control group (n = 131). In the intervention group, participants followed a predetermined plan that included the consumption of specific liquids and foods, bisacodyl pills, polyethylene glycol powder, and a regimen of walking exercises in preparation for their colonoscopy. Conversely, individuals in the control group followed the same regimen but were not instructed to engage in walking exercises. On the day of the colonoscopy, both groups were assessed for their level of physical activity using a foot counter. Additionally, an experienced gastroenterologist evaluated and compared the bowel preparation between the two groups using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).
The number of footsteps recorded in the two groups exhibited a significant difference (P < 0.001). Although there was no statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups in terms of mean BBPS scores (6.26 ± 1.9 vs. 6.29 ± 1.9, P = 0.416), individuals who took more than 6900 steps had significantly higher BBPS scores compared to those with fewer than 6900 footsteps (6.62 ± 1.8 vs. 5.92 ± 1.9, P = 0.003).In the univariate analysis, BBPS was found to be significantly associated with individuals under the age of 50 (OR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.30-4.61, P = 0.006) and smoking status (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.17-0.94, P = 0.043). In the multivariate analysis, the relationship between BBPS and age below 50 and smoking remained significant (OR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.30-4.70, P = 0.005, and OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.16-0.93, P = 0.034, respectively).
A higher number of footsteps taken especially more than 6900 can significantly enhance bowel preparation; however, walking exercise as an intervention before colonoscopy is not significantly associated with BBPS. Also, older people and smokers seem to have fewer benefits from walking exercises for bowel preparation.
ISRCTN32724024 (Registration date:22/08/2018).
肠道准备是影响结肠镜检查诊断准确性的关键因素,而评估肠道准备效果增强的随机对照试验较少。在本研究中,我们旨在评估步行锻炼对结肠镜检查前肠道准备的有效性。
本研究是一项单盲随机对照试验,纳入了262例计划进行结肠镜检查的患者。这些患者被随机分为两组:干预组(n = 131)和对照组(n = 131)。干预组参与者遵循预定计划,包括饮用特定液体和食物、服用比沙可啶片、聚乙二醇粉,并进行步行锻炼方案以准备结肠镜检查。相反,对照组个体遵循相同方案,但未被指示进行步行锻炼。在结肠镜检查当天,使用步数计数器评估两组的身体活动水平。此外,由经验丰富的胃肠病学家使用波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评估并比较两组的肠道准备情况。
两组记录的步数存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。虽然干预组和对照组的平均BBPS评分无统计学显著差异(6.26 ± 1.9 vs. 6.29 ± 1.9,P = 0.416),但步数超过6900步的个体的BBPS评分显著高于步数少于6900步的个体(6.62 ± 1.8 vs. 5.92 ± 1.9,P = 0.003)。在单因素分析中,发现BBPS与50岁以下个体(OR:2.45,95% CI:1.30 - 4.61,P = 0.006)和吸烟状况(OR:0.41,95% CI:0.17 - 0.94,P = 0.043)显著相关。在多因素分析中,BBPS与50岁以下年龄和吸烟之间的关系仍然显著(OR:2.50,95% CI:1.30 - 4.70,P = 0.005,以及OR:0.38,95% CI:0.16 - 0.93,P = 0.034)。
步数较多,尤其是超过6900步,可以显著增强肠道准备;然而,步行锻炼作为结肠镜检查前的干预措施与BBPS无显著关联。此外,老年人和吸烟者似乎从步行锻炼进行肠道准备中获益较少。
ISRCTN32724024(注册日期:2018年8月22日)