• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于新型全流程机器人手臂辅助全髋关节置换术中假体定位准确性的前瞻性随机对照试验。

Prospective randomized controlled trial on the accuracy of prosthesis positioning in total hip arthroplasty assisted by a newly designed whole-process robotic arm.

作者信息

Wang Wenzhe, Zhang Zian, Wang Guanrong, Rong Chun, Xu Hao, Lu Xinzhe, Liu Yikai, Li Chenkai, Zhang Haining

机构信息

Department of Joint Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China.

Nursing Department of Operating Room, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2023 Feb;47(2):413-419. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05501-2. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00264-022-05501-2
PMID:35802187
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this article is to study whether the newly designed whole-process total hip arthroplasty (THA) robotic arm can improve the accuracy of prosthesis placement in THA.

METHOD

In this study, 72 patients undergoing THA were prospectively included and randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group was treated with THA assisted by a newly designed robotic arm. The control group received THA with conventional surgical methods. The imaging data were compared after operation.

RESULT

Compared with the conventional operation, the whole-process robotic arm can more accurately place the acetabular prosthesis in the anteversion safe zone of 5 ~ 25°, but in terms of the inclination angle, whether the reference is the safe zone of 30 ~ 50° or 30 ~ 45°, there is no statistical difference between the two groups. The average lower limb length discrepancy (LLLD) in the experimental group was 3.77 ± 8.31 mm longer than contralateral side, while the counterpart in the control group was 8.39 ± 9.11 mm, with significant difference (P = 0.029). The femoral prosthesis was fixed in neutral position in 35 (100%) cases in the experimental group and only 30 (83.3%) in the control group (P = 0.036). There was no significant difference in the recovery of hip offset, femoral anteversion, and canal fill ratio (CFR) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Robotic arm can improve the accuracy of anteversion of acetabular cup, restore the consistency of the length of lower limbs, and more accurately implant the femoral prosthesis to the neutral position in the coronal position.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100044124 (date of registration: 2021-3-11).

摘要

引言

本文旨在研究新设计的全流程全髋关节置换术(THA)机器人手臂能否提高THA中假体植入的准确性。

方法

本研究前瞻性纳入72例行THA的患者,并随机分为两组。实验组采用新设计的机器人手臂辅助进行THA。对照组采用传统手术方法进行THA。术后比较影像学数据。

结果

与传统手术相比,全流程机器人手臂能更准确地将髋臼假体放置在5°至25°的前倾角安全区内,但在倾斜角度方面,无论参考的是30°至50°还是30°至45°的安全区,两组之间均无统计学差异。实验组平均下肢长度差异(LLLD)比对侧长3.77±8.31毫米,而对照组为8.39±9.11毫米,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.029)。实验组35例(100%)股骨假体固定于中立位,对照组仅30例(83.3%)(P = 0.036)。两组在髋关节偏移、股骨前倾角和髓腔填充率(CFR)恢复方面无显著差异。

结论

机器人手臂可提高髋臼杯前倾角的准确性,恢复下肢长度的一致性,并更准确地将股骨假体植入冠状位的中立位。

临床试验注册号

ChiCTR2100044124(注册日期:2021年3月11日)。

相似文献

1
Prospective randomized controlled trial on the accuracy of prosthesis positioning in total hip arthroplasty assisted by a newly designed whole-process robotic arm.一项关于新型全流程机器人手臂辅助全髋关节置换术中假体定位准确性的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Int Orthop. 2023 Feb;47(2):413-419. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05501-2. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
2
Accuracy and safety of a new robotic arm for both femoral and acetabular side in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.新型机械臂在全髋关节置换术中股骨侧和髋臼侧的准确性和安全性:尸体研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Nov 3;18(1):830. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04263-w.
3
The learning curve of robotic-arm assisted acetabular cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty.机器人辅助髋臼杯定位在全髋关节置换术中的学习曲线。
Hip Int. 2021 May;31(3):311-319. doi: 10.1177/1120700019889334. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
4
Total Hip Arthroplasty with Robotic Arm Assistance for Precise Cup Positioning: A Case-Control Study.机器人辅助全髋关节置换术精准髋臼杯定位:一项病例对照研究。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Jul;14(7):1498-1505. doi: 10.1111/os.13334. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
5
Supine versus lateral position for accurate positioning of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using the modified Watson-Jones approach: A randomized single-blind controlled trial.改良 Watson-Jones 入路全髋关节置换术中仰卧位与侧卧位对髋臼杯准确定位的比较:一项随机单盲对照试验。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Sep;105(5):915-922. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
6
Robotic-Arm Assisted Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty; Improving Implant Accuracy.机器人辅助直接前侧入路全髋关节置换术;提高植入物准确性。
Surg Technol Int. 2020 May 20;38:347-352. doi: 10.52198/21.STI.38.OS1368.
7
Acetabular cup placement and offset control in robotic total hip arthroplasty performed through the modified anterolateral approach.通过改良前外侧入路行机器人全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯的位置和偏心距控制。
Int Orthop. 2023 Sep;47(9):2265-2273. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05835-5. Epub 2023 May 9.
8
A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing CT-based planning with conventional total hip arthroplasty versus robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty.一项前瞻性随机对照试验,比较基于 CT 的规划与传统全髋关节置换术与机器人辅助全髋关节置换术。
Bone Joint J. 2024 Apr 1;106-B(4):324-335. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B4.BJJ-2023-1045.R1.
9
Robotic-assisted versus manual total hip arthroplasty in obese patients: a retrospective case-control study.机器人辅助与手动全髋关节置换术在肥胖患者中的比较:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jul 30;17(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03263-6.
10
Improved radiographic outcomes and decreased complications rate on the femoral side can be achieved by a novel designed whole-process robotic assisted hip system for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.新型全流程机器人辅助髋关节置换系统可改善股骨侧的影像学结果并降低并发症发生率:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 16;18(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01835-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of traditional and robotic size prediction methods and stem positioning outcomes following prediction discrepancies in hip arthroplasty.髋关节置换术中传统与机器人尺寸预测方法的比较以及预测差异后的假体柄定位结果
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 21;19(1):409. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02594-w.
2
Safety and efficacy of orthopedic robots in total hip arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.骨科机器人在全髋关节置换术中的安全性和有效性:一项网状荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 19;19(1):846. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05279-6.
3
Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty outperforms manual technique in obese and overweight patients: a prospective comparative study.
机器人辅助全髋关节置换术在肥胖和超重患者中优于传统手工技术:一项前瞻性对照研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Oct 8;19(1):639. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05117-9.
4
Adverse events associated with robotic-assistance in total hip arthroplasty: an analysis based on the FDA MAUDE database.与全髋关节置换术机器人辅助相关的不良事件:基于 FDA MAUDE 数据库的分析。
Hip Int. 2024 Nov;34(6):688-694. doi: 10.1177/11207000241263315. Epub 2024 Aug 4.
5
Techniques and Technologies for the Intraoperative Assessment of Component Positioning, Leg Lengths, and Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.全髋关节置换术中组件定位、腿长及偏移量的术中评估技术与方法:一项系统综述
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Mar 29;27:101361. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101361. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of robotic assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.机器人辅助与传统全髋关节置换术的临床、功能和影像学结果:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 18;18(1):255. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01949-z.
7
Contemporary analysis of the learning curve for robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty emerging technologies.机器人辅助全髋关节置换术新技术学习曲线的当代分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 5;18(1):160. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01928-4.
8
Improved radiographic outcomes and decreased complications rate on the femoral side can be achieved by a novel designed whole-process robotic assisted hip system for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.新型全流程机器人辅助髋关节置换系统可改善股骨侧的影像学结果并降低并发症发生率:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 16;18(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01835-8.