Suppr超能文献

比较 COVID-19 危机早期在台侨民与岛内民众的压力与行为应对策略。

Comparing stress and behavioral coping strategies during the early stages of the COVID-19 crisis among domestic and overseas Taiwanese.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch and Biomedical Park Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan.

Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 8;12(1):11613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15567-y.

Abstract

This study reported domestic and overseas Taiwanese people's perceived stress levels and examined the mediation effect of their coping strategies during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. We recruited 2727 Taiwanese respondents from the COVIDiSTRESS Global Survey (N = 173,426) between March 30 and May 30, 2020. The self-report questionnaire included a modified 10-item Perceived Stress Scale and a 16-item coping strategy scale. Three stress-coping factors were extracted with principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Their effects were examined through a regression and mediation analysis. The overseas Taiwanese participants had a significantly higher stress level than domestic counterparts (2.89 to 2.69 in 1-5 scale, p < 0.001). Government guidance was associated with lower stress level among domestic (- 0.097, 95% C.I. [- 0.131, - 0.063]) but not overseas Taiwanese (0.025, [- 0.114, 0.163]). The association of stress level with residency was mediated by coping strategies, for government guidance (0.04, [0.01, 0.07], ref: domestic participants) and supportive social networks (- 0.03, [- 0.05, - 0.01]). All results hold after the propensity score matching on samples. Government guidance on COVID-19 as a channel for coping with stress is correlated with the residency status of the respondents. Public health authorities should recognize the importance of various mental health interventions during pandemics.

摘要

本研究报告了国内外台湾地区民众在 COVID-19 大流行早期的感知压力水平,并检验了他们应对策略的中介效应。我们于 2020 年 3 月 30 日至 5 月 30 日从 COVIDiSTRESS 全球调查中招募了 2727 名台湾地区受访者(N=173426)。自我报告问卷包括改良的 10 项感知压力量表和 16 项应对策略量表。采用主成分分析和验证性因素分析提取了三个压力应对因素。通过回归和中介分析检验了它们的影响。海外台湾地区参与者的压力水平明显高于岛内参与者(1-5 分制分别为 2.89 和 2.69,p<0.001)。政府指导与岛内参与者的低压力水平相关(-0.097,95%CI[-0.131,-0.063]),但与海外台湾地区参与者无关(0.025,[-0.114,0.163])。压力水平与居住地点的关系通过应对策略来中介,对于政府指导(0.04,[0.01,0.07],参照:岛内参与者)和支持性社会网络(-0.03,[-0.05,-0.01])。在对样本进行倾向评分匹配后,所有结果仍然成立。政府对 COVID-19 的指导作为一种应对压力的渠道,与受访者的居住地点有关。公共卫生当局应认识到在大流行期间各种心理健康干预的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eea9/9270469/ec22e2ef7f97/41598_2022_15567_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验