Centre for Allied Health, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK.
Hum Resour Health. 2022 Jul 8;20(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12960-022-00754-9.
UK equality law and National Health Service (NHS) policy requires racial equality in job appointments and career opportunities. However, recent national workforce race equality standard (WRES) data show that nearly all NHS organisations in the UK are failing to appoint ethnically diverse candidates with equivalent training and qualifications as their white counterparts. This is problematic because workforce diversity is associated with improved patient outcomes and other benefits for staff and organisations.
To better understand the reasons behind underrepresentation of ethnically diverse candidates in first NHS healthcare jobs post-qualification and to identify any structural or systemic barriers to employment for such groups.
The study was informed by critical theory and the authors' interdisciplinary perspectives as educators and researchers in the healthcare professions. Data collected from semi-structured face-to-face interviews with 12 nurse and physiotherapy recruiting managers from two NHS trusts in London were analysed using a healthcare workforce equity and diversity conceptual lens we developed from the literature. Using this lens, we devised questions to examine six dimensions of equity and diversity in the interview data from recruiting managers.
Recruiting managers said they valued the benefits of an ethnically diverse workforce for patients and their unit/organisation. However, their adherence to organisational policies for recruitment and selection, which emphasise objectivity and standardisation, acted as constraints to recognising ethnicity as an important issue in recruitment and workforce diversity. Some recruiting managers sense that there are barriers for ethnically diverse candidates but lacked information about workforce diversity, systems for monitoring recruitment, or ways to engage with staff or candidates to talk about these issues. Without this information there was no apparent problem or reason to try alternative approaches.
These accounts from 12 recruiting managers give a 'backstage' view into the reasons behind ethnic inequalities in recruitment to first healthcare job in the UK NHS. Adherence to recruitment and selection policies, which aim to support equality through standardisation and anonymisation, appear to be limiting workforce diversity and creating barriers for ethnically diverse candidates to attain the jobs that they are trained and qualified for. The Healthcare Workforce Equity + Diversity Lens we have developed can help to 'raise the curtain on the equality theatre' and inform more inclusive approaches to recruitment such as contextualised recruitment or effective allyship between employers and universities.
英国平等法和国民保健制度(NHS)政策要求在工作任命和职业机会方面实现种族平等。然而,最近的全国劳动力种族平等标准(WRES)数据显示,英国几乎所有的 NHS 组织都未能任命在培训和资格方面与白人同行相当的族裔多样化候选人。这是有问题的,因为劳动力多样性与改善患者结果和员工及组织的其他利益相关。
更好地了解族裔多样化候选人在获得资格后的 NHS 医疗保健第一份工作中代表性不足的原因,并确定此类群体就业面临的任何结构性或系统性障碍。
该研究的依据是批判理论和作者作为医疗保健专业教育者和研究人员的跨学科观点。从伦敦的两个 NHS 信托基金的 12 名护士和物理治疗师招聘经理的半结构化面对面访谈中收集的数据,使用我们从文献中开发的医疗保健劳动力公平和多样性概念框架进行分析。使用这个框架,我们设计了问题来检查招聘经理访谈数据中公平和多样性的六个维度。
招聘经理表示,他们重视多元化劳动力对患者及其单位/组织的好处。然而,他们对招聘和选拔强调客观性和标准化的组织政策的坚持,成为在招聘和劳动力多样性中承认族裔问题的重要因素。一些招聘经理感觉到族裔多样化候选人存在障碍,但缺乏关于劳动力多样性、监测招聘系统或与员工或候选人接触以讨论这些问题的方法的信息。如果没有这些信息,就没有明显的问题或理由尝试替代方法。
这 12 位招聘经理的说法提供了英国 NHS 医疗保健第一份工作招聘中种族不平等背后的“后台”观点。对招聘和选拔政策的坚持,旨在通过标准化和匿名化来支持平等,似乎限制了劳动力多样性,并为族裔多样化候选人获得他们受过培训和合格的工作造成障碍。我们开发的医疗保健劳动力公平+多样性视角可以帮助“揭开平等剧院的帷幕”,并为招聘提供更具包容性的方法,例如情境化招聘或雇主和大学之间的有效盟友关系。