• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施、变化机制和复杂干预措施改善养老院居民的跨专业合作和医疗质量的情境因素:跨专业 ACT 干预包的过程评估研究方案。

Implementation, mechanisms of change and contextual factors of a complex intervention to improve interprofessional collaboration and the quality of medical care for nursing home residents: study protocol of the process evaluation of the interprof ACT intervention package.

机构信息

Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Nursing Research Group, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus 50, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.

Chair of Organization and Corporate Development, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 3, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Trials. 2022 Jul 8;23(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06476-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-022-06476-6
PMID:35804455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9270799/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To improve interprofessional collaboration between registered nurses (RNs) and general practitioners (GPs) for nursing home residents (NHRs), the interprof ACT intervention package was developed. This complex intervention includes six components (e.g., shared goal setting, standardized procedures for GPs' nursing home visits) that can be locally adapted. The cluster-randomized interprof ACT trial evaluates the effects of this intervention on the cumulative incidence of hospital admissions (primary outcome) and secondary outcomes (e.g., length of hospital stays, utilization of emergency care services, and quality of life) within 12 months. It also includes a process evaluation which is subject of this protocol. The objectives of this evaluation are to assess the implementation of the interprof ACT intervention package and downstream effects on nurse-physician collaboration as well as preconditions and prospects for successive implementation into routine care.

METHODS

This study uses a mixed methods triangulation design involving all 34 participating nursing homes (clusters). The quantitative part comprises paper-based surveys among RNs, GPs, NHRs, and nursing home directors at baseline and 12 months. In the intervention group (17 clusters), data on the implementation of preplanned implementation strategies (training and supervision of nominated IPAVs, interprofessional kick-off meetings) and local implementation activities will be recorded. Major outcome domains are the dose, reach and fidelity of the implementation of the intervention package, changes in interprofessional collaboration, and contextual factors. The qualitative part will be conducted in a subsample of 8 nursing homes (4 per study group) and includes repeated non-participating observations and semistructured interviews on the interaction between involved health professionals and their work processes. Quantitative and qualitative data will be descriptively analyzed and then triangulated by means of joint displays and mixed methods informed regression models.

DISCUSSION

By integrating a variety of qualitative and quantitative data sources, this process evaluation will allow comprehensive assessment of the implementation of the interprof ACT intervention package, the changes induced in interprofessional collaboration, and the influence of contextual factors. These data will reveal expected and unexpected changes in the procedures of interprofessional care delivery and thus facilitate accurate conclusions for the further design of routine care services for NHRs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03426475 . Registered on 07/02/2018.

摘要

背景

为了改善注册护士(RNs)和全科医生(GPs)之间在养老院居民(NHRs)方面的合作,开发了跨专业 ACT 干预包。这个复杂的干预措施包括六个组成部分(例如,共同设定目标,为全科医生的养老院访问制定标准化程序),可以在当地进行调整。这项基于群组的跨专业 ACT 试验评估了该干预措施对 12 个月内住院人数(主要结果)和次要结果(例如,住院时间,急诊服务的使用以及生活质量)的累积发生率的影响。它还包括一个过程评估,这是本方案的主题。该评估的目的是评估跨专业 ACT 干预包的实施情况以及对护士与医师合作的后续影响,以及为后续实施到常规护理中的前提条件和前景。

方法

本研究采用混合方法三角测量设计,涉及所有 34 个参与的养老院(群组)。定量部分包括基线和 12 个月时对 RN、GP、NHR 和养老院主任进行的纸质问卷调查。在干预组(17 个群组)中,将记录计划实施策略(培训和监督指定的跨专业倡导者,跨专业启动会议)和当地实施活动的数据。主要结果领域是干预包的实施的剂量,范围和保真度,跨专业合作的变化以及背景因素。定性部分将在 8 个养老院(每组 4 个)的子样本中进行,包括对参与卫生专业人员及其工作流程之间相互作用的重复非参与观察和半结构化访谈。定量和定性数据将进行描述性分析,然后通过联合展示和混合方法知情回归模型进行三角测量。

讨论

通过整合各种定性和定量数据源,此过程评估将使我们能够全面评估跨专业 ACT 干预包的实施情况,跨专业合作所带来的变化以及背景因素的影响。这些数据将揭示在提供跨专业护理服务的程序中预期和意外的变化,从而为 NHR 的常规护理服务的进一步设计提供准确的结论。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03426475。注册于 2018 年 7 月 2 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5348/9270799/234f886180d2/13063_2022_6476_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5348/9270799/da192c5009fb/13063_2022_6476_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5348/9270799/bafd8da25c35/13063_2022_6476_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5348/9270799/234f886180d2/13063_2022_6476_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5348/9270799/da192c5009fb/13063_2022_6476_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5348/9270799/bafd8da25c35/13063_2022_6476_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5348/9270799/234f886180d2/13063_2022_6476_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation, mechanisms of change and contextual factors of a complex intervention to improve interprofessional collaboration and the quality of medical care for nursing home residents: study protocol of the process evaluation of the interprof ACT intervention package.实施、变化机制和复杂干预措施改善养老院居民的跨专业合作和医疗质量的情境因素:跨专业 ACT 干预包的过程评估研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jul 8;23(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06476-6.
2
Effects of strategies to improve general practitioner-nurse collaboration and communication in regard to hospital admissions of nursing home residents (interprof ACT): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.改善全科医生-护士合作及有关养老院居民住院事宜沟通的策略对(多专业合作行动)的影响:一项针对群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Nov 5;21(1):913. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04736-x.
3
Cluster randomised trial of a complex interprofessional intervention (interprof ACT) to reduce hospital admission of nursing home residents.一项针对复杂跨专业干预(interprofACT)以减少养老院居民住院的整群随机试验。
Age Ageing. 2023 Mar 1;52(3). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad022.
4
Interprofessional collaboration in nursing homes (interprof): a grounded theory study of general practitioner experiences and strategies to perform nursing home visits.养老院中的跨专业协作(跨专业):一项关于全科医生进行养老院家访经历与策略的扎根理论研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Aug 30;17(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0522-z.
5
Effect of an interprofessional care concept on the hospitalization of nursing home residents: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.跨专业护理理念对养老院居民住院的影响:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 May 18;21(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04325-y.
6
Interprofessional collaboration in nursing homes (interprof): development and piloting of measures to improve interprofessional collaboration and communication: a qualitative multicentre study.养老院中的跨专业协作(跨专业):改善跨专业协作与沟通措施的制定与试点:一项定性多中心研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jan 11;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0678-1.
7
Development of an interprofessional person-centred care concept for persons with care needs living in their own homes ( HOME): study protocol for a mixed-methods study.开发面向有居家照护需求的人员的以人为中心的跨专业照护理念(HOME):一项混合方法研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):e069597. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069597.
8
9
[Impact of CoCare, a Complex Model Intervention, on medical care in long-term care nursing homes in Germany: An overview of the outcome and process evaluation].[综合照护(一种复杂的模式干预)对德国长期护理养老院医疗护理的影响:结果与过程评估概述]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Sep;181:42-54. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
10
Interprofessional collaboration and communication in nursing homes: a qualitative exploration of problems in medical care for nursing home residents – study protocol.养老院中的跨专业协作与沟通:对养老院居民医疗护理问题的质性探索——研究方案
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Feb;71(2):451-7. doi: 10.1111/jan.12545. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Cluster randomised trial of a complex interprofessional intervention (interprof ACT) to reduce hospital admission of nursing home residents.一项针对复杂跨专业干预(interprofACT)以减少养老院居民住院的整群随机试验。
Age Ageing. 2023 Mar 1;52(3). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad022.

本文引用的文献

1
Pilot cluster randomised trial of an evidence-based intervention to reduce avoidable hospital admissions in nursing home residents (Better Health in Residents of Care Homes with Nursing-BHiRCH-NH Study).针对养老院居民减少可避免住院的基于证据的干预措施的试点群组随机试验(有护理的养老院居民更好健康-BHiRCH-NH 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 13;10(12):e040732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040732.
2
Effects of strategies to improve general practitioner-nurse collaboration and communication in regard to hospital admissions of nursing home residents (interprof ACT): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.改善全科医生-护士合作及有关养老院居民住院事宜沟通的策略对(多专业合作行动)的影响:一项针对群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Nov 5;21(1):913. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04736-x.
3
Rethinking Integrated Care: A Systematic Hermeneutic Review of the Literature on Integrated Care Strategies and Concepts.反思整合照护:整合照护策略与概念文献的系统诠释学回顾。
Milbank Q. 2020 Jun;98(2):446-492. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12459. Epub 2020 May 20.
4
Perspectives of general practitioners and nursing staff on acute hospital transfers of nursing home residents in Germany: results of two cross-sectional studies.德国全科医生和护理人员对养老院居民急性住院转院的看法:两项横断面研究的结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 11;21(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01108-x.
5
Effect of person-centred care on antipsychotic drug use in nursing homes (EPCentCare): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.以患者为中心的护理对养老院抗精神病药物使用的影响(EPCentCare):一项整群随机对照试验。
Age Ageing. 2019 May 1;48(3):419-425. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz016.
6
Toward an Objective Assessment of Implementation Processes for Innovations in Health Care: Psychometric Evaluation of the Normalization Measure Development (NoMAD) Questionnaire Among Mental Health Care Professionals.迈向医疗保健创新实施过程的客观评估:心理健康护理专业人员中标准化测量发展(NoMAD)问卷的心理测量学评估
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 20;21(2):e12376. doi: 10.2196/12376.
7
Potentially avoidable hospitalisations of German nursing home patients? A cross-sectional study on utilisation patterns and potential consequences for healthcare.德国养老院患者的潜在可避免住院治疗?利用模式及其对医疗保健的潜在影响的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 21;9(1):e025269. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025269.
8
Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 2 - validation of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT).改进复杂干预措施的规范化:第 2 部分 - 基于规范进程理论(NPT)评估实施工作的 NoMAD 工具的验证。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0591-x.
9
Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 1 - development of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT).优化复杂干预措施的规范化:第 1 部分 - 根据规范化进程理论(NPT)开发评估实施工作的 NoMAD 工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0590-y.
10
Degree of Implementation of the Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers (INTERACT) Quality Improvement Program Associated with Number of Hospitalizations.干预措施实施程度以降低急性医疗转院(INTERACT)质量改进计划与住院次数的关系。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Sep;66(9):1830-1837. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15476. Epub 2018 Aug 10.