• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨专业护理理念对养老院居民住院的影响:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案。

Effect of an interprofessional care concept on the hospitalization of nursing home residents: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.

University of Applied Sciences Saarbrücken, Saarbrücken, Germany.

出版信息

Trials. 2020 May 18;21(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04325-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-020-04325-y
PMID:32423463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7236352/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rising number of nursing home (NH) residents and their increasingly complex treatment needs pose a challenge to the German health care system. In Germany, there is no specialized geriatric medical care for NH residents. Nursing staff and general practitioners (GPs) in particular have to compensate for the additional demand, which is compounded by organizational and structural hurdles. As a result, avoidable emergency calls and hospital admissions occur. In the SaarPHIR project (Saarländische PflegeHeimversorgung Integriert Regelhaft), a complex intervention focusing on a medical care concept was developed in a participatory practice-based approach involving NH representatives and GPs. The complex intervention addresses the collaboration between nurses and GPs and aims to help restructure and optimize the existing daily care routine. It is expected to improve the medical care of geriatric patients in NHs and reduce stressful, costly hospital admissions. The intervention was pilot-tested during the first 12 months of the project. In the present study, its effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and safety will be evaluated.

METHODS

The study is a cluster-randomized controlled trial, comparing an intervention group with a control group. The intervention includes a concept of interprofessional collaboration, in which GPs group into regional cooperating teams. Teams are encouraged to cooperate more closely with NH staff and to provide on-call schedules, pre-weekend visits, joint team meetings, joint documentation, and improved medication safety. At least 32 NHs in Saarland, Germany (with at least 50 residents each) will be included and monitored for 12 months. The primary endpoint is hospitalization. Secondary endpoints are quality of life, quality of care, and medication safety. The control group receives treatment as usual. Process evaluation and health economic evaluation accompany the study. The data set contains claims data from German statutory health insurance companies as well as primary data. Analysis will be conducted using a generalized linear mixed model.

CONCLUSION

A reduction in hospital admissions of NH residents and relevant changes in secondary endpoints are expected. In turn, these will have a positive impact on the economic assessment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00017129. Registered on 23 April 2019. https://www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do.

摘要

背景

养老院(NH)居民人数的增加和他们日益复杂的治疗需求给德国的医疗保健系统带来了挑战。在德国,没有专门针对 NH 居民的老年医学护理。护理人员和全科医生(GP)尤其需要弥补这一额外的需求,而这又受到组织和结构障碍的影响。因此,会出现不必要的紧急呼叫和住院治疗。在 SaarPHIR 项目(Saarländische PflegeHeimversorgung Integriert Regelhaft)中,一个专注于医疗保健概念的复杂干预措施,通过参与式实践为基础的方法进行开发,涉及 NH 代表和 GP。该复杂干预措施旨在解决护士和 GP 之间的合作问题,并帮助重组和优化现有的日常护理常规。预计这将改善 NH 中老年患者的医疗护理,并减少紧张和昂贵的住院治疗。该干预措施在项目的前 12 个月进行了试点测试。在本研究中,将评估其有效性、成本效益和安全性。

方法

本研究是一项集群随机对照试验,将干预组与对照组进行比较。干预措施包括跨专业合作的概念,其中 GP 组成区域性合作团队。鼓励团队与 NH 工作人员更紧密地合作,提供值班时间表、周末前访问、联合团队会议、联合记录和改善药物安全性。德国萨尔州至少有 32 家 NH(每家至少有 50 名居民)将被纳入并监测 12 个月。主要终点是住院治疗。次要终点是生活质量、护理质量和药物安全性。对照组接受常规治疗。该研究还包括过程评估和健康经济评估。数据集包含德国法定健康保险公司的索赔数据和主要数据。分析将使用广义线性混合模型进行。

结论

预计 NH 居民的住院人数将减少,次要终点也将发生变化。反过来,这将对经济评估产生积极影响。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册中心:DRKS00017129。于 2019 年 4 月 23 日注册。https://www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/565b/7236352/226331bffa43/13063_2020_4325_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/565b/7236352/e3cc9fd20340/13063_2020_4325_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/565b/7236352/226331bffa43/13063_2020_4325_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/565b/7236352/e3cc9fd20340/13063_2020_4325_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/565b/7236352/226331bffa43/13063_2020_4325_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of an interprofessional care concept on the hospitalization of nursing home residents: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.跨专业护理理念对养老院居民住院的影响:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 May 18;21(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04325-y.
2
Effects of strategies to improve general practitioner-nurse collaboration and communication in regard to hospital admissions of nursing home residents (interprof ACT): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.改善全科医生-护士合作及有关养老院居民住院事宜沟通的策略对(多专业合作行动)的影响:一项针对群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Nov 5;21(1):913. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04736-x.
3
Multidisciplinary intervention to improve medication safety in nursing home residents: protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial (HIOPP-3-iTBX study).多学科干预措施提高养老院居民用药安全性:一项整群随机对照试验(HIOPP-3-iTBX 研究)方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Jan 25;19(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1027-0.
4
A complex health services intervention to improve medical care in long-term care homes: study protocol of the controlled coordinated medical care (CoCare) study.一项旨在改善长期护理院医疗服务的复杂卫生服务干预措施:受控协调医疗护理(CoCare)研究的研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 24;19(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4156-4.
5
Perspectives of general practitioners and nursing staff on acute hospital transfers of nursing home residents in Germany: results of two cross-sectional studies.德国全科医生和护理人员对养老院居民急性住院转院的看法:两项横断面研究的结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 11;21(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01108-x.
6
Implementation, mechanisms of change and contextual factors of a complex intervention to improve interprofessional collaboration and the quality of medical care for nursing home residents: study protocol of the process evaluation of the interprof ACT intervention package.实施、变化机制和复杂干预措施改善养老院居民的跨专业合作和医疗质量的情境因素:跨专业 ACT 干预包的过程评估研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jul 8;23(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06476-6.
7
Evidence-based intervention to reduce avoidable hospital admissions in care home residents (the Better Health in Residents in Care Homes (BHiRCH) study): protocol for a pilot cluster randomised trial.基于证据的干预措施以减少养老院居民的可避免住院(更好的养老院居民健康研究(BHiRCH)):一项试点性集群随机试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 27;9(5):e026510. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026510.
8
Effectiveness of a complex regional advance care planning intervention to improve care consistency with care preferences: study protocol for a multi-center, cluster-randomized controlled trial focusing on nursing home residents (BEVOR trial).一项复杂的区域预先医疗照护计划干预措施以提高与照护偏好的一致性的效果:一项多中心、整群随机对照试验的研究方案,重点关注养老院居民(BEVOR 试验)。
Trials. 2022 Sep 12;23(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06576-3.
9
[Impact of CoCare, a Complex Model Intervention, on medical care in long-term care nursing homes in Germany: An overview of the outcome and process evaluation].[综合照护(一种复杂的模式干预)对德国长期护理养老院医疗护理的影响:结果与过程评估概述]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Sep;181:42-54. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
10
Pilot cluster randomised trial of an evidence-based intervention to reduce avoidable hospital admissions in nursing home residents (Better Health in Residents of Care Homes with Nursing-BHiRCH-NH Study).针对养老院居民减少可避免住院的基于证据的干预措施的试点群组随机试验(有护理的养老院居民更好健康-BHiRCH-NH 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 13;10(12):e040732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040732.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of an interprofessional care concept in nursing homes evaluated in the SaarPHIR project: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.在萨尔州PHIR项目中评估的跨专业护理理念在养老院中的效果:一项整群随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2025 May 15;20(5):e0321118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321118. eCollection 2025.
2
Geriatric assessment in Belgian nursing homes: qualitative insights.比利时养老院中的老年评估:质性见解
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 19;25(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12484-4.
3
Exploring the implementation of multidisciplinary collaboration at nursing homes in Jakarta, Indonesia: A descriptive phenomenological study.

本文引用的文献

1
A complex health services intervention to improve medical care in long-term care homes: study protocol of the controlled coordinated medical care (CoCare) study.一项旨在改善长期护理院医疗服务的复杂卫生服务干预措施:受控协调医疗护理(CoCare)研究的研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 24;19(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4156-4.
2
Potentially avoidable hospitalisations of German nursing home patients? A cross-sectional study on utilisation patterns and potential consequences for healthcare.德国养老院患者的潜在可避免住院治疗?利用模式及其对医疗保健的潜在影响的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 21;9(1):e025269. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025269.
3
探索印度尼西亚雅加达养老院多学科协作的实施情况:一项描述性现象学研究。
Belitung Nurs J. 2024 Jun 28;10(3):332-340. doi: 10.33546/bnj.3226. eCollection 2024.
4
[Focusing on intersectorality-strategies and current research projects for the care of geriatric people].[聚焦跨部门合作——老年护理的策略与当前研究项目]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 May;67(5):595-604. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03851-3. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
5
Reducing burden and building goodwill for practice-embedded trials: Results of rapid qualitative methods in the preimplementation phase of a community paramedic trial to reduce hospitalizations.减轻实践嵌入式试验的负担并建立良好意愿:社区护理人员试验预实施阶段快速定性方法的结果,以减少住院率
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Feb 8;7(1):e61. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.18. eCollection 2023.
6
[Nursing home-sensitive conditions and approaches to reduce hospitalization of nursing home residents].[养老院敏感状况及减少养老院居民住院率的方法]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Feb;66(2):199-211. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03654-4. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
7
Cost-benefit analysis of the CoCare intervention to improve medical care in long-term care nursing homes: an analysis based on claims data.CoCare 干预措施以改善长期护理养老院医疗服务的成本效益分析:基于索赔数据的分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Nov;24(8):1343-1355. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01546-7. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
Interprofessional collaboration in nursing homes (interprof): development and piloting of measures to improve interprofessional collaboration and communication: a qualitative multicentre study.
养老院中的跨专业协作(跨专业):改善跨专业协作与沟通措施的制定与试点:一项定性多中心研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jan 11;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0678-1.
4
Reducing Avoidable Hospital Transfers From Nursing Homes in Austria: Project Outline and Baseline Results.减少奥地利养老院中可避免的医院转诊:项目概述与基线结果
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2017 Mar 21;3:2333721417696671. doi: 10.1177/2333721417696671. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
5
Reducing Inpatient Hospital and Emergency Room Utilization Among Nursing Home Residents.降低疗养院居民的住院医院和急诊室使用率。
J Aging Health. 2017 Apr;29(3):510-530. doi: 10.1177/0898264316641074. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
6
Substantial risks associated with few clusters in cluster randomized and stepped wedge designs.整群随机对照试验和阶梯式楔形设计中,少数群组存在的重大风险。
Clin Trials. 2016 Aug;13(4):459-63. doi: 10.1177/1740774516634316. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
7
[Development of a catalogue of criteria for successful medical care in nursing homes].[养老院成功医疗护理标准目录的制定]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(8):570-7. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
8
Which hospitalisations are ambulatory care-sensitive, to what degree, and how could the rates be reduced? Results of a group consensus study in Germany.哪些住院治疗属于门诊护理敏感型,程度如何,以及如何降低其发生率?德国一项小组共识研究的结果。
Health Policy. 2015 Nov;119(11):1415-23. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
9
Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials Using Covariate Constrained Randomization: A Method for Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs).使用协变量约束随机化的实用整群随机试验:一种基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)的方法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):663-72. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150001.
10
Effect of person-centred care on antipsychotic drug use in nursing homes (EPCentCare): study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial.以患者为中心的护理对养老院抗精神病药物使用的影响(EPCentCare):一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Implement Sci. 2015 Jun 4;10:82. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0268-3.