Wow Thomas, Kolacinska-Wow Agnieszka, Wichtowski Mateusz, Boguszewska-Byczkiewicz Katarzyna, Nowicka Zuzanna, Ploszka Katarzyna, Pieszko Karolina, Murawa Dawid
Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zielona Gora, Zyty 26, 65-046 Zielona Gora, Poland.
Department of Oncological Physiotherapy, Medical University of Lodz, Paderewskiego 4, 93-509 Lodz, Poland.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 29;14(13):3188. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133188.
(1) Introduction: In response to patient concerns about breast cancer recurrence, increased use of breast magnetic resonance imaging and genetic testing, and advancements in breast reconstruction techniques, mastectomy rates have been observed to rise over the last decade. The aim of the study is to compare the outcomes of prepectoral and subpectoral implants and long-term, dual-stage resorbable mesh-based breast reconstructions in mutation carriers (prophylactic surgery) and breast cancer patients. (2) Patients and methods: This retrospective, two-center study included 170 consecutive patients after 232 procedures: Prepectoral surgery was performed in 156 cases and subpectoral was performed in 76. (3) Results: Preoperative chemotherapy was associated with more frequent minor late complications (p < 0.001), but not major ones (p = 0.101), while postoperative chemotherapy was related to more frequent serious (p = 0.005) postoperative complications. Postoperative radiotherapy was associated with a higher rate of minor complications (31.03%) than no-radiotherapy (12.21%; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression found complications to be significantly associated with an expander (OR = 4.43), skin-reducing mastectomy (OR = 9.97), therapeutic mastectomy vs. risk-reducing mastectomy (OR = 4.08), and postoperative chemotherapy (OR = 12.89). Patients in whom prepectoral surgeries were performed demonstrated significantly shorter median hospitalization time (p < 0.001) and lower minor complication rates (5.77% vs. 26.32% p < 0.001), but similar major late complication rates (p = 0.915). (4) Conclusions: Implant-based breast reconstruction with the use of long-term, dual-stage resorbable, synthetic mesh is a safe and effective method of breast restoration, associated with low morbidity and good cosmesis. Nevertheless, prospective, multicenter, and long-term outcome data studies are needed to further evaluate the benefits of such treatments.
(1) 引言:为回应患者对乳腺癌复发的担忧、乳腺磁共振成像和基因检测的使用增加以及乳房重建技术的进步,在过去十年中观察到乳房切除术的发生率有所上升。本研究的目的是比较胸前和胸肌下植入物以及基于可吸收网片的长期双阶段乳房重建在突变携带者(预防性手术)和乳腺癌患者中的效果。(2) 患者和方法:这项回顾性、双中心研究纳入了232例手术后的170例连续患者:156例进行了胸前手术,76例进行了胸肌下手术。(3) 结果:术前化疗与更频繁的轻度晚期并发症相关(p < 0.001),但与严重并发症无关(p = 0.101),而术后化疗与更频繁的严重术后并发症相关(p = 0.005)。术后放疗与轻度并发症发生率较高(31.03%)相关,高于未放疗组(12.21%;p < 0.001)。多因素逻辑回归发现并发症与扩张器(OR = 4.43)、皮肤切除乳房切除术(OR = 9.97)、治疗性乳房切除术与降低风险乳房切除术(OR = 4.08)以及术后化疗(OR = 12.89)显著相关。接受胸前手术的患者住院时间中位数显著缩短(p < 0.001),轻度并发症发生率较低(5.77% 对 26.32%,p < 0.001),但严重晚期并发症发生率相似(p = 0.915)。(4) 结论:使用长期、双阶段、可吸收合成网片进行基于植入物的乳房重建是一种安全有效的乳房修复方法,发病率低且美容效果良好。然而,需要进行前瞻性、多中心和长期结果数据研究,以进一步评估此类治疗的益处。