European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;19(13):7602. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137602.
Periodic technical inspection (PTI) of vehicles guarantees safety and environmental compliance during their lifetime. Particulate matter emissions of diesel vehicles are controlled with opacity measurements. After the introduction of diesel particulate filters (DPFs), particulate matter emissions have drastically decreased and the sensitivity of the opacity method is questioned. Several countries have already or are planning to introduce a solid particle number (SPN) method at their PTI that will either substitute or complement opacity measurements. However, there are differences in the measurement procedures and the limit values. In this study, we compared the different approaches and investigated topics which are still not well defined, such as the uncertainty of the SPN-PTI instruments, repeatability of the procedures, impact of the DPF fill state, and the correlation between type-approval SPN emissions and SPN concentrations during PTI tests. Finally, we compared the SPN-PTI instruments with the opacity meters. Our results showed that SPN-PTI measurements can detect tampered and defective DPFs. We also made suggestions on the measurement procedures and the concentration limit.
车辆定期技术检查(PTI)可确保车辆在其使用寿命期间的安全性和环境合规性。使用不透明度测量来控制柴油车辆的颗粒物排放。在引入柴油颗粒过滤器(DPF)之后,颗粒物排放已大大减少,不透明度方法的灵敏度受到质疑。一些国家已经或将计划在其 PTI 中引入固体颗粒数(SPN)方法,该方法将替代或补充不透明度测量。然而,在测量程序和限值方面存在差异。在这项研究中,我们比较了不同的方法,并研究了一些尚未明确定义的主题,例如 SPN-PTI 仪器的不确定度、程序的重复性、DPF 填充状态的影响以及型式批准 SPN 排放与 PTI 测试期间的 SPN 浓度之间的相关性。最后,我们将 SPN-PTI 仪器与不透明度计进行了比较。我们的结果表明,SPN-PTI 测量可以检测到经过篡改和有缺陷的 DPF。我们还对测量程序和浓度限值提出了建议。