UNIPRO-Oral Pathology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), CESPU, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.
UnIGENe, IBMC-Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 29;19(13):7974. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137974.
Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and headache are complex. This study aims to assess the association between TMD, headache, and psychological dimensions such as psychological inflexibility and pain acceptance. The sample consisted of 120 participants following a non-probabilistic convenience sampling strategy through a direct invitation to the patients attending our facilities and their relatives ( = 61 diagnosed with headache, = 34 diagnosed with TMD-headache, = 25 control group). Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC-TMD), International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3 beta version), Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8), and Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS) were used as assessment tools. One-way ANOVA, multiple regression analysis (MRA), and the Johnson-Neyman approach were run by IBM SPSS, version 27 (IBM Company, Chicago, IL, USA). The significance level was 0.05. One third of our sample presented with headache with TMD. Females were predominant. Males with headache, no systemic disease, less pain severity but higher frequency, living longer with the disease and having sensitive changes, showed higher pain acceptance. When headache occurs with TMD, women with higher education, no headache family history, less pain, and no motor changes showed higher pain acceptance. Patients with both conditions are more liable to have chronic pain and pain inflexibility. Pain intensity and willingness explain 50% of the psychological inflexibility in the headache group. In our sample, individuals suffering from both conditions show greater pain inflexibility, implicating more vivid suffering experiences, leading to altered daily decisions and actions. However, further studies are needed to highlight this possible association.
颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)和头痛较为复杂。本研究旨在评估 TMD、头痛与心理维度(如心理不灵活性和疼痛承受力)之间的关联。该研究采用非概率便利抽样策略,通过直接邀请我们机构的患者及其家属参与(=61 例头痛诊断患者,=34 例 TMD-头痛诊断患者,=25 例对照组)。使用颞下颌关节紊乱诊断标准(DC-TMD)、头痛国际分类(ICHD-3 beta 版)、慢性疼痛承受力问卷(CPAQ-8)和疼痛心理不灵活性量表(PIPS)作为评估工具。采用 IBM SPSS 版本 27(IBM 公司,芝加哥,IL,美国)进行单因素方差分析、多元回归分析(MRA)和 Johnson-Neyman 方法。显著性水平为 0.05。我们的样本中有三分之一同时患有 TMD 相关头痛。女性居多。患有头痛的男性、无系统性疾病、疼痛严重程度较低但频率较高、患病时间较长且敏感性变化较高,其疼痛承受力较高。当头痛与 TMD 同时发生时,具有较高学历、无头痛家族史、疼痛较轻且无运动变化的女性表现出更高的疼痛承受力。同时患有这两种疾病的患者更容易患有慢性疼痛和疼痛不灵活性。疼痛强度和意愿解释了头痛组中 50%的心理不灵活性。在我们的样本中,同时患有这两种疾病的个体表现出更大的疼痛不灵活性,意味着更生动的痛苦体验,导致日常决策和行动发生改变。然而,需要进一步的研究来强调这种可能的关联。