Hsiao Ching-Hua, Chen Jia-Shing, Shiao Yu-Ming, Chen Yann-Jang, Chen Ching-Hsuan, Chu Woei-Chyn, Wu Yi-Cheng
Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei City Hospital, Women and Children Campus, Taipei 100, Taiwan.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 23;11(13):3624. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133624.
Background: To assess the value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) during the prenatal diagnosis of high-risk pregnancies. Methods: Between January 2016 and November 2021, we included 178 chorionic villi and 859 amniocentesis samples from consecutive cases at a multiple tertiary hospital. Each of these high-risk singleton pregnancies had at least one of the following indications: (1) advanced maternal age (AMA; ≥35 years; 546, 52.7%); (2) fetal structural abnormality on ultrasound (197, 19.0%); (3) high-risk first- or second-trimester Down syndrome screen (189, 18.2%), including increased nuchal translucency (≥3.5 mm; 90, 8.7%); or (4) previous pregnancy, child, or family history (105, 10.1%) affected by chromosomal abnormality or genetic disorder. Both G-banding karyotype analysis and CMA were performed. DNA was extracted directly and examined with oligonucleotide array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Results: Aneuploidies were detected by both G-banding karyotyping and CMA in 42/1037 (4.05%) cases. Among the 979 cases with normal karyotypes, 110 (10.6%) cases had copy number variants (CNVs) in CMA, including 30 (2.9%) cases with reported pathogenic and likely pathogenic CNVs ≥ 400 kb, 37 (3.6%) with nonreported VOUS, benign, or likely benign CNVs ≥ 400 kb, and 43 (4.1%) with nonreported CNVs < 400 kb. Of the 58 (5.6%) cases with aneuploidy rearrangements, 42 (4.1%) were diagnosed by both G-banding karyotyping and CMA; four inversions, six balanced translocations, and six low mosaic rates were not detected with CMA. Conclusions: CMA is an effective first step for the prenatal diagnosis of high-risk pregnancies with fetal structural anomalies found in ultrasonography or upon positive findings.
评估染色体微阵列分析(CMA)在高危妊娠产前诊断中的价值。方法:2016年1月至2021年11月期间,我们纳入了一家三级综合医院连续病例中的178例绒毛膜绒毛样本和859例羊水样本。这些高危单胎妊娠中的每一例至少有以下指征之一:(1)高龄产妇(AMA;≥35岁;546例,52.7%);(2)超声检查发现胎儿结构异常(197例,19.0%);(3)孕早期或孕中期唐氏综合征筛查高危(189例,18.2%),包括颈项透明层增厚(≥3.5mm;90例,8.7%);或(4)既往妊娠、子女或家族史(105例,10.1%)受染色体异常或遗传疾病影响。同时进行了G显带核型分析和CMA。直接提取DNA并采用基于寡核苷酸阵列的比较基因组杂交技术进行检测。结果:在1037例样本中,42例(4.05%)通过G显带核型分析和CMA均检测到非整倍体。在979例核型正常的病例中,110例(10.6%)在CMA中检测到拷贝数变异(CNV),其中30例(2.9%)为已报道的致病性和可能致病性CNV≥400kb,37例(3.6%)为未报道的意义不明的变异(VOUS)、良性或可能良性的CNV≥400kb,43例(4.1%)为未报道的CNV<400kb。在58例(5.6%)非整倍体重排病例中,42例(4.1%)通过G显带核型分析和CMA均被诊断出来;4例倒位、6例平衡易位和6例低嵌合率病例未被CMA检测到。结论:对于超声检查发现胎儿结构异常或检查结果呈阳性的高危妊娠,CMA是产前诊断的有效第一步。