Huang Jingjuan, Zhang Weiwei, Pan Changqing, Zhu Shiwei, Mead Robert Hardwin, Li Ruogu, He Ben
Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Silicon Valley Cardiology, East Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 3;11(13):3862. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133862.
The mobile cardiac acoustic monitoring system is a promising tool to enable detection and assist the diagnosis of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). The objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of electromechanical activation time (EMAT), an important cardiac acoustic biomarker, in quantifying LVSD among left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) patients using a mobile acoustic cardiography monitoring system. In this prospective single-center observational study, pacemaker-dependent patients were consecutively enrolled. EMAT, the time from the start of the pacing QRS wave to first heart sound (S1) peak; left ventricular systolic time (LVST), the time from S1 peak to S2 peak; and ECG were recorded simultaneously by the mobile cardiac acoustic monitoring system. LVEF was measured by echocardiography. A logistic regression model was applied to evaluate the association between EMAT and reduced EF (LVEF < 50%). A total of 105 pacemaker-dependent patients participated. The RVAP group (n = 58) displayed a significantly higher EMAT than the LBBP group (n = 47) (150.95 ± 19.46 vs. 108.23 ± 12.26 ms, p < 0.001). Pearson correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant negative correlation between EMAT and LVEF (p < 0.001). Survival analysis showed the sensitivity and specificity of detecting LVEF to be < 50% when EMAT ≥ 151 ms were 96.00% and 96.97% in the RVAP group. In LBBP patients, the sensitivity and specificity of using EMAT ≥ 110 ms as the cutoff value for the detection of LVEF < 50% were 75.00% and 100.00%. There was no significant difference in LVST with or without LVSD in the RVAP group (p = 0.823) and LBBP group (p = 0.086). Compared to LVST, EMAT was more helpful to identify LVSD in pacemaker-dependent patients. The cutoff point of EMAT for diagnosing LVEF < 50% differed regarding the pacing type. Therefore, the mobile cardiac acoustic monitoring system can be used to identify the progress of LVSD in pacemaker patients.
移动心脏声学监测系统是一种很有前景的工具,可用于检测并辅助诊断左心室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)。本研究的目的是使用移动心脏声学监测系统,评估机电激活时间(EMAT)这一重要的心脏声学生物标志物在量化左束支起搏(LBBP)和右心室心尖起搏(RVAP)患者LVSD中的诊断价值。在这项前瞻性单中心观察性研究中,连续纳入了起搏器依赖型患者。EMAT是从起搏QRS波开始到第一心音(S1)峰值的时间;左心室收缩时间(LVST)是从S1峰值到S2峰值的时间;心电图由移动心脏声学监测系统同时记录。左心室射血分数(LVEF)通过超声心动图测量。应用逻辑回归模型评估EMAT与降低的EF(LVEF < 50%)之间的关联。共有105名起搏器依赖型患者参与。RVAP组(n = 58)的EMAT显著高于LBBP组(n = 47)(150.95±19.46 vs. 108.23±12.26毫秒,p < 0.001)。Pearson相关性分析显示EMAT与LVEF之间存在统计学上显著的负相关(p < 0.001)。生存分析表明,在RVAP组中,当EMAT≥151毫秒时,检测LVEF < 50%的敏感性和特异性分别为96.00%和96.97%。在LBBP患者中,使用EMAT≥110毫秒作为检测LVEF < 50%的截断值时,敏感性和特异性分别为75.00%和100.00%。RVAP组(p = 0.823)和LBBP组(p = 0.086)中有无LVSD的LVST无显著差异。与LVST相比,EMAT在识别起搏器依赖型患者的LVSD方面更有帮助。诊断LVEF < 50%时EMAT的截断点因起搏类型而异。因此,移动心脏声学监测系统可用于识别起搏器患者LVSD的进展情况。