Suppr超能文献

使用斑点追踪超声心动图比较不同起搏部位对心脏同步性和收缩的急性影响。

Comparison of the Acute Effects of Different Pacing Sites on Cardiac Synchrony and Contraction Using Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography.

作者信息

Xie Huilin, Chen Xueying, Wang Yanan, Cheng Yufei, Zhao Yingjie, Liu Yang, Liu Yu, Ge Zhenyi, Chen Haiyan, Shu Xianhong

机构信息

Department of Echocardiography, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 11;8:758500. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.758500. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Cardiac pacing in patients with bradyarrhythmia may employ variable pacing sites, which may have different effects on cardiac function. Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a new physiological pacing modality, and the acute outcomes on cardiac mechanical synchrony during LBBP remain uncertain. We evaluated the acute effects of four pacing sites on cardiac synchrony and contraction using speckle-tracking echocardiography, and comparisons among four different pacing sites were rare. We enrolled 21 patients with atrioventricular block or sick sinus syndrome who each sequentially underwent acute pacing protocols, including right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP), right ventricular outflow tract pacing (RVOP), His bundle pacing (HBP), and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). Electrocardiograms and echocardiograms were recorded at baseline and during pacing. The interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD), the standard deviation of the times to longitudinal peak strain during 17 segments (PSD), and the Yu index were used to evaluate ventricular mechanical synchrony. Layer-specific strain was computed using two-dimensional speckle tracking technique to provide in-depth details about ventricular synchrony and function. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) were significantly decreased during RVAP and RVOP but were not significantly different during HBP and LBBP compared with baseline. RVAP and RVOP significantly prolonged QRS duration, whereas HBP and LBBP showed non-significant effects. IVMD and PSD were significantly increased during RVAP but were not significantly different during RVOP, HBP, or LBBP. LBBP resulted in a significant improvement in the IVMD and Yu index compared with RVAP. No significant differences in mechanical synchrony were found between HBP and LBBP. Among these pacing modalities, RVAP has a negative acute impact on cardiac synchrony and contraction. HBP and LBBP best preserve physiological cardiac synchrony and function.

摘要

缓慢性心律失常患者的心脏起搏可采用不同的起搏部位,这可能对心脏功能产生不同影响。左束支起搏(LBBP)是一种新的生理性起搏方式,LBBP期间心脏机械同步性的急性结果仍不确定。我们使用斑点追踪超声心动图评估了四个起搏部位对心脏同步性和收缩的急性影响,而四个不同起搏部位之间的比较很少见。我们纳入了21例房室传导阻滞或病态窦房结综合征患者,他们每人依次接受急性起搏方案,包括右心室心尖起搏(RVAP)、右心室流出道起搏(RVOP)、希氏束起搏(HBP)和左束支起搏(LBBP)。在基线和起搏期间记录心电图和超声心动图。使用心室间机械延迟(IVMD)、17节段纵向峰值应变时间的标准差(PSD)和Yu指数来评估心室机械同步性。使用二维斑点追踪技术计算心肌各层应变,以提供有关心室同步性和功能的深入细节。与基线相比,RVAP和RVOP期间左心室射血分数(LVEF)和三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移(TAPSE)显著降低,但HBP和LBBP期间无显著差异。RVAP和RVOP显著延长QRS时限,而HBP和LBBP无显著影响。RVAP期间IVMD和PSD显著增加,而RVOP、HBP或LBBP期间无显著差异。与RVAP相比,LBBP使IVMD和Yu指数显著改善。HBP和LBBP之间未发现机械同步性有显著差异。在这些起搏方式中,RVAP对心脏同步性和收缩有负面急性影响。HBP和LBBP最能保留生理性心脏同步性和功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6be6/8631923/4864c56e8680/fcvm-08-758500-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验