Burke M J, Whelan M V
Br J Sports Med. 1987 Mar;21(1):29-32. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.21.1.29.
In recent years increasing emphasis has been placed on the benefits of exercise to normal healthy adults as well as to those recovering from heart attacks and other illnesses. As an aid to exercise training many portable heart-rate monitors have been placed on the market but little appears to have been done to assess the performance of these machines. The authors have examined the performance of four such monitors both under bench-test and practical exercising conditions. When tested on the bench using electronic equipment, the machines rarely exhibited errors exceeding 2-3 bpm over a measurement range of 30-240 bpm. However, when tested with subjects walking or jogging at low speeds on a treadmill, typically 20-70% of the readings given by the machines had errors of greater than 20 bpm. In some cases over 50% of readings had errors exceeding 50 bpm.
近年来,人们越来越重视运动对正常健康成年人以及心脏病发作和其他疾病康复者的益处。作为运动训练的辅助工具,许多便携式心率监测仪已投放市场,但在评估这些仪器的性能方面似乎做得很少。作者在台架测试和实际运动条件下对四种此类监测仪的性能进行了检验。当在台架上使用电子设备进行测试时,这些仪器在30 - 240次/分钟的测量范围内很少出现超过2 - 3次/分钟的误差。然而,当受试者在跑步机上以低速行走或慢跑进行测试时,这些仪器给出的读数通常有20 - 70%的误差大于20次/分钟。在某些情况下,超过50%的读数误差超过50次/分钟。